Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,251 results
0.85s
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 20, 1990
BOARD OF REGENTS FOR OKL. A M COLLEGES V. OKL. STATE REGENTS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION, 497 P.2D 1062, 1069 (OKLA. 1972). … BOARD OF REGENTS FOR OKL. A M COLLEGES V. OKL. STATE REGENTS, SUPRA, 497 P.2D 1062. 1067.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 26, 1989
State v. Evans, 319 P.2d 1112 , 1116-1117 (Okla. 1957). … As stated by the Oklahoma Supreme Court in City of Duncan v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 25, 1976
Hines v. … In Mott v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 4, 1971
Bailey v. State Board of Public Affairs (1951) 194 Okl. 495 , 153 P.2d 235 ; Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. State, 230 P.2d 260 . … U.S. v. Falk, (1907) 204 U.S. 143 , 51 L.ed 411 , Cf. Texas State Board of Examiners in Optometry v. Carp, (1967) 412 S.W.2d 307 , 389 U.S. 52 , 19 L.ed.2d 51 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 23, 1975
In Galuan v. Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, 452 P.2d 930 , the Court sets forth the basic distinction between licensing and registration. … And, the Oklahoma Supreme Court in Boydston v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 25, 1968
In United States v. … In U.S. v. Germaine, 99 U.S. 508 ; Hall v. Wisconsin, 103 U.S. 5 , 8 ; U.S. v. Perkins, 116 U.S. 483 , 6 Sup. Ct. 449 ; U.S. v. Mouat, 124 U.S. 303 , 8 Sup. Ct. 505 ; U.S. v. Smith, 124 U.S. 525 , 8 Sup.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 1, 1968
The board or officer must administer the licensing statute in accordance with its provisions." The Oklahoma Supreme Court in Boydston v. … Eslin v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 6, 1969
Boards of Education — Travel Expenses A board of education may legally pay the expenses of one or more of its members to attend the National School Administrators Convention and the National School Boards Association Convention … The board must still determine within its own discretion what travel is necessary, suitable, and proper for the needs of the particular school district. In the case of Kay County, Excise Board v. Atchison, T. S.F.R.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 24, 1972
** Summary ** CALLING SPECIAL SCHOOL BOARD ELECTION A local board of education of a school district is not authorized to call a special election for purposes of filling a vacancy on said board; a county election board is … matter prevails over a general statute which does not refer to particular subject matter but does contain language which might be broad enough to cover the subject matter if a special statute was not in existence, Reubin v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 30, 2011
Jobe v. State ex rel. Dep `t of Pub. Safety , 243 P.3d 1171 , 1175 (Okla. 2010). … Rogers v. Quiktrip Corp. , 230 P.3d 853 , 859 (Okla. 2010).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 3, 1994
The second part of question one is whether the board has the power to attach covenants running with the land to property the board is selling. The case of Carlyle v. Independent School Dist. … I-71, 811 P.2d 618 , 620 (Okla.App. 1991) citing Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. Cloudman, 185 Okla.400, 92 P.2d 837 , 841 (1939), addresses the general issue of local school board power.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 6, 1993
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL HAS RECEIVED YOUR LETTER ASKING, IN EFFECT, THE FOLLOWING QUESTION: MAY THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF REGISTERED DENTISTS (THE "DENTAL BOARD") CEASE THE ISSUANCE OF TEMPORARY CERTIFICATES OF ABILITY TO PRACTICE … TRUNK V. HERTZ CORP., 200 N.E.2D 894, 896 (OHIO APP. 1964); WOLVERINE SHOE AND TANNING CORP. V. ALDEN'S. INC., 35 F.R.D. 342 , 343 (W.D. MICH. 1964).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 1, 1972
An early Oklahoma case, The Guthrie Daily Leader v. … Further, in Mid-Continent Building Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 17, 1992
ACCORDING TO YOUR LETTER, A NONPROFIT OKLAHOMA CORPORATION HAS ASKED THE OKLAHOMA BOARD OF PRIVATE VOCATIONAL SCHOOLS (BOARD) TO EXEMPT IT FROM THE BOARD'S LICENSING REQUIREMENTS BECAUSE IT IS A TAX EXEMPT ORGANIZATION UNDER … V. CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY, 620 P.2D 452 (OKLA. CT. APP. 1979). STATUTES DEALING WITH THE SAME GENERAL SUBJECT SHOULD BE CONSTRUED TOGETHER IN ORDER TO ARRIVE AT THE LEGISLATIVE INTENT IN ANY PARTICULAR SECTION. TWA V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 18, 1971
In making this determination it should be noted at the outset that numerous court decisions hold that Boards of County Commissioners are limited to powers specifically authorized to them. Larimore, et al v. … Board of Commissioners of Okmulgee County, 200 Okl. 436 , 195 P.2d 762 . Allen, et al v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedQuestion Submitted by: Oklahoma County District Attorney Vicki Zemp Behenna
2026 OK AG 8 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 11, 2026
Deputy Sheriff's F.O.P., Lodge 188 v. Bd. of Cnty. … The Jail Trust is overseen by nine trustees: One Board member, the Oklahoma County Sheriff, one appointee by each of the three Board members, and four appointees chosen by a majority vote of the Board. Id. , art. VII.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 11, 1973
The role of the State Board of Education is revealed by the following language: "After review of the matter the State Board of Education shall issue its decision either confirming the action of the local board of education … See Consolidated Motor Freight Terminal, et al. v. Vineyard, et al., 143 P.2d 610 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 17, 1975
Oklahoma City v. Century Indemnity Company, 62 P.2d 94 (1936); Sparks v. Board of Library Trustees of Carter County, 169 P.2d 201 (1946). … In Book v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 17, 1975
constitutes an equivalent, recompense, or remuneration and the term clearly connotes something given in return for services rendered as distinct from a gift, bonus or other form of gratuitous or voluntary payment, Mathews v. … Board of Education of the Town of Eruington, 106 A.2d 346 (N.J. 1954), and State v. Sheldon, 111 N.W. 372 (Neb. 1907).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 11, 1968
for such action and an opportunity for the teacher to appear before such board and be heard on the question of reconsideration of such action by the board. . . ." … Moral Insurance Co. v. Cooksey, Okl. 285 P.2d 223 . State ex rel. v. Zabloudil, 206 Okl. 286 , 242 P.2d 710 . However, under the facts given in your inquiry, the teacher has not "served three years."
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna