Case law

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 15, 1955

OPINION — AG — SAID CLAUSE NO. 13 DOES NOT AUTHORIZE YOUR BOARD (OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD) TO GRANT SAID BOAT CONCESSION TO MR. … , IN WHICH EVENT YOUR BOARD WOULD HAVE SUCH AUTHORITY AND SAID LEASE AGREEMENT WOULD NOT BE VIOLATED.

Opinion No. 51-0828

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 28, 1951

OPINION — AG — ** CENTRAL PURCHASING — BIDS ** IS THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD REQUIRED BY LAW TO PURCHASE NECESSARY SUPPLIES, MATERIALS, ETC., INCLUDING PRINTING, THROUGH THE STATE BOARD OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS ?

Opinion No. 52-0920

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 20, 1952

OPINION — AG — ** BUILDING — BONDS ** THUS, IF THE USE TO WHICH THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD PROPOSES TO PUT SAID FRAME BUILDING BRINGS IT WITHIN THE CLASSIFICATION OF FACILITIES "WHICH CANNOT BE CONSTRUCTED … THE BOARD WOULD HAVE NO AUTHORITY TO BUY SAID BUILDING UNLESS THE OWNER THEREOF FURNISHED CLEAR TITLE THERETO. (PURCHASE) CITE: 74 O.S. 351 [ 74-351 ] (MAINARD KENNERLY)

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 21, 1955

INCURRED AGAINST ANY ITEM OF APPROPRIATION PROVIDED FOR IN SENATE BILL NO. 369 OF THE 24TH OKLAHOMA LEG AT ANY TIME PRIOR TO DECEMBER 20, 1955, PROVIDED THAT PAYMENT THEREOF BE MADE IN HARMONY WITH THAT PORTION OF ARTICLE V

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 28, 1953

OPINION — AG — QUESTION: CAN THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOUCES BOARD BE AUTHORIZED TO EXPEND PUBLIC FUNDS FOR THE BEAUTIFICATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE CEMETERY OWNED AND OPERATED BY THE OLD BOGGY DEPOT CEMETERY ASSOCIATION

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 6, 1951

OPINION — AG — ** SALESMAN — EMPLOYMENT — PUBLIC FUNDS ** THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD HAS AUTHORITY TO EMPLOY SALESMEN TO SELL " TRAVEL POSTER STAMPS " IN THE MANNER AND UPON THE TERMS STATED.

Opinion No. 55-1118

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 18, 1955

OPINION — AG — THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD CAN LEGALLY PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A BUILDING IN A STATE PARK, TO BE OWNED BY THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, FOR USE AS A CHAPEL BY THE GENERAL PUBLIC WITHOUT REGARD THE

Opinion No. 55-0520

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 20, 1955

OPINION — AG — 74 O.S.H. 351(L), THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD WOULD BE WITHOUT AUTHORITY TO GRANT TO THE CONCESSIONAIRE OPERATING ONE OF THE STATE PARKS UNDER CONTROL OF SAID BOARD A LEASE PORTION OF THE LAND

Opinion No. 70-197 (1970) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 1, 1970

May a school board authorize a monthly flat rate expense allowance for board employees? "3. … There is no specific authorization for a school board to authorize a monthly flat rate expense allowance for board employees. In the case of Brown v.

Opinion No. 71-338 (1971) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 9, 1971

Brown v. State Election Board, Okl., 369 P.2d 140 . It is, therefore, the opinion of the Attorney General that your question be answered in the affirmative.

Opinion No. 55-0705

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 5, 1955

OPINION — AG — THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD MAY PROPERLY APPROVE DIFFERENCES IN RATES WHERE THERE IS A DIFFERENCE IN THE FACILITIES OR THE TIME FOR WHICH THE FACILITIES ARE USED. . . . … THAT IS, WE THINK YOUR BOARD MAY PROPERLY APPROVE A LOWER RATE FOR USERS OF ROOMS FOR A "LONG TERM" OR "SEASONAL" USER THAN FOR A USER WHO OCCUPIES THE ROOM FOR A SHORTER PERIOD OF TIME.

Opinion No. 55-0520

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 20, 1955

OPINION — AG — THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD WOULD BE WITHOUT AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THE PROPOSED SUBROGATION RECEIPT HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED, IT ITS PRESENT FORM, BUT WOULD BE AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE AN INSTRUMENT

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 14, 1955

OPINION — AG — THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD, ACTING ON BEHALF OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CAN LEGALLY AGREE TO THE PROPOSED MODIFICATION, UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE LEASE AGREEMENT AUTHORIZING A MODIFICATION OF … THE RESPONSIBILITY OF DETERMINING THE ADEQUACY OF THE CONSIDERATION IS ON THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD. CITE: 74 O.S.H. 344.19, 74 O.S.H. 356.2, ARTICLE V, SECTION 53, 74 O.S.H. 356.8 (J. H. JOHNSON)

Opinion No. 55-0528

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 28, 1955

OPINION — AG — SUCH PROCEDURE IS PROPER AND WOULD BE PROPER IN CONNECTION WITH SUCH PURCHASES (OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD), FROM THE PROCEEDS OF STATE IMPROVEMENT BONDS ISSUED UNDER AUTHORITY OF 74 O.S.H. 356.1

Opinion No. 53-1113

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 13, 1953

Opinion No. 52-0425

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 25, 1952

OPINION — AG — ** OKLAHOMA GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY — EASEMENT — BOARD OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS ** IT IS OUR UNDERSTANDING THAT THE BOARD OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS HAS ADOPTED A POLICY OF REQUIRING THE APPROVAL BY THE HEAD OF THE STATE … IN THIS CONNECTION, WE SEE NO OBJECTION TO THE APPROVAL OF THE PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD BEING ENDORSED ON THE EASEMENT, IF THE UTILITY COMPANY REQUESTS THE BOARD OF AFFAIRS TO EXECUTE AN EASEMENT ON THE PARK LANDS MENTIONED

Opinion No. (1985)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 24, 1985

Dear Honorable Brown, The Attorney General has received your request for an official opinion asking, in effect: 1. … Hughes Drilling Co. v. Morgan , 648 P.2d 32 (Okla. 1982); Jackson v. Independent School District No. 16 of Payne County , 648 P.2d 26 (Okla. 1982).

Opinion No. (1996)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 1, 1996

E.g., Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593 (1972); and Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 (1972). ¶ 12 As the United States Supreme Court held in Board of Regents v. … Id. ¶ 23 Relying on a decision of the Alabama Supreme Court, Brown's Ferry Waste Disposal Center v.

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 4, 1957

OPINION — AG — ** TOURIST — EXPENSES — FACILITIES ** (1) A CONTRACT SUCH AS THAT DESCRIBED IN THE FIRST PARAGRAPH OF THIS LETTER IS WITHIN THE LEGAL AUTHORITY OF THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD; AND THAT SUCH A … CONTRACT WOULD BE PROPERLY CHARGEABLE AGAINST AN UNENCUMBERED BALANCE OF FUNDS ALLOCATED TO THE APPROPRIATION HEREINABOVE MENTIONED, OR AGAINST FUNDS CONTRIBUTED TO THE BOARD FOR THE PURPOSE OF ADVERTISING AND PUBLICIZING

Opinion No. 52-1023

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 23, 1952