Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,251 results
0.81s
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 7, 1997
Allen v. … Grand River Dam Authority v. State, 645 P.2d 1011 , 1018 (Okla. 1982). Where the intent is clearly stated in the statute, no further statutory construction is necessary. Hughes Drilling Company v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 21, 1991
NO. 80-221; BURKHARDT V. CITY OF ENID, 771 P.2D 608, 611 (OKLA. 1989); VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS V. CHILDERS, 171 P.2D 618 (OKLA. 1946); HAWKS V. BLAND, 9 P.2D 720 (OKLA. 1932); YETTE V. … WAY V. GRAND LAKE ASSOCIATION. INC., 635 P.2D 1010, 1015-1018 (OKLA. 1981).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 20, 1988
Taber v. Carter Oil Co., 57 P.2d 248 (Okla. 1936); Fearnside v. Graham, 1 P.2d 763 (Okla. 1931). … Midwest City v. Harris, 561 P.2d 1357 (Okla. 1977). The intended effect of 68 O.S. 2467 was to provide an adequate remedy to the taxpayer without disrupting the local budget process.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 17, 1968
Excise Board of Washita County v. Lowden, 189 Okl. 286 , 116 P.2d 700 , 702." … In the case of Board of Commissioners of Tulsa County v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 8, 2001
Oglesby v. Lib. Mut. Ins. Co., 832 P.2d 834 , 844 (Okla. 1992). … McNeill v. City of Tulsa, 953 P.2d 329 , 332 (Okla. 1998) (citing Simpson v. Okla. Alcoholic Bev. Control Bd., 409 P.2d 364 , 367 (Okla. 1965)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 17, 1968
Hedges v. Groom, 194 Okl. 384 , 151 P.2d 936 (1944). Where the language is clear and unambiguous a statute must be held to mean what it plainly expresses and no room is left for construction. Rierks v. … Smith v. Nebraska Liquor Control Commission, 152 Neb. 676 , 42 N.W.2d 297 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 4, 1994
BY THE BOARD AND MAY NOT MEET THE SAME STANDARDS AS SCHOOLS REGULATED BY THE BOARD ARE REQUIRED TO MEET TO BE LICENSED. … WHAT CONSTITUTES A SCHOOL IS NOT EXPLAINED BY THE CODE, BUT WORDS FOUND IN STATUTES ARE TO BE UNDERSTOOD IN THEIR ORDINARY SENSE EXCEPT WHEN A CONTRARY INTENTION PLAINLY APPEARS. 25 O.S. 1 (1991); HESS V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedQuestion Submitted by: The Honorable Mike Osburn, Oklahoma House of Representatives, District 81
2026 OK AG 9 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 16, 2026
See 70 O.S.Supp.2024, § 14-108 Marley v. Cannon , 1980 OK 147 618 P.2d 401 ¶7 By statute, the Legislature largely delegated to the Board the power to determine what courses and services are offered at CareerTechs. … McClure v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 29, 1968
In Cook et al. v. Cordell, 160 Okl. 59 , 15 P.2d 565 , the court stated: ". . . … Shaw v. Grumbine, 137 Okl. 95 , 297 P. 315 ; Hines v. Winters, Okl. 320 P.2d 1114 . In Trapp, State Auditor v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 18, 1993
Federal credit unions are governed by the National Credit Union Administration Board (the "Federal Board); in Oklahoma state credit unions are governed by the Oklahoma Credit Union Board (the State Board). 12 U.S.C.A. 1766 … Oral Roberts University v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, 714 P.2d 1013 (Okla. 1985). see also, United Airlines Inc. v. State Board of Equalization, 789 P.2d 1305 (Okla. 1990); McCain v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 3, 1972
See also Sachem's Head Property Owners' Association v. Town of Guilford, 112 Conn. 515 , 517 , 152 A. 877 ; State ex rel Malkin v. … For colleges, control is in the state; for high schools and grade schools, control is local, and rests in the local board, subject to the will of the people." Muse v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 23, 1970
In Sutto v. Board of Medical Registration and Examination, 242 Ind. … and material requirements, i.e., four thousand 60-minute hours resident attendance in class " In Pennsylvania Board of Undertakers v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 1, 1994
YOUR LETTER REFERS TO THE ABILITY OF THE BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC EXAMINERS ("BOARD") TO ENFORCE THIS PROVISION. … V. OKLAHOMA CORPORATION COMMISSION, 829 P.2D 964 (OKLA.1992).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 29, 1975
In Guthrie Daily Leader v. … In Gibson v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 21, 2002
Coll. v. … Dist. v. Wis.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 18, 1968
In Board of Education of Independent School District Number One of Tulsa County v. S. J. … In Board of Education of Independent School District Number One of Tulsa County v. S. J.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 7, 1971
Co. v. Colvert, 100 P.2d 1005 , 1008 (Okl. 1940) stated: "The word employed by the legislature deposit has a definite meaning. . ." and goes on to quote 7 Am. … Having been either designated by statute or appointed by a board of education, a treasurer of a school district is the agent of the school board or board of education.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 1, 1996
Austin Western Road Machinery Company v. … It is well established in Oklahoma that the board of county commissioners "has general control over the property and finances of the county." Cavin v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 15, 2007
We begin by noting that the State Board of Corrections ("Board") is not a constitutionally created board, but a creation of statute. … The Legislature is restricted from limiting the powers of constitutional boards . Bd. of Regents v. Baker , 638 P.2d 464 , 466 (Okla. 1981).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 17, 1989
Article II , Section 3 . ¶ 14 In Bridges v. … Cartwright v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna