Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,251 results
0.59s
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 9, 1949
** LUMP SUM APPROPRIATIONS — STATE BOARD OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS — CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ** HE CONFERENCE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS HAS VOTED TO APPROPRIATE A LUMP SUM TO THE STATE BOARD OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS TO BE USED BY SAID BOARD … — AFFIRMATIVE (GOVERNOR'S CONTINGENCY FUND) CITE: ARTICLE V, SECTION 55 (FRED HANSEN)
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 17, 1980
In Opinion 78-206 a rural water district was deemed to be a public agency, but the positions on the board were not interpreted as constituting a public office. State v. … To be a public officer the criteria set forth in Oklahoma City v. Century Indemnity Company, 178 Okl. 212 , 62 P.2d 94 (1936) must be met.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 10, 1988
Second, as a member of the Board, he acts as an active participant in the full range of substantive and policy making functions of the Board. … Lekan v. P L Fire Protection District, 609 P.2d 1289 (Okla. 1980); State ex rel. Dawson v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 17, 1970
In the case of Alexander et al v. Richie, et al, 132 W. … Undoubtedly the sale of supplies to the Board by the Corporation and payment therefor constituted a contract. Hunt v. Allen, supra.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 7, 1979
See Whitten v. Farm and Home Savings and Loan Association of Missouri, 85 P.2d 759 (Okla. 1938), Wickersham v. State Election Board, 357 P.2d 421 (Okla. 1960). … Article V , Section 21 of the Oklahoma Constitution creates the Board on Legislative Compensation and provides in part that "Members of the Legislature shall receive such compensation as shall be fixed by the Board on Legislative
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 19, 1969
Dry Cleaners Board — Consultant The State Dry Cleaners' Board may hire a person with a strong technical and professional background in the dry cleaning industry who will be able to provide those persons engaged in the cleaning … Special Indemnity Fund v. Prewitt, 201 Okl. 308 , 205 P.2d 306 (1949); Boydston v. State, Okl., 277 P.2d 138 (1954).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 20, 1977
Hart v. … See United States v. State Tax Commission of Mississippi, et al., 421 U.S. 599 , 44 L.Ed.2d 404 , 95 S.Ct. 1872 (1975); United States v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 12, 1976
Following the rule regarding statutory construction and legislative intent set out in Stemmons, Inc. v. Universal C.I.T. … The principle of this rule of statutory construction is followed in Oliver v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, 359 P.2d 183 (1960).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 6, 1990
OR AFFINITY TO THE PRESIDENT OF AN INSTITUTION GOVERNED BY THAT BOARD? … SEE REDDELL V. STATE. SUPRA.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 6, 1968
The Board may then adopt the proposed regulations or refer them both to the Commission for further consideration." … Symonds v. Bucklin, Maryland, 197 F. Supp. 682 . Windsor v. Whitby, 95 Conn. 357 , 111 A. 354 ., 12 A.L.R. 669 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 9, 1999
See, e.g., City of Birmingham v. Hawkins, 94 So. 62 , 65 (Ala. 1922); Nichols v. Galveston County, 228 S.W. 547 , 548 (Tex. 1921); and Chemical Bank Trust Co. v. Oakland County, 251 N.W. 395 , 400 (Mich. 1933). … See Oklahoma State Election Board v. Coats, 610 P.2d 776 , 778-79 (Okla. 1980).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 13, 1973
In Pierce v. … The Supreme Court of Kansas considered a similar question in Crevhon, et al. v. Board of Education of City of Parsons, 163 P. 145 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 15, 1978
No Board, commission, department, program or office whose expenditure of funds for salaries and wages has been limited by legislative action shall exceed the amount unless approval is first granted by the Board." … However, to read the above subsection as authority for powers not specifically enumerated in Section 3603 would be contrary to a basic rule of statutory construction found in American First Title and Trust Company v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 31, 1998
ISD-89 v. … ISD-89 v. OCFT at 723.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 8, 1971
In this regard, see State v. Currier, 347 P.2d 29 (Arizona); State v. Morris, 103 A.2d 913 (New Hampshire). Title 22 C.J.S. … Criminal Law, 305, states the following general proposition of law which is quoted from City of Alarnogordo v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 13, 1975
In Article V , Section 36 of the Oklahoma Constitution, legislative authority is set forth as follows: "The authority of the legislature shall extend to all rightful subjects of legislation, and any specific grant of authority … Cr., 87 P.2d 1106 (1939); Coburn v. Schroeder, Okl. Cr., 112 P.2d 191 (1941) and Ex parte Barrett, Okl. Cr., 132 P.2d 657 (1942). Also pertinent to this question is the holding in Petition of Leaser, Okl.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 12, 1977
Bogert, The Law of Trusts, Section 92, page 331 (5th Ed. 1973); Morville v. Fowle, 144 Mass. 109 , 10 N.E. 766 ; In Re Johnson, D.C. Okl., 518 F.2d 246 (1975) . … Williamson v. Evans, Okl. Cr., 319 P.2d 1112 (1957).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 27, 1978
After the challenge period expires, and the petition is validated by the local board as having the sufficient percentage of names, the local board shall call for a secret ballot election." … First National Bank Trust Co. of Chickasha v. U.S., 462 F.2d 908 (1972).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 28, 1978
McVicker v. Board of County Commissioners of Caddo County, 442 P.2d 297 (1968). … See Hampton v. Ewert, 22 F.2d 81 , cert. den. 48 S.Ct. 303 , 276 U.S. 623 (1972), and more recently in Boydston v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 30, 1975
Where the statute fixes a minimum salary, a board has no power to employ for less than the statutory wage." In State, ex rel. Darnell v. … The applicable rule of statutory construction is stated in Shriver v. Graham, Okl.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna