Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersoklaag

2,251 results

0.66s

  • Opinion No. 78-132 (1978) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 20, 1978

    This Board is thus supported by, and entrusted with the expenditure of, public funds and is therefore a public board within the purview of 25 O.S. 304 -1 [25-304-1] (1977). … It remains only to be said that where a statute is plain and unambiguous on its face, it must be given effect according to its plain and obvious meaning, General Motors Corporation v. Cook, 528 P.2d 1110 (Okl. 1974).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 74-230 (1974) Ag Part II of Part II

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 2, 1974

    In State v. … In Rheam v. Board of Regents, Okl., 18 P.2d 535 , quoted in the case of Baker v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1996)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 13, 1996

    the Review Board to obtain OSBI records. … TXO Production Corporation v. Oklahoma Corporation Commission, 829 P.2d 964 , 968-9 (Okla. 1992). The Legislature expressed its intent in 10 O.S.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 79-197 (1979) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 9, 1979

    Senate Bill No. 33, provides for the recreation of eight state boards These boards were due to terminate under the Sunset Laws on July 1, 1979. … Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County v. Oklahoma Tax Commission et al., (City of Tulsa et al.) Interveners 212 P.2d 462 (1949) .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 70-145 (1970) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 23, 1970

    Dowell v. Board of Education of Oklahoma City, 185 Okl. 342 , 91 P.2d 771 (1939); McGowen, et al v. … Board of Education of Union Graded School District No. 25, et al, 188 Okl. 625 , 112 P.2d 355 (1941); Independent Consol. School Dist. No. 7 of Harrah, et al v. Bowen, 199 Okl. 92 , 183 P.2d 251 , 254 (1947).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2002)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 13, 2002

    The Board shall establish an examination to be used by the Board to determine the proficiency [sic] any a chiropractic physician who seeks certification from the Board. … Grand River Dam Auth. v. State, 645 P.2d 1011 , 1016 (Okla. 1982).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1994)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 16, 1994

    For example, see O'Brien v. … In Williams Petroleum Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 73-106 (1973) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 30, 1973

    Your question centers upon the existing authority of the Board pursuant to 82 O.S. 864 [ 82-864 ] (1971) to separate the job classification into a secretary and a treasurer. We refer you to Johnson v. … (Cites omitted) " In Dunlap v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 68-276 (1968) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 25, 1968

    In the case of People v. … And, in the case of the City of Dayton v. Horstman, Ohio Com.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 76-191 (1976) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 20, 1976

    In Delaware County Excise Board v. St. Louis v. San Francisco Railroad Company, 49 P.2d 523 , the Supreme Court discussed the levy of the gasoline tax and its purpose: ". . . … Board of County Commissioners of Harmon County v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1991)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 23, 1991

    This conclusion is buttressed by the Oklahoma Supreme Court decision in Draper v. State Board of Equalization, 414 P.2d 276 (Okla. 1966). … Smith v. Board of Equalization, 630 P.2d 1264 (Okla. 1981).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 68-313 (1968) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 11, 1968

    Brickell v. State Election Board, 203 Okl. 362 , 221 P.2d 785 (1950), Carlile v. Nat. Oil and Development Company, 83 Okl. 217 , 201 P. 377 (1921). … Federal Land Bank of Wichita, Kansas v. Howell, 123 F.2d 50 (10th Cir. 1941).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1992)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 22, 1992

    IN DETERMINING WHETHER THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY HAS A DUTY TO PROVIDE LEGAL ADVICE TO MEMBERS OF COUNTY FAIR BOARDS, WE MUST DETERMINE WHETHER BOARD MEMBERS ARE COUNTY OFFICERS. … THE ANALYSIS IN THAT OPINION WHICH SUPPORTED THE CONCLUSION THAT THE POSITION OF DIRECTOR OF A COUNTY FREE FAIR ASSOCIATION WAS A PUBLIC OFFICE CONSIDERED THE CRITERIA ESTABLISHED IN THE CASE OF GUTHRIE DAILY LEADER V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 80-063 (1980) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 9, 1980

    In Excise Board of Stephens County v. Chicago, R.I. P. Ry. … Board of Commissioners of Logan County v. State ex rel.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 4, 1951

    OCTOBER 29, 1949 — SONGER WHICH CONCLUDED: " IT IS OPINION THAT MEMBERSHIP ON A BOARD OF EDUCATION (SCHOOL BOARD) OF A SCHOOL DISTRICT IS AN " OFFICE UNDER THE LAWS OF THIS STATE "; THAT MEMBERSHIP ON THE COUNTY EXCISE BOARD … DISTRICT AND THE OFFICE OF MEMBER OF THE COUNTY EXCISE BOARD AND BOARD OF EQUALIZATION AT THE SAME TIME; AND THAT, UNDER THE RULE ANNOUNCED AND APPLIED IN THE CASE OF " GIBSON V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 92-599 (1992)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 14, 1992

    LAIRMORE V. BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS, 195 P.2D 762 (OKLA.1948). … CARTWRIGHT V. OKL. NATURAL GAS, 640 P.2D 1341 (OKLA.1982).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1985)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 9, 1985

    State v. … See, e.g., Grant and McNamee v. Payne , 107 P.2d 307 (Nev. 1940); School District No. 1 v. Gleason , 168 P.2d 347 (Ore. 1946); Stone v. Reynolds , 54 P. 555 (Okla. 1898).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1977) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 31, 1977

    ELECTIONS A secretary of a county election board is a county rather than a state officer. … Blankenship v. Atoka County, Okl., 456 P.2d 537 (1969), the Oklahoma Supreme Court viewed the assistant district attorney as a state officer for payroll purposes only and a county officer for all other purposes.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1991) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 5, 1991

    JONES V. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORP., 748 F.2D 1400 (10TH CIR. 1984). … THEREFORE, THE BOARD MAY DETERMINE WHETHER A PARTICULAR CORRESPONDENCE OR VIDEO OR TELEVISION COURSE MEETS THE CLASSROOM HOUR DEFINITION PROMULGATED BY THE BOARD. (SHERIDAN A. MCCAFFREE)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1996)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 23, 1996

    Thompson v. Ekberg, 613 P.2d 466 , 467 (Okla. 1980) (emphasis added), "and not so that [part of] a statute is rendered superfluous," Anderson v. … O'Donoghue, 677 P.2d 648 , 651 (Okla. 1983), or useless, Board of Education of Oklahoma City v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.