Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,251 results
0.62s
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 6, 1980
Roberts v. Ledgerwood, 134 Okl. 152 , 272 P. 448 (1929). Elias v. … In Tulsa Exposition Fair Corp. v. Board of Co.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 29, 1976
See Mann v. Nyquist, 71 N.Y. Misc.2d 435, 336 N.Y.2d 270 (1972), and Sinapkin v. Nyquist, 68 N.Y. Misc.2d 214, 325 N.Y. Supp. 823 (1971). … See, State v. Board of Education of City of Duluth, 213 Minn. 550 , 7 N.W.2d 544 (1943). However, the principal purpose of the tenure statutes is to secure permanency in the teaching force.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 30, 1996
Article V , Section 55 (emphasis added). ¶ 2 In both State v. Carter, 30 P.2d 700 , 703 (Okla. 1934), and Miller v. … As the Oklahoma Supreme Court recognized years ago in Miller v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 12, 1990
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CHOCTAW NATION V. CRAYTOR, 600 P.2D 314 (OKL. 1979). … ELIMINATION/SUPERVISION OF THE BOARD.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 6, 1989
SEE SPEARMAN V. … V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 26, 1979
must, nonetheless, be licensed by the Board. … The Board may not, by rule or regulation, exempt certain persons from licensing requirements under the statute. The Board has only those powers delegated to it. Adams v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 15, 1970
STATE PERSONNEL BOARD — WITNESS FEES AND MILEAGE NOT PAID Oklahoma State Personnel Board. … Bd. of Educ. of Oklahoma City v. State Bd. of Educ., 197 Okl. 141 , 169 P.2d 795 (1946).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 7, 1997
Allen v. … Grand River Dam Authority v. State, 645 P.2d 1011 , 1018 (Okla. 1982). Where the intent is clearly stated in the statute, no further statutory construction is necessary. Hughes Drilling Company v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 30, 1993
CITING FARLEY V. … CLEARLY THEN, THESE FUNDS ARE PUBLIC IN NATURE, OLUSTEE CO-OPERATIVE ASSOCIATION V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 10, 1984
MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF CITY OF CLINTON — 53 A.2D 790 ', ' FLETCHER V. FEENEY — 400 A.2D 1084 ', ' LEONE V. BREWER — 184 N.E. 111 ', ' MICHAELS V. … TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE OF PEMBERTON TOWNSHIP — 67 A.2D 324 ', ' STATE EX REL KRAMER V. SCHWARTZ — 82 S.W.2d 63 ', ' NUCHOLLS V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 31, 1973
BOARDS OF EDUCATION — VACANCIES Except where it is provided by law that annexation resulting in abolition of both boards of education, if a vacancy occurs on a local board of education of a school district to which another … Dickey Clay Manufacturing Co. v. Fergerson Insurance Co., 388 P.2d 300 (1963).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 20, 2001
State v. Day, 882 P.2d 1096 , 1098 (Okla.Crim. 1994) (citation omitted). A person cannot be criminally punished if the application of the criminal statute to his conduct is doubtful. Quinn v. … Ethics Comm'n v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 20, 1990
BOARD OF REGENTS FOR OKL. A M COLLEGES V. OKL. STATE REGENTS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION, 497 P.2D 1062, 1069 (OKLA. 1972). … BOARD OF REGENTS FOR OKL. A M COLLEGES V. OKL. STATE REGENTS, SUPRA, 497 P.2D 1062. 1067.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 8, 1970
See Alias v. City of Tulsa, Okl., 408 P.2d 517 (1965); Application of Oklahoma Turnpike Authority, Okl., 416 P.2d 860 (1966). … Sanchez v. Melvin, Okl., 418 P.2d 639 (1966); Taff v. State, Okl., 425 P.2d 970 (1966).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 1, 1968
In the case of Benson v. Department of Labor, 180 Wn. 655 , 41 P.2d 404 , the Washington court held that those hired by an authorized agent of the county and compensated by county funds are county employees. … In Chavez v. Sprague, 209 C.A.2d 101, 25 Cal.Rptr. 603 , the California court held that a volunteer member of a county hospital staff is a county employee for the purposes of being immune from suit by indigent patients.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 21, 2002
Coll. v. … Dist. v. Wis.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 9, 1979
Senate Bill No. 33, provides for the recreation of eight state boards These boards were due to terminate under the Sunset Laws on July 1, 1979. … Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County v. Oklahoma Tax Commission et al., (City of Tulsa et al.) Interveners 212 P.2d 462 (1949) .
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 18, 1969
The general rule concerning powers of an administrative agency was expressed in the first paragraph of the syllabus in Boydston v. … board itself."
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 29, 1975
In Guthrie Daily Leader v. … In Gibson v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 7, 1971
Co. v. Colvert, 100 P.2d 1005 , 1008 (Okl. 1940) stated: "The word employed by the legislature deposit has a definite meaning. . ." and goes on to quote 7 Am. … Having been either designated by statute or appointed by a board of education, a treasurer of a school district is the agent of the school board or board of education.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna