Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,251 results
1.79s
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 18, 1992
UNITED STATES V. MISSISSIPPI VALLEY GENERATING CO., 364 U.S. 520 , 81 S.CT. 294 , 5 L.ED. 2D 268 (1961); YOUNGBLOOD V. CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 3. PAYNE COUNTY, 230 P. 310 (OKLA. 1924).) … STATE V. SOWARDS, 82 P.2D 324 (OKLA.CR. 1938).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 15, 1970
In consequence, the Order of the Board of County Commissioners is presently in effect. In Edge v. … In Butler v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 11, 1971
With respect to the first question, we point out that the Board on Legislative Compensation has only such powers as are granted to it by the Oklahoma Constitution in Article V , Section 21 . … See State ex rel Ogden v. Hunt, 286 P.2d 1088 ; and Hines v. Winters, 320 P.2d 1114 . The Attorney General has also considered the relationship of the Board to the Legislature.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 29, 1992
MITCHENER V. CITY COM'RS. OF CITY OF OKMULGEE, 228 P. 159 (OKLA.1924); WORLEY V. FRENCH, 85 P.2D 296 (OKLA.1938): BOARD OF EDUCATION OF OKLA. CITY V. CLOUDMAN, 92 P.2D 837 (OKLA.1939); DEVELOPMENT INDUSTRIES. INC. V. … CITY OF NORMAN, 412 P.2D 953 (OKLA.1966); MOREHEAD V. DYER, 518 P.2D 1105 (OKLA.1973). BY STATUTE, THE GOVERNING BOARD OF EACH SCHOOL DISTRICT IS THE LOCAL BOARD OF EDUCATION IN EACH DISTRICT. 70 O.S. 5 -106 (1991).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 12, 1972
Taylor v. State, Okl. Cr., 377 P.2d 508 (1962). … See also Sterling Drug, Inc. v. FTC, 450 F.2d 698 (D.C. Cir. 1971); State v. Worten, 167 Okl. 187 , 29 P.2d 1 (1933);Stone v. Hodges, Okl., 435 P.2d 165 (1967); Shirnnel v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 12, 1973
and the relationship of the United States and their powers concerning waters within the State is found in the case of Oklahoma Water Resources Board v. … This expansion of the power of the Oklahoma Water Resources Board coupled with the Oklahoma Supreme Court's pronouncement in The Oklahoma Water Resources Board v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 16, 1976
In Oliver v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, Okl., 359 P.2d 183 (1961), the issue of legislative authority versus Board power was squarely met. … In Gambulos v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 27, 1998
Marley v. Cannon, 618 P.2d 401 , 405 (Okla. 1980). A. … State v. Warren, 331 P.2d 405 , 408 (Okla. 1958) (Board of Agriculture has implied right to seek injunction to prevent violation of Oklahoma egg law); Board of Examiners in Veterinary Medicine v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 19, 1990
HOOVER V. BRACKEN ENERGIES. INC. V. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, 723 F.2D 1488 (10TH CIR. 1983), CERT. DENIED, 105 S.CT. 93 ; CLINKENBEARD V. FRAZIER, 582 P.2D 413 (OKL. APP. 1978). … IT IS INAPPROPRIATE FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE TO USURP THE BOARD'S RESPONSIBILITY IN INTERPRETING ITS STATUTE, ESPECIALLY WHEN MATTERS ARE PENDING BEFORE THE BOARD.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 30, 1993
IN WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION V. … TXO PRODUCTION V. OKLAHOMA CORPORATION COMMISSION, 829 P.2D 964, 969 (OKL.1992).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 29, 1975
Our previous opinion answered your question in the negative and relied upon a recent opinion of the Florida Supreme Court in Canney v. … In State v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 15, 1988
HESS V. EXCISE BOARD OF MCCURTAIN COUNTY. 698 P.2D 930 (OKLA. 1985). … OKLAHOMA ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL BOARD V. MOSS, 509 P.2D 666 (OKLA. 1973).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 15, 1979
Inasmuch as members of a board of education customarily assume office by the electoral process, it is clear that none serve by con tract. The leading case defining a public officer is State v. Sowards, 64 Okla. … See also Farley v. Bd. of Education of City of Perry, 62 Okla. 181 , 162 P. 797 (1917). It is clear under the foregoing authority that a member of a school board or board of education is an "officer."
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 19, 2003
Board. … Arbuckle Abstract Co. v. Scott, 975 P.2d 879 , 886 (Okla. 1998).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 29, 1999
Oklahoma Journal Publishing Company v. Oklahoma City, 620 P.2d 452 , 454 (Okl.Ct.App. 1980). … City of Duncan v. Bingham, 394 P. 2d 456 , 460 (Okla. 1964).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 12, 1995
In that opinion, the Attorney General, while construing the dual office holding provisions of 51 O.S. 6 (1971), cited State v. … See also, Tarabashi v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 19, 1999
Corp. v. Oklahoma Corp. Comm., 829 P.2d 964 , 969 (Okla. 1992). … See Associated Indus. of Oklahoma v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 9, 1977
In Allen v. … This statement of rule of law was reaffirmed in Lairmore v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 8, 1985
McGowan v. Maryland , 366 U.S. 420 , 425-426 , 81 S.Ct. 1101 , 6 L.Ed.2d 393 (1961). To answer your question we must examine the history behind Okla. Const. … Article VI , Section 31a in the case of Board of Regents, Okla. A. M. Col. v. Oklahoma State Regents , 497 P.2d 1062 (Okla. 1972).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 28, 1979
In Miller v. … In Stigall v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna