Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,251 results
0.95s
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 19, 1999
See also Civil Aeronautics Board v. … All we hold is that, if the Board wishes to do so, it must proceed in the manner authorized by statute."). See also INS v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 26, 1989
State v. Tapp, 380 P.2D 260, 265 (Okla. 1963). See also Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. Corporation Commission, 216 P. 917 (Okla. 1923); Board of Education of City of Okmulgee v. … State Board of Education, 200 P.2d 394 (Okla. 1948); Curtis v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 22, 1988
HESS V. EXCISE BOARD OF MCCURTAIN COUNTY, 698 P.2D 930 (OKLA. 1985). … SEE GOLDEN V. OKFUSKEE COUNTY ELECTION BOARD, 723 P.2D 982, 983 (OKLA. 1986); AND BOARD OF REGENTS OF OKLAHOMA AGRICULTURAL COLLEGES V. UPDEQRAFF, 237 P.2D 131, 138 (OKLA. 1951).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 31, 1978
In Zeilenga v. … Groendyke Transport, Inc. v. Gardner, Okl., 353 P.2d 695 (1960). It is further reflected in State v. Oakes, Okl., 281 P.2d 749 , 753 (1955), citing Board of County Commissioners of Creek County v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 9, 1976
The doctrine of affinity is explained in the case of State v. Hooper, 140 Kan. 481 , 37 P.2d 52 , as follows: "Degrees of relationship by affinity are computed as are degrees of relationship by consanguinity. … Hettinger v. State Deposit Trust Co. of Baltimore, Md., 79 A. 205 . Accordingly, under the factual situation you outlined in your request, the two board members previously referred to are not related by affinity.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 24, 1994
The Oklahoma Supreme Court was persuaded by the decision in the Montana case of Board of Regents of Higher Education v. … The Baker court was also influenced by the Nebraska case of Board of Regents of University of Nebraska v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 29, 1980
In Ray v. … "In the case of Farley v.
Cited 0 timesPublished2024 OK AG 14 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 27, 2024
Leo v. Oklahoma Water Res. Bd. , 2023 OK 96, ¶ 17, 536 P.3d 939, 947 (citing Rickard v. Coulimore , 2022 OK 9, ¶ 5, 505 P.3d 920, 923). This requires an examination of the statute's language. Id . … COULIMORE Discussed 2023 OK 96, 536 P.3d 939, LEO v. OKLAHOMA WATER RESOURCES BOARD Discussed Title 59.
Cited 1 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 12, 1978
U.S. v. Ray, 488 F.2d 15 (1973); Midwest City v. Harris, Okl., 561 P.2d 1357 (1977). As noted by the Court in State ex rel. Otjen v. … This authority further cites the case of O'Neal v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 16, 1991
THE TERM "PUBLIC OFFICE" WAS FIRST DEFINED IN THE CASE OF GUTHRIE DAILY LEADER V. … THIS WAS LATER FOLLOWED BY THE CASE OF OKLAHOMA CITY V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 21, 2000
For example, in Stewart v. … Also see Rawls v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 15, 1976
Further, as to the definition of the term "executive session", Attorney General's Opinion 68-247 adopted the definition set forth in Blum v. Board of Zoning, 149 N.Y.S.2d 5 , and Thomas v. … Of course, at the close of the evidentiary hearing, a board may deliberate in closed session, in the same manner as a jury does in a court case, to arrive at its decision. See Stillwater Savings and Loan Association v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 19, 2006
Corp., 437 F.3d at 1367 ; CFSM Corp. v. Elbert McKee Co., 870 F. Supp. 819 , 833 (N.D. Ill. 1994). … See, e.g., Monroe v. Scofield, 135 F.2d 725 , 726 (10th Cir. 1943) ("A director is an officer of a corporation."); Cosgriff v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 15, 1979
Inasmuch as members of a board of education customarily assume office by the electoral process, it is clear that none serve by contract. The leading case defining a public officer is State v. Sowards, 64 Okl. … See also Farley v. Bd. of Education of City of Perry, 62 Okl. 181 , 162 P. 797 (1917). It is clear under the foregoing authority that a member of a school board or board of education is an "officer."
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 8, 2001
Board of Regents v. … In the first such case, Board of Regents v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 22, 1972
In Guthrie Daily Leader v. … Therefore, under the standard of Guthrie Daily Leader v. Cameron, supra, a member of the Board of Public Accountancy is a public officer for the purposes of 51 O.S. 6 [ 51-6 ] (1971). In Gibson v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 18, 1992
City of Tulsa v. … Pursuant to Board of Regents of the Univ. of Oklahoma v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 30, 1972
The Dahl case upheld an earlier decision, Wright v. … Such a case directly in point is Board of Education of County of Raleigh v. Commercial Casualty Insurance Company, 116 W. Va. 503 , 182 S.E. 87 (1935).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 12, 1972
See Shaw v. … See Bostick v. Board of Commissioners, 19 Okl. 92 , 91 P. 1125 , Milan v. Smith-Mauer Brothers, 38 Okl. 328 , 133 P. 33 , State v. Moreland, 152 Okl. 37 , 3 P.2d 803 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 22, 1988
HESS V. EXCISE BOARD OF MCCURTAIN COUNTY, 698 P.2D 930 (OKLA. 1985). … SEE GOLDEN V. OKFUSKEE COUNTY ELECTION BOARD, 723 P.2D 982, 983 (OKLA. 1986); AND BOARD OF REGENTS OF OKLAHOMA AGRICULTURAL COLLEGES V. UPDEQRAFF, 237 P.2D 131, 138 (OKLA. 1951).
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna