Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersoklaag

2,251 results

0.82s

  • Opinion No. (1985)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 2, 1985

    See also, Magnolia Petroleum Company v. Jefferson County Excise Board , 90 P.2d 648 (Okla. 1939); Tulsa County Excise Board v. … See, City of Healdton v. Board of Education , 232 P.2d 148 (Okla. 1951) (bondholder may bring action, including mandamus, when school district refuses to levy annual taxes to pay for improvements); Board of Education v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1988)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 23, 1988

    The degree of authority granted to these various other boards of regents varies tremendously from board to board, even as among the constitutionally authorized boards, and no attempt is made here to examine such differences … Draper v. State Board of Equalization, 414 P.2d 276 (Okla. 1966). Legislative silence, when it has authority to speak, may be considered as giving rise to an implication of legislative intent. City of Duncan v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 70-246 (1970) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 14, 1970

    That is to say, Chase v. … Both Murray v. State, supra, and Chase v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 72-210 (1972) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 20, 1972

    A similar provision, though, was construed in Elder v. Anderson, 205 Cal.App.2d 326 , 23 Cal.Rptr. 48 (1962). … A determination of the propriety of issuing such information would then be a decision of the local school district Board of Education, such Board being the governing authority of the school district, see 70 O.S. 5 -106 [

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 26, 1980

    See State v. Guardian Funeral Home, Okl. 429 P.2d 732 (1967). … See First National Bank v. Oklahoma Savings and Loan Board, 569 P.2d 993 (1977).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1985)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 6, 1985

    Dear Honorable Moss, The Attorney General has received your request for an official opinion asking, in effect: Does a County Board of Equalization have the authority to request a taxpayer to submit information to the Board … Hughes Drilling Co. v. Morgan , 648 P.2d 32 (Okla. 1982); Cave Springs Public School District I-30 v. Blair , 613 P.2d 1046 (Okla. 1980).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1995)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 27, 1995

    Jackson v. Independent School District No. 16 of Payne County, 648 P.2d 26 , 29 (Okla. 1982). Because section 5-117.1 is plain and unambiguous, its evident meaning must be accepted. … Jackson v. Independent School District No. 16 of Payne County, 648 P.2d 26 (Okla. 1982).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 76-108 (1976) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 24, 1976

    SCHOOL BOARD MEMBER — WIFE SUBSTITUTE TEACHING A school board member's wife is legally eligible to do substitute teaching during the absence of other teachers and for short periods of time. … That opinion construed Section 2381 which is now codified as Section 481 and based its conclusion on the case of Reddell v. State, 14 Okl. Cr. 199 , 17 P. 273 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1985)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 1, 1985

    In other words, to determine the minimum salary of the assistant secretary of the county election board one must first determine the scheduled salary of a full-time secretary of the county election board as well as the highest … Jackson v. Independent School District No. 16 of Payne County , 648 P.2d 26 , 29 (Okla. 1982).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1994)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 2, 1994

    GRAND RIVER DAM AUTHORITY V. STATE, 645 P.2D 1011 (OKLA.1982). IN ADDITION, CONSTRUCTION THAT WOULD LEAD TO AN ABSURDITY MUST BE AVOIDED AND A RATIONALE CONSTRUCTION MUST BE EMPLOYED. LEDBETTER V. … TAYLOR V. SPECIAL INDEMNITY FUND, 804 P.2D 431, 432 (OKLA.1990).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 78-256 (1978) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 28, 1978

    This provision of our Constitution was construed in the case of Board of Equalization of Tulsa County v. … As can be seen, no where in the statute is the State Board of Public Affairs given control over litigation. As was noted in State ex rel. Nesbitt v. Dist.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1992)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 5, 1992

    IS THERE A PROHIBITION OR CONFLICT OF INTEREST FOR VERD ARK CA BOARD MEMBERS TO SERVE AS EODD BOARD MEMBERS OR OFFICERS? … CARTWRIGHT V. GEORGIA PACIFIC CORP., 663 P.2D 718 (OKLA.1982).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1980) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 14, 1980

    Both the Board of County Commissioners and governing bodies of cities have been determined to be public agencies within the statute. Hickman v. City of Tulsa, 490 P.2d 1405 (Okla. 1971). … See Adair County Excise Board, et al. v. Board of County Commissioners of Adair County, 438 P.2d 484 (Okla. 1968).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 78-114 (1978) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 31, 1978

    Hayes v. U.S., 112 F.2d 417 (1940); City of Duncan v. Bingham, Okl., 394 P.2d 456 (1964); State ex rel. Nesbitt v. Rambo, Okl., 448 P.2d 1012 (1969). … (Citing Aebli v. Board of Education, 145 P.2d 601 , 62 Cal.App.2d 706 (1944); and Rible v. Hughes, 160 P.2d 455 , 24 Cal.2d 437 , 154 A.L.R 137 (1944) See also, 68 Am.Jur.2d "Schools", 144.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1994)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 1, 1994

    YOUR QUESTION ASKS WHETHER A PERSON WHO IS EMPLOYED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MUNICIPAL PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY MAY SERVE ON THE BOARD OF THE GRDA AS AN "OFFICER OF A MUNICIPALITY." … SEE ALSO, OLIVER V. CITY OF TULSA, 654 P.2D 607 (OKLA.1982)."

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 68-358 (1968) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 3, 1968

    Do authorized agents of the State Board of Agriculture have the authority to make complaints in their official capacity as agents of the Board?" … U.S. v. Watasha, 102 F.2d 428 (10th Cir. 1939). However, the Board of Agriculture has been given express authority to appoint authorized agents to perform certain services for the Board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1994)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 26, 1994

    THE STATUTORY DUTY OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES TO MANAGE THE BUSINESS AND AFFAIRS OF THE COOPERATIVE IS MORE LIKE THE FUNCTIONS OF THE BOARD OF A PRIVATE CORPORATION. … A CASE SIMILAR TO THE SITUATION POSED IS SCHOENBAUM V. ORANGE COUNTY CENTER FOR PERFORMING ARTS.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 70-266 (1970) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 21, 1970

    But those sections have no application to a community junior college, which is administered by a board of trustees rather than a Board of Regents. … Boydston v. State, Okl., 277 P.2d 138 (1954). It is therefore the opinion of the Attorney General that your question be answered in the negative.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 73-114 (1973) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 19, 1973

    In Guthrie Daily Leader v. … In Gibson v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2007)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 20, 2007

    Riffe Petroleum Co. v. Great Nat. Corp., Inc. , 614 P.2d 576 , 579 (Okla. 1980). As the Supreme Court of New Mexico observed in State, ex rel . Gonzales v. … Campbell v. Campbell , 450 P.2d 203 , 205 (Okla. 1966).

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.