Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,251 results
1.10s
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 13, 1968
In the case of Weir v. Bauer, Utah, 286 P. 936 , the Court had occasion to construe the term "or". … Caldwell v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 7, 2003
See Hall v. Globe Life Accident Ins. … . ¶ 7 Another rule of statutory construction applicable to your question is enunciated in Ramsey v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 12, 1982
OPINION — AG — ** STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION — PROTEST — HEARING ** (1) UNDER 68 O.S. 2465 [ 68-2465 ], AN INDIVIDUAL TAXPAYER WHO FILES A WRITTEN PROTEST WITH THE STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, FEELING HIMSELF AGGRIEVED BY … BY VIRTUE OF THE DECISION OF THE OKLAHOMA SUPREME COURT ' STATE EX REL POULOS V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 10, 1980
Crane v. State, 5 Okl.Cr. 560 , 115 P. 622 (1911). … See Stine v. Lewis, 33 Okla. 609 , 127 P. 396 (1912).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 12, 1980
See AMF Tubescope Co. v. Hatchel, 547 P.2d 374 (Okl. 1976). However, in Oklahoma Association of Municipal Attorneys v. … See Felber v. Foote, 321 F. Supp. 85 (Dist. Conn. 1970).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 7, 1977
From a plain reading of these statutes, there is no doubt that a public contract in which a member of the governing board has an interest is void. In the Oklahoma case of Youngblood v. … The California case of Miller v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 10, 1988
Second, as a member of the Board, he acts as an active participant in the full range of substantive and policy making functions of the Board. … Lekan v. P L Fire Protection District, 609 P.2d 1289 (Okla. 1980); State ex rel. Dawson v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 29, 1990
PHELDS V. STATE, 598 P.2D 254 (OKL CR. 1979). … WILSON V. SHOCKER, 819 F.2D 943 (OKL. 1987).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 5, 1976
Board, but only after the Board, by a majority vote thereof, shall have authorized and directed such performance by said Chairman." … This interpretation is consistent with the general rule that statutory grants of authority to Boards of County Commissioners are strictly construed. See Allen, et al. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 25, 1968
that had such officers been in a meeting of the Board they would have voted to ask for the opinion as a Board. … In the case of Draper v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 6, 1990
OR AFFINITY TO THE PRESIDENT OF AN INSTITUTION GOVERNED BY THAT BOARD? … SEE REDDELL V. STATE. SUPRA.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 28, 1974
to the effect that the Federal Revenue Sharing Fund created by Senate Bill No. 73 is a "special fund" as referred to in Oklahoma Constitution, Article X , Section 23 , is supported by the decision in the case of Draper v. … Draper v. State Board of Equalization, supra. However, while in session, the Second Session of the Thirty-fourth Legislature may properly appropriate the cash on hand in the Federal Revenue Sharing Fund. (Odie A.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 7, 1970
STATE BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS — EXPENSES — EMPLOYEES The State Board of Medical Examiners is not limited in the expenses it may pay an employee by the provisions of 74 O.S. 500 .1 [ 74-500.1 ] through 74 O.S. 500 .11 [ … In the case of Citizens' State Bank of Vici v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 30, 1970
See Reubin v. … Co. v. Board of Education, 83 Okl. 12 , 200 P. 171 (1921). Indeed, we relied on the Atlas Life case significantly in our earlier opinions.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 24, 1992
LOCAL 2479 V. THORPE, 632 P.2D 408, 412, (OKLA.1981). … ROGERS V. EXCISE BOARD OF GREER COUNTY, 701 P.2D 754 (OKLA. 1984).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 21, 1980
Wallace v. … Indeed, Section 34 provides that the State Board shall maintain separate accounts not only for each municipality, but also for "each firefighter". Moran v. State ex rel.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 28, 1978
McVicker v. Board of County Commissioners of Caddo County, 442 P.2d 297 (1968). … See Hampton v. Ewert, 22 F.2d 81 , cert. den. 48 S.Ct. 303 , 276 U.S. 623 (1972), and more recently in Boydston v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 11, 1989
Hughes Drilling Co. v. … Although the Board is not authorized to budget monies generally appropriated to the DAC, the Board does have the right and duty to communicate its recommendations regarding the Board's administrative needs to the DAC.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 31, 1974
EXECUTIVE SESSION — SCHOOL BOARD The provisions of 25 O.S. 201 [ 25-201 ] (1971) prohibit a board of education from discussing student disciplinary matters or conducting student disciplinary hearings in executive session. … Our research reveals no decisions requiring school board meetings considering student disciplinary matters to be conducted in executive session. The recent case of Canney v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 29, 1976
Groves v. … (p. 1042) A board of education being a public office (Barnhill v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna