Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersoklaag

2,251 results

1.19s

  • Opinion No. (1991) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 14, 1991

    SUCH SCHOOL BOARDS CAN EXERCISE ONLY THOSE POWERS THAT ARE GRANTED IN EXPRESS WORDS, THOSE FAIRLY IMPLIED IN OR NECESSARILY INCIDENTAL TO THE POWERS EXPRESSLY GRANTED. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF OKLAHOMA CITY V. … N EDWARDS V. BOARD OF EDUCATION, 169 P.2D 1015, 1017 (OKLA. 1946).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 74-192 (1975) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 16, 1975

    To that extent, the legislative intent abrogates the language of Board of County Commissioners, Tulsa County v. Mars, Sheriff, cited supra, relating to profits realized by the sheriff. … Question (6) requests an opinion concerning a holding by the Oklahoma Supreme Court in the case of Board of County Commissioners, Tulsa County v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1990)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 13, 1990

    Matador Pipelines, Inc. v. Oklahoma Water Resources Board, 742 P.2d 15 , 18 (Okla. 1987). … Isaacs v. Oklahoma City, 437 P.2d 229 (Okla. 1966).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 76-311 (1976) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 28, 1976

    Hennessey v. Independent School District No. 4, Lincoln County, 552 P.2d 1141 (1976); Associated Industries of Oklahoma v. Industrial Welfare Commission, 185 Okl. 177 , 90 P.2d 899 (1939), and Glass v. … Furthermore, Tipton v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 79-151 (1979) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 1, 1979

    Local school boards, like all other public agencies, may not accomplish by indirection that which they cannot do directly. … PERCIVAL) (ksg) ** SEE: OPINION NO. 95-014 (1996) ** ** SEE: 829 P.2d 973 (1992), BABB V. IND. SCH. DIST. I-5 **

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2005)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 16, 2005

    Barnhill v. … Grimes v. City of Oklahoma City, 49 P.3d 719 , 724 (Okla. 2002).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1980) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 8, 1980

    governing said school district, and for all other purposes approved by the State Board of Education. … See Vette v. Childers, 102 Okl. 140 , 228 P. 145 (1924).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 10, 1967

    CITE: ARTICLE V, SECTION 57, 37 O.S. 1961 506 [ 37-506 ](24), 37 O.S. 1961 519 [ 37-519 ] (PENN LERBLANCE) FILENAME: m0000983 ROY PARHAM OKLAHOMA ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL BOARD ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OKLAHOMA — OPINION JULY … CITE: ARTICLE V, SECTION 57, 37 O.S. 1961 506 [ 37-506 ](24), 37 O.S. 1961 519 [ 37-519 ] (PENN LERBLANCE)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 69-150 (1969) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 27, 1969

    to employ or appoint attorneys to advise or represent said Officer, Board or Commission, in any matter, and all the legal duties of such Officer, Board or Commission shall devolve upon and are hereby vested in the Attorney … In Darling Apartment Co. v. Springer, 25 Del.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 74-131 (1974) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 29, 1974

    In the recent case of Sugarman v. … In this regard, see also Traux v. Raich, 239 U.S. 33 , at 41 , 60 L.Ed.2d 131 , 36 S.Ct. 7 (1915).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1990)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 23, 1990

    NO. 79-267; SEE ALSO, BASKIN V. STATE EX REL. SHORT, 232 P. 388 (OKLA. 1925); MACKEY V. CRUMS, 153 P. 1128 (OKLA. 1915). … THE BOARD MEMBER MAY WANT TO CONSIDER WHETHER BEING ON THE GIVING AND RECEIVING END OF A GRANT APPEARS IMPROPER.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 76-104 (1976) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 10, 1976

    The State Board of Public Affairs is authorized to use brand names in taking competitive bids. … After recognizing that certain constitutional agencies may be exempt from the Act under the authority of Trapp v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 80-216 (1980) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 18, 1980

    May the corporate officers of a corporation currently holding a valid Funeral Establishment License issued by this Board form, create, or establish a holding company or holding corporation for the purpose of owning and operating … Shenson v. Fresno Meat Packing Co., (Cal. 1950) 216 P.2d 156 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 68-365 (1968) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 27, 1968

    This was exemplified in the case of Hawks v. … N or shall the Legislature make 'any grant to any retiring officer, Article V, Section 47 Constitution. . . .'"

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 77-303 (1978) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 6, 1978

    Firemen's Relief and Pension Board v. Ozment, Okl., 467 P.2d 502 (1970); Roberts, Sr. v. … Board of Trustees of Firemen's Relief and Pension Fund of Leedey, Okl., 292 P.2d 408 (1956); see also In Re Bensox, 178 Okl., 299 , 62 P.2d 962 (1936). Further, in the Supreme Court case of Roberts, Sr. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1979)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 22, 1979

    The State Employees Group Health and Life Insurance Board (hereafter the "Board") is authorized to contract for a claims administrator to process claims arising under the several group insurance plans. … See Wells v. Childers (Okla. 1945) 165 P.2d 371 , 376 . An additional consideration is whether a contract may be let which tends to bind the State of Oklahoma to an agreement to expend future fiscal year funds.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1989)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 3, 1989

    AT YOUR REQUEST, WE HAVE EXAMINED THE ISSUE OF WHETHER THE PROVISIONS OF 74 O.S. 4244 (1988) APPLY TO THE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE OKLAHOMA STUDENT LOAN AUTHORITY. … WE WOULD MOST PARTICULARLY DRAW YOUR ATTENTION TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE V, SECTION 57 OF OKLAHOMA'S CONSTITUTION THAT THE BODY OF THE STATUTE MUST BE GERMANE TO ITS TITLE, THAT AN ACT SHALL EMBRACE BUT ONE SUBJECT,

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1992)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 25, 1992

    CARTWRIGHT V. GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP., 663 P.2D 718 (OKLA. 1982). WORDS IN A STATUTE ARE TO BE GIVEN THEIR ORDINARY MEANING. 25 O.S. 1 (1991). SISNEY V. SMALLEY, 690 P.2D 1048 (OKLA. 1984). … THE POWERS OF A BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ARE SPECIFIED IN 11 O.S. 44 -104 AND DO NOT INCLUDE CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 5, 1981

    FUND STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, ESTIMATE OF FUNDS, SMITH V. … STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, BUDGET, APPROPRIATION, SPECIAL FUND, GRANTS) CITE: ARTICLE X, SECTION 23 (FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING FUNDS) (JOHN PAUL JOHNSON)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 20, 1980

    Alfalfa Co. v. … Mitchener v. City Cmr's. of City of Okmulgee, 100 Okl. 98 , 228 P. 159 (1924); Worley v. French, 184 Okl. 116 , 85 P.2d 296 (1938); Board of Education of Okla. City v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.