Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,251 results
1.33s
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 10, 1984
MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF CITY OF CLINTON — 53 A.2D 790 ', ' FLETCHER V. FEENEY — 400 A.2D 1084 ', ' LEONE V. BREWER — 184 N.E. 111 ', ' MICHAELS V. … TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE OF PEMBERTON TOWNSHIP — 67 A.2D 324 ', ' STATE EX REL KRAMER V. SCHWARTZ — 82 S.W.2d 63 ', ' NUCHOLLS V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 15, 1995
TXO Production Corp. v. Oklahoma Corporation Commission, 829 P.2d 964 (Okla. 1992). … TWA v. McKinley, 749 P.2d 108 (Okla. 1988). ¶ 4 The Oklahoma Legislature has specifically provided that no person may serve more than two full terms as a board member. 65 O.S.Supp. 1994, § 4-103[ 65-4-103 ] (b).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 13, 1996
the Review Board to obtain OSBI records. … TXO Production Corporation v. Oklahoma Corporation Commission, 829 P.2d 964 , 968-9 (Okla. 1992). The Legislature expressed its intent in 10 O.S.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 9, 1979
Senate Bill No. 33, provides for the recreation of eight state boards These boards were due to terminate under the Sunset Laws on July 1, 1979. … Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County v. Oklahoma Tax Commission et al., (City of Tulsa et al.) Interveners 212 P.2d 462 (1949) .
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 23, 1970
Dowell v. Board of Education of Oklahoma City, 185 Okl. 342 , 91 P.2d 771 (1939); McGowen, et al v. … Board of Education of Union Graded School District No. 25, et al, 188 Okl. 625 , 112 P.2d 355 (1941); Independent Consol. School Dist. No. 7 of Harrah, et al v. Bowen, 199 Okl. 92 , 183 P.2d 251 , 254 (1947).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 13, 2002
The Board shall establish an examination to be used by the Board to determine the proficiency [sic] any a chiropractic physician who seeks certification from the Board. … Grand River Dam Auth. v. State, 645 P.2d 1011 , 1016 (Okla. 1982).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 11, 1968
Brickell v. State Election Board, 203 Okl. 362 , 221 P.2d 785 (1950), Carlile v. Nat. Oil and Development Company, 83 Okl. 217 , 201 P. 377 (1921). … Federal Land Bank of Wichita, Kansas v. Howell, 123 F.2d 50 (10th Cir. 1941).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 16, 1994
For example, see O'Brien v. … In Williams Petroleum Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 30, 1973
Your question centers upon the existing authority of the Board pursuant to 82 O.S. 864 [ 82-864 ] (1971) to separate the job classification into a secretary and a treasurer. We refer you to Johnson v. … (Cites omitted) " In Dunlap v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 25, 1968
In the case of People v. … And, in the case of the City of Dayton v. Horstman, Ohio Com.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 20, 1976
In Delaware County Excise Board v. St. Louis v. San Francisco Railroad Company, 49 P.2d 523 , the Supreme Court discussed the levy of the gasoline tax and its purpose: ". . . … Board of County Commissioners of Harmon County v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 26, 1989
State v. Evans, 319 P.2d 1112 , 1116-1117 (Okla. 1957). … As stated by the Oklahoma Supreme Court in City of Duncan v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 16, 1973
And in Dunn v. Tyler Independent School District, 327 F. … In James v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 23, 1975
In Galuan v. Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, 452 P.2d 930 , the Court sets forth the basic distinction between licensing and registration. … And, the Oklahoma Supreme Court in Boydston v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 22, 1992
IN DETERMINING WHETHER THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY HAS A DUTY TO PROVIDE LEGAL ADVICE TO MEMBERS OF COUNTY FAIR BOARDS, WE MUST DETERMINE WHETHER BOARD MEMBERS ARE COUNTY OFFICERS. … THE ANALYSIS IN THAT OPINION WHICH SUPPORTED THE CONCLUSION THAT THE POSITION OF DIRECTOR OF A COUNTY FREE FAIR ASSOCIATION WAS A PUBLIC OFFICE CONSIDERED THE CRITERIA ESTABLISHED IN THE CASE OF GUTHRIE DAILY LEADER V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 9, 1980
In Excise Board of Stephens County v. Chicago, R.I. P. Ry. … Board of Commissioners of Logan County v. State ex rel.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 13, 1972
See also Haslett v. Board of Commissioners of Muskogee County, 168 Okl. 290 , 32 P.2d 940 (1934) and Board of County Commissioners of Harmon County v. King, 194 Okl. 593 , 153 P.2d 483 (1944). … See also Haslett v. Board of Commissioners of Muskogee County, 168 Okl. 290 , 32 P.2d 940 (1934) and Board of County Commissioners of Harmon County v. King, 194 Okl. 593 , 153 P.2d 483 (1944).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 4, 1951
OCTOBER 29, 1949 — SONGER WHICH CONCLUDED: " IT IS OPINION THAT MEMBERSHIP ON A BOARD OF EDUCATION (SCHOOL BOARD) OF A SCHOOL DISTRICT IS AN " OFFICE UNDER THE LAWS OF THIS STATE "; THAT MEMBERSHIP ON THE COUNTY EXCISE BOARD … DISTRICT AND THE OFFICE OF MEMBER OF THE COUNTY EXCISE BOARD AND BOARD OF EQUALIZATION AT THE SAME TIME; AND THAT, UNDER THE RULE ANNOUNCED AND APPLIED IN THE CASE OF " GIBSON V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 13, 2000
Naylor v. Petuskey, 834 P.2d 439 , 440 (Okla. 1992) (citing Humphrey v. Denney, 757 P.2d 833 (Okla. 1988)). … Legislative intent is ascertained by scrutinizing the Board's licensure law in its entirety rather than by its individual provisions. See McNeill v. City of Tulsa, 953 P.2d 329 , 332 (Okla. 1998).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 29, 1977
In Swatek Construction Co. v. Williams, 177 Okl. 305 , 58 P.2d 585 , 587 , the Oklahoma Supreme Court quoting from Good v. … of equalization but would become effective only with future appointments to such boards.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna