Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersoklaag

2,251 results

1.00s

  • Opinion No. (1979)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 15, 1979

    Inasmuch as members of a board of education customarily assume office by the electoral process, it is clear that none serve by con tract. The leading case defining a public officer is State v. Sowards, 64 Okla. … See also Farley v. Bd. of Education of City of Perry, 62 Okla. 181 , 162 P. 797 (1917). It is clear under the foregoing authority that a member of a school board or board of education is an "officer."

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 72-253 (1972) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 12, 1973

    and the relationship of the United States and their powers concerning waters within the State is found in the case of Oklahoma Water Resources Board v. … This expansion of the power of the Oklahoma Water Resources Board coupled with the Oklahoma Supreme Court's pronouncement in The Oklahoma Water Resources Board v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1999)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 29, 1999

    Oklahoma Journal Publishing Company v. Oklahoma City, 620 P.2d 452 , 454 (Okl.Ct.App. 1980). … City of Duncan v. Bingham, 394 P. 2d 456 , 460 (Okla. 1964).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2005)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 5, 2005

    Brotton Corp. v. Okla. … The adoption of this rule prevents the potential discriminatory application of the Board's discretion. See Hennessey v. Indep. Sch. Dist.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1998)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 27, 1998

    Marley v. Cannon, 618 P.2d 401 , 405 (Okla. 1980). A. … State v. Warren, 331 P.2d 405 , 408 (Okla. 1958) (Board of Agriculture has implied right to seek injunction to prevent violation of Oklahoma egg law); Board of Examiners in Veterinary Medicine v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1990)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 19, 1990

    HOOVER V. BRACKEN ENERGIES. INC. V. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, 723 F.2D 1488 (10TH CIR. 1983), CERT. DENIED, 105 S.CT. 93 ; CLINKENBEARD V. FRAZIER, 582 P.2D 413 (OKL. APP. 1978). … IT IS INAPPROPRIATE FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE TO USURP THE BOARD'S RESPONSIBILITY IN INTERPRETING ITS STATUTE, ESPECIALLY WHEN MATTERS ARE PENDING BEFORE THE BOARD.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2001)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 8, 2001

    Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd. v. Moss, 509 P.2d 666 , 668 (Okla. 1973) (quoting Boydston v. … Ethics Comm'n v. Keating, 958 P.2d 1250 , 1256 (Okla. 1998) (citing City of Duncan v. Bingham, 394 P.2d 456 , 459-60 (Okla. 1964)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 75-197 (1975) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 29, 1975

    Our previous opinion answered your question in the negative and relied upon a recent opinion of the Florida Supreme Court in Canney v. … In State v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2003)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 7, 2003

    ."); State v. … Wimberly v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1988)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 15, 1988

    HESS V. EXCISE BOARD OF MCCURTAIN COUNTY. 698 P.2D 930 (OKLA. 1985). … OKLAHOMA ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL BOARD V. MOSS, 509 P.2D 666 (OKLA. 1973).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2003)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 19, 2003

    Board. … Arbuckle Abstract Co. v. Scott, 975 P.2d 879 , 886 (Okla. 1998).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1991) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 23, 1991

    DIERKS V. WALSH, 218 P.2D 920 (OKLA. 1950). … AND/OR POSSIBLE BOARD ACTION.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1995)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 12, 1995

    In that opinion, the Attorney General, while construing the dual office holding provisions of 51 O.S. 6 (1971), cited State v. … See also, Tarabashi v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1999)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 19, 1999

    Corp. v. Oklahoma Corp. Comm., 829 P.2d 964 , 969 (Okla. 1992). … See Associated Indus. of Oklahoma v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 77-183 (1977) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 9, 1977

    In Allen v. … This statement of rule of law was reaffirmed in Lairmore v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 12, 1975

    In the case of Perma-Stone Oklahoma City Company v. … In the case of Realty Mortgage and Sales Company v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1985)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 8, 1985

    McGowan v. Maryland , 366 U.S. 420 , 425-426 , 81 S.Ct. 1101 , 6 L.Ed.2d 393 (1961). To answer your question we must examine the history behind Okla. Const. … Article VI , Section 31a in the case of Board of Regents, Okla. A. M. Col. v. Oklahoma State Regents , 497 P.2d 1062 (Okla. 1972).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1979)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 28, 1979

    In Miller v. … In Stigall v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1997)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 9, 1997

    Thomas v. Oklahoma Orthopedic and Arthritis Foundation, 903 P.2d 279 , 284 (Okla. 1995). ¶ 3 Subsections (A) and (B)(1) of 59 O.S. … Ledbetter v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Law Enforcement Commission, 764 P.2d 172 , 179 (Okla. 1988).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1998)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 23, 1998

    Poulous v. … Poulous v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.