Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,251 results
1.00s
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 15, 1979
Inasmuch as members of a board of education customarily assume office by the electoral process, it is clear that none serve by con tract. The leading case defining a public officer is State v. Sowards, 64 Okla. … See also Farley v. Bd. of Education of City of Perry, 62 Okla. 181 , 162 P. 797 (1917). It is clear under the foregoing authority that a member of a school board or board of education is an "officer."
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 12, 1973
and the relationship of the United States and their powers concerning waters within the State is found in the case of Oklahoma Water Resources Board v. … This expansion of the power of the Oklahoma Water Resources Board coupled with the Oklahoma Supreme Court's pronouncement in The Oklahoma Water Resources Board v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 29, 1999
Oklahoma Journal Publishing Company v. Oklahoma City, 620 P.2d 452 , 454 (Okl.Ct.App. 1980). … City of Duncan v. Bingham, 394 P. 2d 456 , 460 (Okla. 1964).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 5, 2005
Brotton Corp. v. Okla. … The adoption of this rule prevents the potential discriminatory application of the Board's discretion. See Hennessey v. Indep. Sch. Dist.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 27, 1998
Marley v. Cannon, 618 P.2d 401 , 405 (Okla. 1980). A. … State v. Warren, 331 P.2d 405 , 408 (Okla. 1958) (Board of Agriculture has implied right to seek injunction to prevent violation of Oklahoma egg law); Board of Examiners in Veterinary Medicine v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 19, 1990
HOOVER V. BRACKEN ENERGIES. INC. V. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, 723 F.2D 1488 (10TH CIR. 1983), CERT. DENIED, 105 S.CT. 93 ; CLINKENBEARD V. FRAZIER, 582 P.2D 413 (OKL. APP. 1978). … IT IS INAPPROPRIATE FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE TO USURP THE BOARD'S RESPONSIBILITY IN INTERPRETING ITS STATUTE, ESPECIALLY WHEN MATTERS ARE PENDING BEFORE THE BOARD.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 8, 2001
Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd. v. Moss, 509 P.2d 666 , 668 (Okla. 1973) (quoting Boydston v. … Ethics Comm'n v. Keating, 958 P.2d 1250 , 1256 (Okla. 1998) (citing City of Duncan v. Bingham, 394 P.2d 456 , 459-60 (Okla. 1964)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 29, 1975
Our previous opinion answered your question in the negative and relied upon a recent opinion of the Florida Supreme Court in Canney v. … In State v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 7, 2003
."); State v. … Wimberly v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 15, 1988
HESS V. EXCISE BOARD OF MCCURTAIN COUNTY. 698 P.2D 930 (OKLA. 1985). … OKLAHOMA ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL BOARD V. MOSS, 509 P.2D 666 (OKLA. 1973).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 19, 2003
Board. … Arbuckle Abstract Co. v. Scott, 975 P.2d 879 , 886 (Okla. 1998).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 23, 1991
DIERKS V. WALSH, 218 P.2D 920 (OKLA. 1950). … AND/OR POSSIBLE BOARD ACTION.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 12, 1995
In that opinion, the Attorney General, while construing the dual office holding provisions of 51 O.S. 6 (1971), cited State v. … See also, Tarabashi v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 19, 1999
Corp. v. Oklahoma Corp. Comm., 829 P.2d 964 , 969 (Okla. 1992). … See Associated Indus. of Oklahoma v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 9, 1977
In Allen v. … This statement of rule of law was reaffirmed in Lairmore v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 12, 1975
In the case of Perma-Stone Oklahoma City Company v. … In the case of Realty Mortgage and Sales Company v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 8, 1985
McGowan v. Maryland , 366 U.S. 420 , 425-426 , 81 S.Ct. 1101 , 6 L.Ed.2d 393 (1961). To answer your question we must examine the history behind Okla. Const. … Article VI , Section 31a in the case of Board of Regents, Okla. A. M. Col. v. Oklahoma State Regents , 497 P.2d 1062 (Okla. 1972).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 28, 1979
In Miller v. … In Stigall v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 9, 1997
Thomas v. Oklahoma Orthopedic and Arthritis Foundation, 903 P.2d 279 , 284 (Okla. 1995). ¶ 3 Subsections (A) and (B)(1) of 59 O.S. … Ledbetter v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Law Enforcement Commission, 764 P.2d 172 , 179 (Okla. 1988).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 23, 1998
Poulous v. … Poulous v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna