Case law

Opinion No. (1994)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 1, 1994

YOUR QUESTION ASKS WHETHER A PERSON WHO IS EMPLOYED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MUNICIPAL PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY MAY SERVE ON THE BOARD OF THE GRDA AS AN "OFFICER OF A MUNICIPALITY." … SEE ALSO, OLIVER V. CITY OF TULSA, 654 P.2D 607 (OKLA.1982)."

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 11, 1971

OPINION — AG — **** BOARD OF LEGISLATION COMPENSATION — WITHOUT LEGISLATIVE POWERS **** (1) THE BOARD OF LEGISLATIVE COMPENSATION CANNOT REQUIRE MEMBERS OF THE LEGISLATURE TO PASS SPECIFIC LEGISLATION AS A CONDITION FOR RECEIVING … CITE: ARTICLE V, SECTION 21/ARTICLE IV, SECTION 1 (LARRY DERRYBERRY)

Opinion No. (1991)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 7, 1991

City of Tulsa v. Midland Valley R. Co., 168 F.2d 252 , 254 (10th Cir. 1948), citing City of Tulsa v. … Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. Stephens County, Excise Board, 312 P.2d 883 (Okla. 1957).

Opinion No. (2007)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 20, 2007

Riffe Petroleum Co. v. Great Nat. Corp., Inc. , 614 P.2d 576 , 579 (Okla. 1980). As the Supreme Court of New Mexico observed in State, ex rel . Gonzales v. … Campbell v. Campbell , 450 P.2d 203 , 205 (Okla. 1966).

Opinion No. (1999)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 20, 1999

You have asked whether the State Board of Education is obligated to recover an overpayment of state aid when discovered. In Miller v. … In Board of County Commissioners v.

Opinion No. 76-365 (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 28, 1976

It appears from the foregoing authorities that such matters as raised in your opinion request rest in the discretion of the Board of County Commissioners as authorized by the authority vested in the Board by statute. … In the Supreme Court case of City of McAlester, et al. v. State ex rel.

Opinion No. (1994)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 26, 1994

THE STATUTORY DUTY OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES TO MANAGE THE BUSINESS AND AFFAIRS OF THE COOPERATIVE IS MORE LIKE THE FUNCTIONS OF THE BOARD OF A PRIVATE CORPORATION. … A CASE SIMILAR TO THE SITUATION POSED IS SCHOENBAUM V. ORANGE COUNTY CENTER FOR PERFORMING ARTS.

Opinion No. (1997)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 11, 1997

Hughes Drilling Company v. Morgan, 648 P.2d 32 , 35 (Okla. 1982). … Independent School District No. 8 of Seiling v. Swanson, 553 P.2d 496 , 501 (Okla. 1976) (quoting Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. Cloudman, citation omitted).

Opinion No. 80-191 (1981) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 14, 1981

Hedges et al. v. Groom, 194 Okl. 384 , 151 P.2d 936 (1944). … Stemmons Inc. v. Universal C.I.T. Credit Corp., Okl., 301 P.2d 212 (1956).

Opinion No. (1979)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 9, 1979

Dear President Duncan, The Attorney General has received your request for an opinion wherein you ask, in effect, the following question: May the State Board of Barber Examiners waive any of the requirements found in 59 O.S … McVicker v. Board of County Commissioners of Caddo County, 442 P.2d 297 (Okla. 1968). It is, therefore, the opinion of the Attorney General that your question be answered in the negative.

Opinion No. (1994)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 2, 1994

GRAND RIVER DAM AUTHORITY V. STATE, 645 P.2D 1011 (OKLA.1982). IN ADDITION, CONSTRUCTION THAT WOULD LEAD TO AN ABSURDITY MUST BE AVOIDED AND A RATIONALE CONSTRUCTION MUST BE EMPLOYED. LEDBETTER V. … TAYLOR V.

Opinion No. 69-183 (1969) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 5, 1969

We have checked other provisions of law and find no authority for the county or its governing board, the Board of County Commissioners, to expend county funds for the purpose of building a retention dam for a non-profit water … In the case of Allen V.

Opinion No. (1979)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 21, 1979

A member of a board of education of an independent school district has long been regarded as a public office or a position of public trust. Gibson v. Crowder, 196 Okla. 406 , 165 P.2d 628 (1946); see also Op. Att'y. … Edmondson v. State ex rel. Phelps, 533 P.2d 604 , 616 , (Okla. 1975). Under the language of Gibson v.

Opinion No. 75-132 (1975) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 8, 1975

The Board shall consider a report of the circumstances of the case to be presented by a hearing examiner appointed by the Board. … City of Tulsa v. Goins, Okl., 437 P.2d 257 259 (1967). Therefore, the hearing examiner's report is by law one basis of the Board's final decision in a case, and is a proper part of the record.

Opinion No. (1992)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 30, 1992

V. OKLA. CO., 618 P.2D 915, 919 (OKLA.1980). … SEE, 59 O.S. 15 .5 (1991) (PUBLIC ACCOUNTANCY BOARD), 59 O.S. 328 .4 (BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF REGISTERED DENTISTS) AND 74 O.S. 908 (OPERS/STATE EDUCATION EMPLOYEES GROUP INSURANCE BOARD). (VICTOR N. BIRD)

Opinion No. 76-145 (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 25, 1976

In Borin v. … In Sooner State Water, Inc. v.

Opinion No. 78-108 (1978) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 13, 1978

Pursuant to the statutory authority granted the Board of Regents of Oklahoma Colleges under the provisions of 70 O.S. 3206 [ 70-3206 ] and 70 O.S. 3510 [ 70-3510 ] (1971), the Board of Regents have adopted its policy manual … Refer generally, 47 O.S. 1 -101 [ 47-1-101 ] (1971), Parker v. State, Okl. Cr., 424 P.2d 997 (1967), U.S. v. Ray, 488 F.2d 15 (1973).

Opinion No. (1979) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 4, 1979

The construction of the nepotism statutes and the intent of the legislature, were dealt with in Reddell v. State, 14 Okl. Cr., 199 , 170 P. 273 (1918), wherein the Court said: ". . . … The Court went on to say that the nepotism statutes did not prevent a school board member from issuing a warrant to a part-time employee where such person was related to the member of the board.

Opinion No. (1979)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 4, 1979

The construction of the nepotism statutes and the intent of the Legislature, were dealt with in Reddell v. State, 14 Okla. Cr. 199 , 170 P.273 (1918), wherein the Court said: ". . . … The Court went on to say that the nepotism statutes did not prevent a school board member from issuing a warrant to a part-time employee where such person was related to the member of the board.

Opinion No. 80-082 (1980) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 14, 1980

When any such election is held, the decision of the school district electorate is binding upon the school board. … Boydston v. State, Okl., 277 P.2d 138 (1954).