Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersoklaag

2,251 results

1.06s

  • Opinion No.

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 23, 1976

    OPINION — AG — PURSUANT TO THE DECISIONS OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT (VIRGINIA STATE BOARD OF PHARMACY ET AL. V. … THE BOARD FROM ADOPTING SUCH RULES AND REGULATIONS.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Question Submitted by: The Honorable John Haste, Oklahoma State Senate, District 36

    2024 OK AG 4 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 28, 2024

    Riley v. State, ex rel. McDaniel , 1914 OK 251, 141 P. 264; Burford v. Board of Comm'rs , 1917 OK 40, 162 P. 780; Welch v. Key , 1961 OK 201, 365 P.2d 154. … CHILDERS Discussed 1917 OK 40, 162 P. 780, 63 Okla. 42, BURFORD v. BOARD OF COM'RS OF LINCOLN COUNTY Discussed 2001 OK 110, 37 P.3d 882, 72 OBJ 3672, KEATING v. EDMONDSON Discussed 1961 OK 201, 365 P.2d 154, WELCH v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 10, 1967

    CITE: ARTICLE V, SECTION 57, 37 O.S. 1961 506 [ 37-506 ](24), 37 O.S. 1961 519 [ 37-519 ] (PENN LERBLANCE) FILENAME: m0000983 ROY PARHAM OKLAHOMA ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL BOARD ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OKLAHOMA — OPINION JULY … CITE: ARTICLE V, SECTION 57, 37 O.S. 1961 506 [ 37-506 ](24), 37 O.S. 1961 519 [ 37-519 ] (PENN LERBLANCE)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1990)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 23, 1990

    NO. 79-267; SEE ALSO, BASKIN V. STATE EX REL. SHORT, 232 P. 388 (OKLA. 1925); MACKEY V. CRUMS, 153 P. 1128 (OKLA. 1915). … THE BOARD MEMBER MAY WANT TO CONSIDER WHETHER BEING ON THE GIVING AND RECEIVING END OF A GRANT APPEARS IMPROPER.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1999)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 20, 1999

    See Adams v. Fry, 230 P.2d 915 , 917 (Okla. 1951). … See Grand River Dam Authority v. State, 645 P.2d 1011 , 1019 (Okla. 1982).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 68-365 (1968) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 27, 1968

    This was exemplified in the case of Hawks v. … N or shall the Legislature make 'any grant to any retiring officer, Article V, Section 47 Constitution. . . .'"

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 76-118 (1976) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 15, 1976

    In the many opinions issued subsequent to the April 8, 1944, opinion and the Supreme Court ruling in State v. … This result was found to be in accordance with the provisions and intent of 51 O.S. 24 [ 51-24 ], and State v. Nix, supra.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 20, 1971

    O.S. 1970 Supp., 3208 [ 70-3208 ], THE OKLAHOMA REGENTS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION HAVE THE POWER TO DETERMINE AND/OR CHANGE THE FUNCTIONS OF AN INSTITUTION IN THE OKLAHOMA SYSTEM FOR HIGHER EDUCATION; (2) PURSUANT TO ARTICLE V, … AN INSTITUTION WITHIN THE OKLAHOMA STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION; (4) FURTHER, THE LEGISLATURE HAS THE POWER TO REMOVE AN INSTITUTION FROM ONE GOVERNING BOARD AND TO PLACE SAID INSTITUTION UNDER ANOTHER BOARD NEWLY ESTABLISHED

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 20, 1980

    Alfalfa Co. v. … Mitchener v. City Cmr's. of City of Okmulgee, 100 Okl. 98 , 228 P. 159 (1924); Worley v. French, 184 Okl. 116 , 85 P.2d 296 (1938); Board of Education of Okla. City v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1985)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 19, 1985

    The basic principle concerning the power of an administrative board to adopt rules and regulations was expressed by the Oklahoma Supreme Court in W.S. Dickey Clay Mfg. Co. v. Ferguson Inv. … See, Adams v. Professional Practices Comm ., 524 P.2d 932 (Okla. 1974). Similarly, rules must be promulgated in aid of and not in the derogation of legislative purposes.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 76-128 (1976) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 18, 1976

    to hold positions created under such Boards or Commissions by this Act, and the said persons so appointed shall hold office at the will of such officer, Boards or Commissions making said appointment, provided that any Board … The United States Supreme Court in Sugarman v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 68-326 (1968) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 15, 1968

    This language is mandatory and indicates that the board of education of each school district in the state must adopt a plan providing for sick leave benefits for teachers. In the case of State ex rel. Ogden v. … A substitute teacher shall be paid in an amount and under such terms as may be agreed upon in advance by the substitute teacher, the regular teacher and the board of education or according to — — regulations of the board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 31, 1962

    " IN THE STATE TREASURY TO THE CREDIT OF THE BOARD, WHERE SAME CAN BE WITHDRAWN, AS PROVIDED IN 62 O.S. 1961 7.4 [62-7.4], ONLY "ON THE VOUCHER OF THE AUTHORITY MAKING SUCH DEPOSIT", BUT SAID BOARD MAY CONTINUE TO FOLLOW … ITS PRESENT PRACTICE OF DEPOSITING AND DISBURSING THE FUNDS RECEIVED BY IT, AS PROVIDED IN THE ABOVE PROVISIONS OF 59 O.S. 1961 65 [ 59-65 ] CITE: ARTICLE V, SECTION 55, TEXT OF OPINION APPEARS TO HAVE A MISTYPED STATUTE,

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 73-287 (1974) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 22, 1974

    Smith v. Colson, 31 Okl. 703 , 123 P. 149 (1912), Ritchie v. Raines, Okl. Cr., 374 P.2d 772 (1962). "Expenditure" is normally defined as an actual disbursement or spending of money. Crow v. … Board of Sup'rs. of County of Stanislaus, 135 Cal.App. 451 , 27 P.2d 655 (1933). Merely allowing a booth in the Student Union would not be an "expenditure of public funds" as contemplated by Section 501.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2000)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 1, 2000

    . ¶ 3 In Calvey v. … V , § 33 . See Calvey v. Daxon, 997 P.2d 164 (Okla. 2000).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 76-315 (1976) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 23, 1976

    In the case of Riley v. … In the case of O'Neal v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 79-267 (1979) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 28, 1979

    The contract to purchase the property would be subject to the provisions of 62 O.S. 371 [ 62-371 ] (1971), which provides: "No board of county commissioners, nor city council, nor board of trustees of any township, or town … NOTE: CONFLICT OF INTEREST) ** Disposition : **NOTE: OVERRRULED BY: STATE V. HILLCREST INVESTMENT CORPORATION **

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1995)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 29, 1995

    Jackson v. Independent School Dist. No. 16, 648 P.2d 26 , 29 (Okla. 1982). … Co. v. Dobry Flour Mills, 111 F. Supp. 496 , 499 (W.D.Okla. 1953).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 80-255 (1980) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 5, 1980

    The State Board shall maintain separate accounts for each municipality and each firefighter." … In Wallace v. Childers, 180 P.2d 1005 (Okl. 1947), the Supreme Court of Oklahoma stated: ". . .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1991) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 18, 1991

    MUNICIPAL OFFICERS MAY BE APPOINTED TO CERTAIN BOARDS, 51 O.S. 6 (5)/ 51 O.S. 6 (6) BUT THEY CANNOT BE ELECTED TO A SCHOOL BOARD. … NO. 80-172; GIBSON V. CROWDER, 165 P.2D 628 (OKLA. 1946). I ALSO NOTE THAT YOUR CONSTITUENT IS ADVOCATING A CHANGE IN THE LAW WHICH WOULD ALLOW SUCH DUAL-OFFICE HOLDING.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.