Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,251 results
0.73s
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 9, 1990
FIRST NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY OF CHICKASHA V. UNITED STATES, 462 F.2D 908 (1972), ALFALFA ELECTRIC COOP. INC.. V. FIRST NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA CITY, 525 P.2D 644 (1974). … IN GRACE V. DOUGLAS COUNTY, 143 N.W.2D 818, 178 NEB. 690, "FULL TIME" WAS DEFINED AS: ". . .
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 9, 1968
In Southern Surety Co. v. Equitable Surety Co., 84 Okl. 23 , 202 P. 295 , the Oklahoma Supreme Court cited Chatham Real Estate Improvement Co. v. … Southern Surety Co., v. Equitable Surety Co., supra, also quoted extensively from Green v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 5, 1980
See O'Dell v. Kunkel's, Inc., 581 P.2d 878 , 881 (Okl. 1978). … London Square Village v. Oklahoma County Equalization and Excise Board, 559 P.2d 1224 (Okl. 1977).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 25, 1979
Referring to 70 O.S. 17 -108 [ 70-17-108 ] (1978), the pertinent part thereof states as follows: "Each local school district, or state college or university, or State Board of Education or State Board of Vocational Education … See Barnes v. Transok Pipeline Co., Okl., 549 P.2d 819 (1976).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 10, 1949
BILL EMPOWERS THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WOODS COUNTY, TO CONVEY TO THE CITY OF ALVA, OKLAHOMA, BY GOOD AND SUFFICIENT INSTRUMENT OF CONVEYANCE, UPON SUCH TERMS AND FOR SUCH CONSIDERATION AS TO SAID BOARD MAY DEEM … THE BILL IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL UNDER ARTICLE V, SECTION 46 (SPECIAL LAW).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 20, 1977
Bohn v. Divine, Okl. App., 544 P.2d 916 (1975). … American First National Trust v. First Fidelity Savings Loan, 415 P.2d 930 (Kansas 1965).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 26, 1979
Dear Chairman Garrision, This office is in receipt of your letter dated January 24, 1979, wherein you ask the Attorney General for an opinion regarding the following questions: Is the Oklahoma State Board of Public Accountancy … discussing the above section's applicability to the need to have the public's business conducted in the open, and the principal of attorney confidentiality, the Supreme Court in Oklahoma Association of Municipal Attorneys v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 11, 1975
DUAL OFFICE HOLDING A member of the board of education of a school district may not concurrently serve as a member of a metropolitan planning commission established pursuant to 19 O.S. 863 .1 [ 19-863.1 ] (1971), et seq. … held to be a public office within the meaning of the dual-office holding statute in Attorney General Opinion 70-228 which relied upon the following rules set out in paragraphs 2 and 3 of the syllabus by the Court in State v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 25, 1980
In re: Certification of Question of State Law, 560 P.2d 195 (Okla. 1977); Nickkel v. Stifel, Nicolaus Co., Inc., 542 P.2d 1305 (Okla. 1975). … Ridley Packing Company v. Holliday, 476 P.2d 480 , 482 (Okla. 1970). The statutory language found in 10 O.S. 361 [ 10-361 ] and 10 O.S. 362 [ 10-362 ] (1971) is clear.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 9, 1996
Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. … Pulliam v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 19, 1977
In Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. … West v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 21, 1980
OPINION — AG — (1) THE OKLAHOMA LEGISLATURE CAN CONSTITUTIONALLY REQUIRE THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF A MUNICIPAL FIREMEN'S RELIEF AND PENSION FUND TO TRANSFER THEIR RESERVE FUND TO A NEWLY CREATED STATE FUND. (2) THE OKLAHOMA … 36, 11 O.S. 1977 Supp., 49-101 [ 11-49-101 ], 11 O.S. 1977 Supp., 59-102 [11-59-102] (JOHN PAUL JOHNSON) ARTICLE V, SECTION 36, ARTICLE V, SECTION 41, ARTICLE V, SECTION 36, ARTICLE V, SECTION 41, ARTICLE X, SECTION 15
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 27, 1971
In Board of Education of City of Drumright v. … The case of Board of Education of City of Drumright v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 26, 1975
See Board of Education Independent School District No. 1 v. Clendenning, Okl., 431 P.2d 382 (1967) and Board of Education of Dependent School District No. 32 v. … Oklahoma State Board of Education, Okl., 521 P.2d 390 (1974).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 14, 1992
See Donovan v. Walton, 609 F.Supp. 1221 (D.Fla. 1985); Whitfield v. … Accord Lynch v. J.P.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 20, 1989
THE TERM "INDIRECT INTEREST", SUCH AS USED IN ARTICLE V, SECTION 23, HAS SIMILARLY BEEN VERY LIBERALLY CONSTRUED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL THROUGH THE YEARS. … IN ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION NO. 79-202, IT WAS OPINED: "A MEMBER OF A WATER BOARD IS "INDIRECTLY INTERESTED" IN A CONTRACT LET BY THE BOARD WHEN A MEMBER HAS OR IS LIKELY TO HAVE A PECUNIARY OR PERSONAL INTEREST IN THE CONTRACT
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 25, 1975
JURY SERVICE — TEACHERS A board of education may not adopt a policy granting to a teacher who serves on a jury leave with pay reduced by the amount received for jury service. … that the constitutionality of an Alabama statute requiring employers to pay employees serving as jurors their usual compensation less that received as jurors was recently upheld by the United States Supreme Court in Dean v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 26, 1979
This office is in receipt of your letter dated January 24, 1979, wherein you ask the Attorney General for an opinion regarding the following questions: Is the Oklahoma State Board of Public Accountancy required to deliberate … discussing the above section's applicability to the need to have the public's business conducted in the open, and the principal of attorney confidentiality, the Supreme Court in Oklahoma Association of Municipal Attorneys v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 21, 1990
BOARDS CREATED BY STATUTE MAY ONLY EXERCISE THE POWERS GRANTED BY STATUTE. BOYDSTON V. STATE, 2,7 P.2D 133, 142 (OKLA. 1954). … MARLEY V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 15, 1974
sold and issued to eligible recipients of the county in pursuance of an agreement for such purpose entered into by the board with the Oklahoma Public Welfare Commission. … It is well settled that state boards and commissions as creatures of the law have only such powers as are granted by the law. See Boydston v. State, Okl., 277 P.2d 138 .
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna