Case law

Opinion No. (1989)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 14, 1989

Simons v. Benson, 244 P.2d 1126 (Okla. 1952). … Independent School District No. 89 of Oklahoma County v.

Opinion No. 76-158 (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 14, 1976

Baker v. Carter, 165 Okl. 116 , 25 P.2d 247 ; Sheldon v. Grand River Dam Authority, 182 Okl. 24 , 76 P.2d 355 . … See Gibbons v. Ogden, 9 Wheat. 1 , 6 L.Ed.2d 23 (1824); McCulloch v. Maryland, 4 Wheat. 316 , 4 L.Ed. 579 (1819).

Opinion No. (1989)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 12, 1989

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL HAS RECEIVED YOUR LETTER ASKING ON BEHALF OF YOUR BOARD FOR AN OFFICIAL OPINION ON WHETHER 11 O.S. 49 -100.1(7) (1988), DEFINING "NORMAL RETIREMENT DATE," IS GOOD AUTHORITY FOR THE BOARD'S LONGSTANDING … CJ-89-3441 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY, CARL SMITH V. OKLAHOMA POLICE PENSION AN RETIREMENT BOARD, THE EXACT SAME LANGUAGE DEFINING "NORMAL RETIREMENT DATE" AS FOUND IN THE STATUTE YOU CITE IS AT ISSUE.

Opinion No. 77-235 (1977) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 20, 1977

Bohn v. Divine, Okl. App., 544 P.2d 916 (1975). … American First National Trust v. First Fidelity Savings Loan, 415 P.2d 930 (Kansas 1965).

Question Submitted by: Senator Mary B. Boren, Oklahoma State Senate, District 16

2024 OK AG 5 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 28, 2024

Hatfield v. Jimerson, 1961 OK 250, ¶ 9, 365 P.2d 980, 982 (quoting State ex rel. Tayrien v. … , Transportation Commission, ODOT County Advisory Board, ODOT Tribal Advisory Board, Committee on the Pilot Shortage, Highway Construction Materials Technician Certification Board, Interstate Midwest Reginal Passenger Rail

Opinion No. 73-136 (1973) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 5, 1973

The reasoning of the Goble case, supra, parallels that of the case of Peterson v. … (See Moral Insurance Company v. Cooksey, 285 P.2d 222 (1955).

Opinion No. (1988)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 12, 1988

THE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION REGULATIONS FOR ADMINISTRATION AND HANDBOOK ON BUDGETING AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT BULLETIN NO. 145-V, AND SPECIFICALLY SECTION II OF THE REGULATIONS GOVERNING SCHOOL TRANSPORTATION STATE, IN PERTINENT … SEE BROOKS V. WOODS, 640 P.2D 1000, AT 1002 (OKLA. APP. 1981). IN LINE WITH THIS REASONING, CHARGING A FEE FOR THE TRANSPORTATION OF STUDENTS WHICH LIVE WITHIN THE DISTANCE IN QUESTION DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE PROHIBITED.

Opinion No. (1997)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 2, 1997

AMF Tubescope v. Hatchel, 547 P.2d 374 , 379 (Okla. 1976). Further, the Legislature "will not be presumed to have intended an absurd result." … TXO Production Corp. v.

Opinion No. (1992)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 14, 1992

See Donovan v. Walton, 609 F.Supp. 1221 (D.Fla. 1985); Whitfield v. … Accord Lynch v. J.P.

Opinion No. 75-285 (1975) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 13, 1975

King v. White, 170 Okl. 126 , 39 P.2d 69 (1935)- McLean v. State, 95 Okl. Cr. 271 , 244 P.2d 335 (1952). … Williamson v. Evans, Okl., 319 P.2d 1112 (1958); Reubin v. Thompson, Okl., 406 P.2d 263 (1965).

Opinion No. 73-166 (1973) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 31, 1973

Key County Election Board of Oklahoma County v. Donnell, 107 Okla. 159 , 231 P. 546 ." … Also in Pyette v. Board of Regents of University of Oklahoma, 102 F.

Opinion No. 80-203 (1980) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 21, 1980

The pertinent part of this provision is: "* * * The board shall, for the purposes stated in this paragraph, advertise for bids on any such bulk item to be purchased where the amount involved will exceed One Thousand Five … Woods v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 207 Okl. 490 , 251 P.2d 505 (1953). This merely means that the materials must be procured from the successful bidder.

Opinion No. 78-292 (1978) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 14, 1978

In this same subsection, we find a provision for the exercise of an elector's vote by a corporation when its board of directors has so authorized by resolution filed with the judge of the election. … may not be expanded by construction, Ridley Packing Co. v.

Opinion No. (2002)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 16, 2002

See Bd. of County Comm'rs v. … (citation omitted); Bd. of County Comm'rs v.

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 30, 1980

PROCESS PURSUANT TO ARTICLE V , SECTION 55 OKLAHOMA CONSTITUTION? … (2) MUST MONEY COLLECTED OR RECEIVED BY THE STATE BOARD, AGENCIES, AND COMMISSIONS AS RELATES TO FEDERAL FUNDS BE DEPOSITED IN THE GENERAL FUND AND APPROPRIATED PURSUANT TO ARTICLE V , SECTION 55 OKLAHOMA CONSTITUTION?

Opinion No. 70-225 (1970) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 26, 1970

In the case of Excise Board, Washita County v. … State ex rel., Board of Education of City of Tulsa v.

Opinion No. 75-319 (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 9, 1976

As authority for this statement of law, C.J.S. cites the case of Texas Liquor Control Board v. Cannon, 147 S.W.2d 927 , (1941), which this office likewise finds persuasive. … In Texas Liquor Control Board v. Cannon, supra, the court distinguished between licenses issued purely for revenue purposes and ones issued to insure the public health and welfare.

Opinion No. 76-177 (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 23, 1976

Citing Kay County Excise Board v. Atchison, T S. F. R. Co., Okl., 91 P.2d 1087 (1939). "Necessary" is liberally construed in Kay County Excise Board v. Atchison, T. S. F. Railway Company, supra. … But, as the Ninth Circuit put it somewhat brutally in Pineda v.

Opinion No. 77-197 (1978) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 23, 1978

You further refer this office to the Supreme Court decision of Cox v. … Dillingham, supra, in order to avoid the necessity of a hearing before the County Board of Equalization and appeal therefrom. In distinguishing the Cox et al. v.

Opinion No. 73-308 (1974) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 15, 1974

sold and issued to eligible recipients of the county in pursuance of an agreement for such purpose entered into by the board with the Oklahoma Public Welfare Commission. … It is well settled that state boards and commissions as creatures of the law have only such powers as are granted by the law. See Boydston v. State, Okl., 277 P.2d 138 .