Case law

In Re Estate of Geller

70 O.B.A.J. 1375 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 12, 1999

Board of Regents of Okla. Agric. Colleges v. Updegraff, 205 Okla. 301 , 237 P.2d 131 (1951), rev’d on other grounds, Wieman v. Updegraff, 344 U.S. 183 , 73 S.Ct. 215 , 97 L.Ed. 216 (1952). … Garner v. Board of Public Works of Los Angeles, 341 U.S. 716, 722 , 71 S.Ct. 909 , 95 L.Ed. 1317 (1951).

Bluejacket v. City of Tulsa

76 O.B.A.J. 1047 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 11, 2005

(b) Unless otherwise provided by law, proceedings for review of a judgment or final order shall be commenced by filing a petition in the district court of the county where the inferior tribunal, board or officer rendered … See also, Ford v. West, 2003 OK CIV APP 94 , 78 P.3d 1245 .

Patterson v. Beall

68 O.B.A.J. 3680 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 19, 1997

Curtis v. Board of Education of Sayre Public Schools, 1995 OK 119 , 914 P.2d 656 . … Lincoln Bank and Trust Company v.

Bellah v. Bellah

70 O.B.A.J. 2113 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · May 20, 1999

V, § 54. An “accrued right” is defined as “a matured cause of action or legal authority to demand redress.” Barry v. Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County, 173 Okla. 645 , 49 P.2d 548, 550 (1935). … Welch v. Armer, 1989 OK 117 , 776 P.2d 847 . As a substantive right, the denial or repeal thereof cannot be retroactively effected. Welch, 1989 OK 117, ¶ 27 , 776 P.2d at 850 .

Blankenship v. Bone

530 P.2d 578 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 20, 1975

Defendants say that the Supreme Court of Oklahoma held in Town of Ames v. … Bd. of County Com’rs, Creek County v. Casteel, supra. Cf. Wrightsman v. Southwestern Natural Gas Co., 173 Okl. 75 , 46 P.2d 925 (1935), as cited in Town of Ames v. Wybrant, 220 P.2d at 695 .

Sauders v. Mangum Nursing Center, LLC

377 P.3d 180 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 11, 2016

STANDARD OF REVIEW 110 Our review of a motion to dismiss involves de novo consideration of whether the amended petition is legally sufficient, Fanning v. Brown, 2004 OK 7, ¶ 4 , 85 P.3d 841 . In Tuffy's Inc. v. … Williams Companies, Inc. v. Dunkelgod, 2012 OK 96, ¶ 18 , 295 P.3d 1107 . In Cole v.

Crum v. Clark

465 P.2d 809 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 6, 1970

In Walton v. … Hansen v. Cunningham, supra.

SMITH v. SHELTER MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.

325 P.3d 26 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 31, 2013

Residential Funding Real Estate Holdings, LLC v. Adams, 2012 OK 49, ¶ 17 , 279 P.3d 788, 793-94 . See Kluver v. Weatherford Hosp. … OAC 165:80-15-4(a) See Mize v. Liberty Mut. Ins.

Meistrell v. McPhail

788 P.2d 1387 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 26, 1989

Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Davidson, 194 Okla. 115 , 148 P.2d 468 (1944). … Theissen v. Watonga Municipal Hospital Board, 550 P.2d 938 (Okla.1976). The publication Plaintiff alleges as libelous was a communication between members of the credentials committee of St. John’s.

Metroplex Properties, L.L.C. v. Oral Roberts University

69 O.B.A.J. 1900 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 6, 1998

See A-Plus Janitorial & Carpet Cleaning v. … See Wofford v. Eastern State Hosp., 1990 OK 77 , 795 P.2d 516 ; Rose v. Sapulpa Rural Water Co., 1981 OK 85 , 631 P.2d 752 .

Beal v. Western Farmers Electric Cooperative

228 P.3d 538 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 15, 2009

Brown, 2004 OK 7, ¶ 4 , 85 P.3d 841 , 844: The standard of review for an order dismissing a case for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted is de movo and involves consideration of whether a plaintiff's … Also, see Baldwin v.

Weatherly v. Flournoy

67 O.B.A.J. 3653 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 10, 1996

In Dippel v. … Southard v.

Robertson v. STATE EX REL. DPS

162 P.3d 936 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 30, 2007

Villines v. Szczepanski, 2005 OK 63, ¶ 8 , 122 P.3d 466, 470 ; Booth v. McKnight, 2003 OK 49, ¶ 12 , 70 P.3d 855, 860 . … He cites two Pennsylvania cases, Schuetz v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 753 A.2d 915 (Comm.Ct.Penn., 2000) and Smith v.

Dale v. City of Yukon

618 P.2d 954 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 16, 1980

Ionic Petroleum Limited v. Third Finance Corp., Okl., 411 P.2d 492 (1966); Kelough v. Neff, Okl., 382 P.2d 135 (1963). … Thompson v. North, Okl., 129 P.2d 1011 (1942). Petitions seeking injunctive relief are subject to demurrers. Board of Governors of Registered Dentists v. Melton, Okl., 428 P.2d 205 (1967).

Sheppard v. Thompson

463 P.2d 346 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 26, 1969

In Brown v. … In Sarkeys v.

State Ex Rel. Protective Health Services v. Billings Fairchild Center, Inc.

214 P.3d 817 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 5, 2009

Protective Health Services v. … Brown v. Curtis, 2008 OK CIV APP 47 , 71 P.3d 34 . A finding of abuse requires that the trial court made a clearly erroneous conclusion and judgment against reason and evidence. Meadows v.

Shirley v. Shirley

104 P.3d 1142 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 28, 2004

And in Gardner v. … Russell v. Board of County Commissioners of Carter County, State of Oklahoma, 2000 OK CIV APP 21 , 1 P.3d 442 .

Pittman v. City of Tulsa ex rel. LaFortune

591 P.2d 339 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 23, 1979

He refers to Robbins v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, Okl., 461 P.2d 610 (1969) as authority for the rule that certification of a transcript by a court reporter is not essential to perfect a § 951 appeal. … To the contrary, Robbins , the one case cited by Pittman in support of his position, suggests that a transcript of proceedings before various boards and agencies need not be prepared, nor its correctness certified to, by

Edwards v. PAYNE EXPLORATION, INC.

259 P.3d 909 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · May 6, 2011

He has standing to seek rescission of the contract only under the same condition. 2 In Oil Capital Racing Ass'n, Inc. v. … ."), and Henry v.

Roberts v. City of Bethany

668 P.2d 350 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 13, 1977

In Claxton v. … In Braine v.