Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersoklaag

2,251 results

0.98s

  • Opinion No. (1996)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 5, 1996

    Supp. 1995, § 5-117[ 70-5-117 ], which sets forth the powers and duties of the board of education. … City of Duncan v. Bingham, 394 P.2d 456 , 460 (Okla. 1964).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 72-181 (1972) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 23, 1972

    Special Indemnity Fund v. Harold, Okl., 398 P.2d 827 . … State ex rel Marland v. Phillips Petroleum Company et al, 189 Okl. 629 , 118 P.2d 621 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 68-285

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 8, 1968

    Any action of the committee shall be approved by the Board." … In O'Brien Packing Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 71-158 (1971) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 19, 1971

    Letteer v. … Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1985)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 15, 1985

    Hughes Drilling Co. v. Morgan , 648 P.2d 32 (Okla. 1982). Clearly, then, on its face the Open Meeting Act is applicable to the Board of Regents of Seminole Junior College. See , 70 O.S. 4423 , supra. … However, we find no such exception with regard to the Board of Regents of Seminole Junior College.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1989)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 23, 1989

    ON FEBRUARY 3, 1989, PPOK WAS AWARDED A STATE CONTRACT BY THE STATE EMPLOYEES GROUP INSURANCE BOARD TO ACT AS A PREFERRED PROVIDER OF PHARMACEUTICAL SUPPLIES FOR PERSONS WHO ARE MEMBERS OF THE STATE BOARD'S PREFERRED PROVIDER … IN ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION NO. 79-202, IT WAS OPINED: "A MEMBER OF A WATER BOARD IS "INDIRECTLY INTERESTED" IN A CONTRACT LET BY THE BOARD WHEN A MEMBER HAS OR IS LIKELY TO HAVE A PECUNIARY OR PERSONAL INTEREST IN _ THE

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1979)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 7, 1979

    See Whitten v. Farm and Home Savings and Loan Association of Missouri, 85 P.2d 759 (Okla. 1938), Wickersham v. State Election Board, 357 P.2d 421 (Okla. 1960). … Article V , Section 21 of the Oklahoma Constitution creates the Board on Legislative Compensation and provides in part that "Members of the Legislature shall receive such compensation as shall be fixed by the Board on Legislative

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 79-007 (1979) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 7, 1979

    Board of Education, City of Ardmore v. State, Okla. 109 P. 563 (1910). In construing any statute, the pr;mary rule of construction is to ascertain and declare the intention of the Legislature. Midwest City v. … Adams v. Fry, Okl. 230 P.2d 915 , 1951 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 76-283 (1976) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 28, 1976

    Board of Trustees of Police Pension and Retirement System of the City of Tulsa v. Kern, Okl., 366 P.2d 415 (1961). … Board of Education of City of Okmulgee v. State Board of Education, Okl., 200 P.2d 394 (1949).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1980) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 4, 1980

    Further, all ordinary and necessary expenditures may only be paid upon due authorization of the Board. It is apparent from the language, Board authorization is a condition precedent to payment of cemetery expenses. … Parks v. Stith, 108 Okl. 84 , 232 P.2d 614 (1951).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1979)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 3, 1979

    In addition, the chairman and members of said Pardon and Parole Board shall receive their actual and necessary expenses while attending and going to and from meetings of the Board and in performing their official duties, … The Court in Reubin v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 77-274 (1978) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 28, 1978

    We recognize the case of City of Altus, Oklahoma v. Carr, 255 F. Supp. 828 (W.D. Tex. 1966), as dealing with a similar issue, but find it not dispositive of this question. … Inc. v. Cottrell (Miss. 1976), 96 S.Ct. 923 , 424 U.S. 366 , 47 L.Ed.2d 55 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Question Submitted by: Lyle R. Kelsey, Executive Director, Oklahoma Board of Medical Licensure & Supervision

    2024 OK AG 3 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 22, 2024

    Board of Pharmacy on the Physician Assistant Drug Formulary. 59 O.S.2021, § 519.6(E)(1). … 2000 OK AG 34, Question Submitted by: Lyle Kelsey, Executive Director, Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision Cited Oklahoma Supreme Court Cases Cite Name Level 1939 OK 467, 97 P.2d 58, 186 Okla. 217, CASE v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 76-104 (1976) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 10, 1976

    The State Board of Public Affairs is authorized to use brand names in taking competitive bids. … After recognizing that certain constitutional agencies may be exempt from the Act under the authority of Trapp v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 77-249 (1977) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 23, 1977

    See, Oldham v. Drummond Board of Education of Independent School District, Okl., 542 P.2d 1309 (1975). … See, Spurrier v. Mallouf, 184 Okl. 251 , 86 P.2d 995 (1939).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1968) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 27, 1968

    "On the interpretation of statutes we find that in McCain v. … "In Blanset v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1980) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 8, 1980

    governing said school district, and for all other purposes approved by the State Board of Education. … See Vette v. Childers, 102 Okl. 140 , 228 P. 145 (1924).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 76-154 (1976) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 28, 1976

    may be paid by a board of education at school district expense. … to carry out and fulfill all powers herein grant Syllabus 2 by the Court in City of Wilburton v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 78-256 (1978) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 28, 1978

    This provision of our Constitution was construed in the case of Board of Equalization of Tulsa County v. … As can be seen, no where in the statute is the State Board of Public Affairs given control over litigation. As was noted in State ex rel. Nesbitt v. Dist.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2003)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 31, 2003

    V. … Rather, as the Oklahoma Supreme Court held in Nesbitt v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.