Case law

Opinion No. 66-185

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 17, 1966

OPINION — AG — QUESTION(1): CAN THE OKLAHOMA STATE BOARD OF EMBALMERS AND FUNERAL DIRECTORS ACCEPT THE CONFERENCE GRADES FOR A LICENSE? … — THE OKLAHOMA STATE BOARD OF EMBALMERS AND FUNERAL DIRECTORS MAY NOT DELEGATE ITS DUTY TO DETERMINE THE QUALIFICATIONS OF APPLICANTS FOR LICENSES ISSUED BY THE BOARD TO ANY INDEPENDENT AGENCY OR ASSOCIATION; HENCE, THE BOARD

Opinion No. (1987) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 6, 1987

THE APPLICATION OF THE STATUTORY DEFINITION OF THE PRACTICE OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE IS A FACTUAL DETERMINATION WHICH YOUR BOARD IS FAR MORE QUALIFIED TO MAKE THAN THIS OFFICE, BASED ON THE FACTS OF EACH CASE.

Opinion No. Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 3, 1987

OPINION — AG — ** LICENSURE — CRIMINAL SANCTIONS — JURISDICTION ** UNDER 59 O.S. 46 .7 [ 59-46.7 ](10) THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF LICENSED ARCHITECTS AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS OF OKLAHOMA HAS THE AUTHORITY AND JURISDICTION

Opinion No. (1988)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 21, 1988

THAT OPINION WAS ASKED TO CONSIDER WHETHER NURSING HOMES WERE TO BE LEGALLY DEEMED "HOSPITALS", FOR THE PURPOSE OF REGULATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF SUCH NURSING HOMES BY THE BOARD. … THE BOARD COULD NOT ADOPT RULES THAT WOULD CONTRAVENE THE STATUTORY LANGUAGE IN QUESTION, AND, THEREFORE, THE QUESTION TO YOUR INQUIRY IS NEGATIVE.

Opinion No. (1998)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 21, 1998

Board of Regents of University of Oklahoma v. Baker, 638 P.2d 464 , 467 (Okla. 1981). … Hannan v. Board of Education of City of Lawton, 107 P. 646 (Okla. 1909).

Opinion No. (2009)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 13, 2009

Brown: This office has received your request for an official Attorney General Opinion in which you ask, in effect, the following questions: 1. … Cartwright v. Georgia-Pac.

Opinion No. (1994)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 12, 1994

Brown at 1042, citing Beqich v. Jefferson, 441 P.2d 27,33 (Alaska 1968). The Court in Brown also looked back to its case of Wimberly v. … Brown at 1042.

Opinion No. 75-253 (1975) Ag Part I of Part II

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 25, 1975

See Rush v. Brown, 187 Okl. 97 , 101 P.2d 262 , and also in the case of Harris v. State, ex rel. … (Emphasis added) In Brown v.

Opinion No. 74-141 (1975) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 27, 1975

In the case of Brown v. … Tulsa Exposition and Fair Corporation v.

Opinion No. (2003)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 15, 2003

Brown v. City of Warr Acres, 946 P.2d 1140 , 1144 (Okla. 1997). Absent a showing of fraud or arbitrariness, a finding by a governing body that a project serves a public purpose will not be disturbed by the courts. … Brown v. City of Warr Acres, 946 P.2d 1140 , 1144 (Okla. 1997); Grimes v. City of Oklahoma City, 49 P.3d 719 , 726 (Okla. 2002).

Opinion No. 69-220 (1969) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 17, 1969

See also, Brown v. State Election Board, Ok 1., 369 P.2d 140 (1962). … Co., v.

Opinion No. 73-176 (1973) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 22, 1973

County Board of Adjustment. … The authority of the Boards of Adjustment is the subject of the Supreme Court's ruling in the case of Brown v.

Opinion No. 69-203 (1969) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 20, 1969

It is a well recognized principle of law, as stated in the eleventh paragraph of the syllabus of Shaw v. … See also, Brown v. State Election Board, Okl., 369 P.2d 140 (1962).

Opinion No. 76-180 (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 22, 1976

The Parker v. Brown doctrine has been followed regularly. … Jarvis v. State Board of Barber Examiners, Okl., 83 P.2d 560 , 561 (1938).

Opinion No. 71-105 (1971) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 25, 1971

In answer to your first question, it is clear that each elector in a School Board Election is required to be registered with the County Election Board. … Brown v. State Election Board, Okla., 369 P.2d 140 .

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 23, 1952

V. … BOARD OF EDUCATION' — UNCONSTITUTIONAL `SEPARATE BUT EQUAL') CITE: 70 O.S.H. 4-22 (J. H. JOHNSON)

Opinion No. 71-416 (1972) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 15, 1972

Shaw v. Grumbine, 137 Okl. 95 , 278 P. 311 , applies the same rule to public officers generally. See also: Brown v. State Election Board, Okl., 369 P.2d 140 , and Tulsa Exposition and Fair Corporation v. … See also Hazlett v. Board of Commissioners of Muskogee County, 168 Okl. 290 , 32 P.2d 940 .

Opinion No. (1979) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 11, 1979

Brown v. State Election Board, Okl., 369 P.2d 140 ; Shaw v. Grumbine, 137 Okl. 95 , 278 P. 311 ; National Surety Company v. Sand Springs State Bank, 74 Okl. 176 , 177 P. 574 . ". . . … The county commissioners are prohibited under Tulsa Exposition and Fair Corporation v. Board of County Commissioners, supra, from conferring any power not expressly authorized by statute.

Opinion No. (2004)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 15, 2004

As held in Sublett v. City of Tulsa, 405 P.2d 185 , 197 (Okla. 1965) and State ex rel. Brown v. … Brown v. City of Warr Acres, 946 P.2d 1140 , 1144 (Okla. 1997); Way v. Grand Lake Ass'n, Inc., 635 P.2d 1010 , 1018 (Okla. 1981). 3.

Opinion No. (1979)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 11, 1979

Brown v. State Election Board, Okla., 369 P.2d 140 ; Shaw v. Grumbine, 137 Okla. 95 , 278 P. 311 ; National Surety Company v. Sand Springs State Bank, 74 Okla. 176 , 177 P. 574 . ". . . … The county commissioners are prohibited under Tulsa Exposition and Fair Corporation v. Board of County Commissioners, supra, from conferring any power not expressly authorized by statute.