Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,251 results
1.60s
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 1, 2000
. ¶ 3 In Calvey v. … V , § 33 . See Calvey v. Daxon, 997 P.2d 164 (Okla. 2000).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 17, 1992
THE BOARD OF MEDICOLEGAL INVESTIGATIONS IS AUTHORIZED TO ACCEPT GRANTS, GIFTS, FEES OR FUNDS FROM PERSONS, ASSOCIATIONS, CORPORATIONS, OR FOUNDATIONS FOR ANY PURPOSE AUTHORIZED BY THE BOARD. B. … MINDEMANN V. INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 6 OF CADDO COUNTY, 771 P.2D 996, 1001 (OKLA.1989).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 9, 1968
This section creates a County Review Board to study applications for nursing home licenses. The board is to be composed of (a) the local health officer, (b) the county welfare director, and (c) the county clerk. … Board of Education of Okmulgee v. State Board of Education, 201 Okl. 32 , 200 P.2d 394 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 23, 1976
In the case of Riley v. … In the case of O'Neal v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 27, 1979
The State Employees Group Health and Life Insurance Board may also extend dependent life insurance in an amount to be determined by the Board to each insured employee who elects to insure his eligible dependents. … Janes v. Janes, Okl. 21 P.2d 500 (1933); Whitney v. Whitney, 134 P.2d 357 (1943); Blunt v. Blunt, 176 P.2d 471 (1947).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 27, 1979
The State Employees Group Health and Life Insurance Board may also extend dependent life insurance in an amount to be determined by the Board to each insured employee who elects to insure his eligible dependents. … Janes v. Janes, Okla. 21 P.2d 500 (1933); Whitney v. Whitney, 134 P.2d 357 (1943); Blunt v. Blunt, 176 P.2d 471 (1947).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 24, 1995
Jackson v. … Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Oklahoma County, 618 P.2d 915 , 919 (Okla. 1980). See also Independent School District No. 1 v. Board of County Commissioners, 674 P.2d 547 (Okla. 1983) and City of Tulsa v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 26, 1973
Under the rule of statutory construction announced in McVicker v. … Also, in Bridal v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 26, 1969
Polk v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, Okl., 420 P.2d 520 (1966) and Taff v. State, Okl., 425 P.2d 970 (1966). … Those statutes do not authorize the incorporation of such associations or "fair boards". The eleventh paragraph of the syllabus of Shaw v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 5, 1976
As to other entities under 74 O.S. 902 [ 74-902 ](14) who are or may become eligible employers no formal agreement to contribute is required as stated in Oklahoma Public Employees Retirement System v. … The action available to the Board of Trustees however may depend upon the status of the employee at the time it becomes known to the Board.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 29, 1958
OPINION — AG — IN THE FACT SITUATION HEREINABOVE OUTLINED, INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 14 OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, OKLAHOMA, IS NOT ENTITLED TO RECEIVE ANY PART OF THE PROCEEDS OF THE SALE, BY THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF INDEPENDENT … V. BOARD OF EDUCATION ( 99 P.2d 876 ) ETC . . . .
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 14, 1992
TULSA EXPOSITION FAIR CORPORATION V. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, 468 P.2D 501, 507 (OKLA.1970); BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY V. WARRAM, 385 P.2D 1034 (OKLA.1955). … BECAUSE THE LEGISLATURE IS PRESUMED NEVER TO DO A VAIN THING, FARRIS V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 13, 2005
Co. v. Ottawa County Excise Board, 207 P.2d 275 , 277 (Okla. 1949) and Black v. … The money is "appropriated" by the county commissioners when its estimate of needs is approved by the county excise board. 68 O.S. 2001 , § 3010[ 68-3010 ]; see Summey v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 23, 1972
** Summary ** SOURCES FOR SALARY OF COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Pursuant to 70 O.S. 4 -103 [ 70-4-103 ] (1971), the State Board of Education is to pay to a county superintendent an amount equal to the difference between … The Supreme Court in construing this provision of the Constitution, enunciated the rule in Tulsa v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 31, 1978
been designated as the purchasing officer by the governing board. … Dairy v. Allen, 188 Okl. 287 , 108 P.2d 164 (1940), as repealing all prior general laws, or parts thereof, which are repugnant to, and inconsistent and irreconcilable with the repealing statute.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 5, 1976
In the case of City of Danville v. Chesapeake and O. Ry. Co., 34 F. Supp. 620 , 637 (D.C. … Co. v. Kelly, 36 S.Ct. 630 , 241 U.S. 485 , 60 L.Ed. 1117 (1915), and Gelco Builders and Burjay Construction Corp. v. Simpson Factors Corp., 301 N.Y.S.2d 728 , 60 Misc. 2 nd 492 (1969).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 19, 1968
Outgoing County Commissioner — Vote — Lease Purchase Contracts Title 19 O.S. 333 [ 19-333 ](B) (1968) prohibits an outgoing County Commissioner from participating in a Board of County Commissioner's decision to make early … See Western Paint and Chemical Co. v. Board of Commissioners of Kingfisher County, 172 Okl. 599 , P.2d 543.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 15, 1968
This language is mandatory and indicates that the board of education of each school district in the state must adopt a plan providing for sick leave benefits for teachers. In the case of State ex rel. Ogden v. … A substitute teacher shall be paid in an amount and under such terms as may be agreed upon in advance by the substitute teacher, the regular teacher and the board of education or according to — — regulations of the board.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 10, 1948
COUNTY HEALTH OFFICER — CITY COUNCILMAN ** QUESTION(1): IS THE POSITION OF ACTING HARMON COUNTY HEALTH OFFICER, CLASSIFIED AS AN OFFICE UNDER THE LAWS OF THIS STATE (ARTICLE II , SECTION 12 OKLAHOMA CONSTITUTION); GIBSON V. … (FEDERAL EMPLOYEE, COUNTY OFFICER, VACATED FIRST OFFICE) SEE: GIBSON V. CROWDER, DEALS WITH: A CITY TREASURER ACCEPTED AN APPOINTMENT OR ELECTED AS A MEMBER OF A SCHOOL BOARD.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 17, 1949
TAXATION FOR THE YEAR FOR WHICH SUCH ASSESSMENT WAS MADE HAD BEEN FINALLY ADJUSTED AND EQUALIZED, TO REDUCE SUCH ASSESSMENT AND/OR THE TAXES BASED THEREON, THE SAME WOULD BE UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND VOID AS VIOLATIVE OF ARTICLE V, … (AD VALOREM TAXATION, ERRORS) CITE: 68 O.S. 15 .8 [68-15.8] 68 O.S. 15 .55 [68-15.55], 68 O.S. 15 .56 [68-15.56] 68 O.S. 184 [68-184], ARTICLE V, SECTION 53, ARTICLE X, SECTION 8 NOTE: CODIFICATION MISTAKE.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna