Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,251 results
1.34s
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 21, 1968
the proper election board. … Hampton v. Oakes, Okl., 281 P.2d 749 (1955).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 9, 1979
Senate Bill No. 33, provides for the recreation of eight state boards These boards were due to terminate under the Sunset Laws on July 1, 1979. … Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County v. Oklahoma Tax Commission et al., (City of Tulsa et al.) Interveners 212 P.2d 462 (1949) .
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 17, 1968
Excise Board of Washita County v. Lowden, 189 Okl. 286 , 116 P.2d 700 , 702." … In the case of Board of Commissioners of Tulsa County v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 21, 1991
NO. 80-221; BURKHARDT V. CITY OF ENID, 771 P.2D 608, 611 (OKLA. 1989); VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS V. CHILDERS, 171 P.2D 618 (OKLA. 1946); HAWKS V. BLAND, 9 P.2D 720 (OKLA. 1932); YETTE V. … WAY V. GRAND LAKE ASSOCIATION. INC., 635 P.2D 1010, 1015-1018 (OKLA. 1981).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 13, 1972
See also Haslett v. Board of Commissioners of Muskogee County, 168 Okl. 290 , 32 P.2d 940 (1934) and Board of County Commissioners of Harmon County v. King, 194 Okl. 593 , 153 P.2d 483 (1944). … See also Haslett v. Board of Commissioners of Muskogee County, 168 Okl. 290 , 32 P.2d 940 (1934) and Board of County Commissioners of Harmon County v. King, 194 Okl. 593 , 153 P.2d 483 (1944).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 13, 2000
Naylor v. Petuskey, 834 P.2d 439 , 440 (Okla. 1992) (citing Humphrey v. Denney, 757 P.2d 833 (Okla. 1988)). … Legislative intent is ascertained by scrutinizing the Board's licensure law in its entirety rather than by its individual provisions. See McNeill v. City of Tulsa, 953 P.2d 329 , 332 (Okla. 1998).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 28, 1978
Co. v. Beatty, 34 Okl. 321 , 118 P. 367 (1911) . … with the Twenty-Five Dollars per day, would be consistent with the language of Article V , Section 21 of the Oklahoma Constitution which provides that Board shall serve without compensation but shall be entitled to receive
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 8, 2001
Oglesby v. Lib. Mut. Ins. Co., 832 P.2d 834 , 844 (Okla. 1992). … McNeill v. City of Tulsa, 953 P.2d 329 , 332 (Okla. 1998) (citing Simpson v. Okla. Alcoholic Bev. Control Bd., 409 P.2d 364 , 367 (Okla. 1965)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 29, 1977
In Swatek Construction Co. v. Williams, 177 Okl. 305 , 58 P.2d 585 , 587 , the Oklahoma Supreme Court quoting from Good v. … of equalization but would become effective only with future appointments to such boards.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 31, 1998
Hill v. Board of Education, 944 P.2d 930 , 933 (Okla. 1997). … Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. Cloudman, 92 P.2d 837 , 841 (Okla. 1939).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 21, 1974
In the case of Baker v. … In Rheam v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 29, 1972
Stemmons, Inc. v. Universal C.I.T. Credit Corp., Okl., 301 P.2d 212 (1956). … Atlantic Refining Company v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, Okl., 360 P.2d 826 (1961). Nothing in Section 509.6 of Title 70 authorizes the local board of education to disregard the open meeting statute.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 26, 1996
Tweedy v. Oklahoma Bar Association, 624 P.2d 1049 , 1054 n. 12 (Okla. 1981) (citations omitted). … The school district through its board of education is the client.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 15, 2007
We begin by noting that the State Board of Corrections ("Board") is not a constitutionally created board, but a creation of statute. … The Legislature is restricted from limiting the powers of constitutional boards . Bd. of Regents v. Baker , 638 P.2d 464 , 466 (Okla. 1981).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 27, 1989
Bass v. Board of Commissioners of Lincoln County, 222 P. 995 (Okla. 1924). ¶ 5 The Oklahoma Supreme Court, in Edwards v. … (Emphasis added). ¶ 7 In Hicks, Carter County Superintendent v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 23, 1975
' awarded by the board of education? … The applicable rule is stated in the second paragraph of the syllabus by the court in City of Tulsa v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 28, 1976
In Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. … Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Welch, 446 P.2d 268 , 270 (Okl. 1968); Wray v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, 442 P.2d 309 , 311 (Okl. 1968); see also W.S. Dickey Clay Manufacturing Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 13, 1990
NEWLY ELECTED DIRECTORS AND THOSE APPOINTED BY THE GOVERNOR TO THE BOARD SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE ORGANIZATIONAL AND REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD FOLLOWING THE ANNUAL MEETING AS HEREIN SET FORTH." … BURFORD V. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF LINCOLN COUNTY, 162 P. 780 , 782 (OKLA. 1917).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 12, 1971
See Special Indemnity Fund v. Harold, Okla., 398 P.2d 827 . … In Rhine v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 24, 1975
board will suffice to carry out the directions of the act. … See Gammill v. Shackelford, 480 P.2d 920 (1970), and Tulsa Exposition and Fair Corp. v. Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County, 468 P.2d 501 (1970).
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna