Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersoklacivapp

1,936 results

1.41s

  • Finance & Investment Co. v. UMA, L.L.C.

    227 P.3d 1082 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · May 18, 2009

    In reliance on Russell v. … Corff Partnership, Ltd. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • WILJO INTERIORS, INC. v. RIALS

    394 P.3d 327 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 22, 2016

    Standard of Review ¶ 11 In Estenson Logistics v. … Union Texas Petroleum v. Corp. Com’n of State of Okl., 1981 OK 86 , ¶ 31, 651 P.2d 652, 662 . III.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • RAY v. STITT

    2023 OK CIV APP 9 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 1, 2023

    RAY v. … KEVIN STITT, Governor for the State of Oklahoma; TOM BATES, Director for the Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board, Respondents/Appellees. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA HONORABLE RICHARD C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • GRAHAM v. CROW

    541 P.3d 218 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 17, 2023

    Brown v. Okla. State Bank & Trust Co., 1993 OK 117, ¶ 7 , 860 P.2d 230, 233 . See Fargo v. … Lankford Discussed Oklahoma Supreme Court Cases Cite Name Level 1993 OK 117 , 860 P.2d 230 , 64 OBJ 2882, Brown v. Oklahoma State Bank & Trust Co. of Vinita Discussed 1997 OK 42 , 936 P.2d 940 , 68 OBJ 1454, Malson v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sisk v. Sanditen Investments, Ltd.

    662 P.2d 317 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 29, 1983

    Goodman v. Norman Bank of Commerce, 565 P.2d 372 (Okl. 1977). See also, Hall v. … Co., Inc. v. Russell Creek Coal Co., 645 P.2d 1005 (Okl.1982); Olansen v. Texaco Inc., 587 P.2d 976 (Okl.1978); Goodman v. Norman Bank of Commerce, 565 P.2d 372 (Okl.1977); Russell v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • City of Tulsa v. Heminger

    706 P.2d 917 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 11, 1985

    Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa County v. Board of County Commissioners, 674 P.2d 547, 550 (Okla.1983). Furthermore, there is a strong presumption against implied repeals. … In Cassidy v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Howard Ex Rel. Payne v. Grady County Criminal Justice Authority

    394 P.3d 299 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 19, 2016

    Fanning v. Brown , 2004 OK 7, ¶ 4 , 85 P.3d 841 . The court must take as true all of the challenged pleading's allegations together with all reasonable inferences which may be drawn from them. Id. … BROWN Discussed 2013 OK 9 , 305 P.3d 994 , BOSH v. CHEROKEE COUNTY GOVERNMENTAL BUILDING AUTHORITY Discussed at Length 1975 OK 96 , 537 P.2d 1211 , CITY OF EDMOND v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • MEDDERS v. YOUNG

    370 P.3d 1214 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 26, 2016

    Plaintiffs state, however, that Gonzalez was "working under the [Construction Industries Board] number and supervision of T. Cole Construction," and hence the roofing was performed by a registered contractor. … Runyon v. Reid, 1978 OK 25, ¶ 13 , 510 P.2d 943 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Stevenson v. Stevenson

    680 P.2d 642 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 9, 1984

    See, Falletti v. Brown, 481 P.2d 744 (Okl.1971). IV Wife raises two propositions of error concerning attorneys’ fees. … Burk v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Lounds v. State Ex Rel. Department of Veterans Affairs

    255 P.3d 460 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 25, 2011

    Neil Acquisition, L.L.C,. v. Wingrod Inv. … Warner v. Hillcrest Med. Ctr., 1995 OK CIV APP 123, ¶ 42 , 914 P.2d 1060, 1071 , quoting Payton v. Abbott Labs, 780 F.2d 147, 155, 156 (1st Cir.1985), and citing Sprague v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Primrose v. Primrose

    663 P.2d 755 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · May 13, 1983

    In the ease of Price v. … Stansberry v. Stansberry, supra.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Kerr Glass Co. v. Wilson

    65 O.B.A.J. 2851 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · May 3, 1994

    We will not normally decide abstract or hypothetical questions, and find no support for an exception from that rule here. [8] See, *419 Morton v. Adair County Excise Board, 780 P.2d 707 (Okla. 1989). … Board public interest is a recognized exception to the mootness doctrine, Marquette v. Marquette, 686 P.2d 990 (Okla.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • In Re Marriage of Slate and Chadwick

    232 P.3d 916 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 21, 2009

    Tal v. … Fanning v. Brown, 2004 OK 7 , 85 P.3d 841 . The fundamental rule of statutory construction is to ascertain and give effect to the legislative intent, and that intent is first sought in the language of a statute. Id.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Robinson v. Southerland

    123 P.3d 35 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · May 13, 2005

    Manley v. Brown, 1999 OK 79, ¶ 8 , 989 P.2d 448, 452 . (Emphasis original.) (Footnotes omitted.) Accord, Allred v. Rabon, 1977 OK 216, ¶ 11 , 572 P.2d 979, 981 . Moreover: ... … See, e.g., Bankers Trust Co. v. Brown, 2005 OK CIV APP 1 , 107 P.3d 609 ; First Nat’l. Bank and Trust v. Kissee, 1993 OK 96 , 859 P.2d 502 ; Rodgers v. Tecumseh Bank, 1988 OK 36 , 756 P.2d 1223 ; Hall v. Farmers Ins.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • HERNANDEZ v. EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT CORP.

    2022 OK CIV APP 21 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · May 6, 2022

    HERNANDEZ v. … Vasek v. Board of County Comm'rs , , ¶14, (emphasis added). ¶11 In Young , the plaintiff sought to assert a Burk tort as an alternative remedy for her retaliation claim.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Chartney v. City of Choctaw

    441 P.3d 173 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 18, 2019

    See also Sunray DX Oil Co. v. Brown , 1970 OK 183 , ¶ 21, 477 P.2d 67 . II. … See Boyles v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In re Cottonwood Creek Conservancy District No. 11

    465 P.2d 782 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 30, 1969

    In Bridal v. … this Court affirmed the judgment of the district court which approved the establishment of the conservancy district; and also affirmed that court’s approval of the “Plans For Works Improvements” submitted by the District’s Board

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Buntin v. Sheffield Steel

    707 P.2d 557 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 18, 1985

    Such phenomenon was judicially recognized with respect to a loss of hearing situation in Southwest Factories, Inc. v. Eaton, 453 P.2d 1021 (Okl.1969). 1 It was enlarged upon in Munsingwear, Inc. v. … As we pointed out in Wilson Foods Corp. v.

    Overruled in part by Coy v. Dover Corp./Norris Division, 1989 Okla. LEXIS 84 (1989)Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Knight v. Allied Signal

    70 O.B.A.J. 1250 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 10, 1998

    City of Bethany v. Public Employees Relations Board of the State of Oklahoma, 1995 OK 99 , 904 P.2d 604 . … Speer v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • CARNAHAN v. CHESAPEAKE OPERATING, INC.

    347 P.3d 753 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 28, 2014

    Spencer v. … Woodall v. Chandler Material Co., [ 1986 OK 4 ], 716 P.2d 652 (Okla.1986)." Rogers v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.