Case law

Opinion No. 73-316 (1974) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 13, 1974

(Emphasis added) In the case of Board of County Commissioners of Creek County v. … In the case of Baker v.

Opinion No. (2004)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 26, 2004

Bailey v. State Bd. of Pub. Affairs, 153 P.2d 235 , 239 (Okla. 1944). … See, e.g., Tweedy v. Okla. Bar Ass'n, 624 P.2d 1049 , 1054 (Okla. 1981).

Opinion No. 77-168 (1977) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 3, 1977

Wade v. Brown, Okl., 516 P.2d 526 , Letteer v. Conservancy Dist., Okl., 385 P.2d 796 More specifically, a special statute will apply as to matters provided for therein and the general statute will not apply. Sebring v. … Ruben v. Thompson, 406 P.2d 263 (Okla. 1965). In Koch v.

Opinion No. (1988)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 1, 1988

IN BROADERICK V. … STATE OF OKLAHOMA, 413 U.S. 601 , 93 S.CT. 2908 , 37 L.ED.2D 830 (1973), THREE EMPLOYEES OF THE CORPORATION COMMISSION WERE CHARGED BY THE OLD STATE PERSONNEL BOARD WITH HAVING VIOLATED THE TERMS OF THE STATE PERSONNEL ACT

Opinion No. 78-224 (1978) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 11, 1978

See Board of County Commissioners of Muskogee County v. Hart, 119 P. 132 , Bennett v. State, 150 P. 198 (1915). … See Bridges v. City of Charlotte, 20 S.E.2d 825 , 832 (N.C. 1942). These decisions are very persuasive and it is likely that our Supreme Court would reach the same result.

Opinion No. (1996)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 15, 1996

Bettis v. Brown, 819 P.2d 1381 , 1383 (Okla.Ct.App. 1991). … See McFeely v.

Opinion No. (1989)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 14, 1989

Generally, it is the duty of the board of county commissioners in each county to furnish quarters for the local units of the Oklahoma Department of Human Services. … I-30 of Adair County v.

Question Submitted by: The Honorable Scott M. Inman, State Representative, District 94

2014 OK AG 7 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 18, 2014

As such, Article V, Section 56 of the Oklahoma Constitution requires that it contain only appropriative provisions. Id. ; see also Fent v. State ex rel. … Id. ; see Tulsa Stockyards, Inc. v.

Opinion No. 68-141 (1968) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 4, 1968

In First National Bank v. … In Albright Parking System v.

Opinion No. (2001)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 29, 2001

See Satepeahtaw v. State, 595 P.2d 805 , 806 (Okla.Crim. 1979) (characterizing housing authority's officials' diversion of housing authority monies as embezzlement of State funds). … Auth. v. Craytor, 600 P.2d 314 , 316 (Okla. 1979). Therefore, in matters of State property and the powers of State agencies, State law, rather than tribal law, controls.

Opinion No. (1979)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 19, 1979

In Austin, Nichols Co. v. … Oklahoma County Board of Tax-Roll Corrections, 578 P.2d 1200 (Okla. 1978), the Court was confronted with the following stipulated facts: Each corporate taxpayer was headquartered in New York and shipped its manufactured goods

Question Submitted by: The Honorable Scott M. Inman, State Representative, District 94

2014 OK AG 7 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 18, 2014

As such, Article V, Section 56 of the Oklahoma Constitution requires that it contain only appropriative provisions. Id. ; see also Fent v. State ex rel. … Id. ; see Tulsa Stockyards, Inc. v.

Opinion No. 70-168 (1970) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 8, 1970

In the second paragraph of its syllabus the Supreme Court of Oklahoma, In Jones v. … In Stevens v. Union Graded School Dist.

Opinion No. (1988)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 23, 1988

BOARDS, BUREAUS, COMMISSIONS, AGENCIES, TRUSTEESHIPS, AUTHORITIES, COUNCILS, COMMITTEES, PUBLIC TRUSTS, TASK FORCES OR STUDY GROUPS" IN THE STATE "SUPPORTED IN WHOLE OR IN PART BY PUBLIC FUNDS OR ENTRUSTED WITH THE EXPENDING … SANDERS V. BENTON, 579 P. 2D 815 (OKLA. 1978).

Opinion No. (1980) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 7, 1980

City of Midwest City v. Harris, Okl. 561 P.2d 1357 (1977). … The business address of a licensee is referred to in 59 O.S. 1563 [ 59-1563 ], which requires the licensee to notify the Board of the place where he engages in the fitting and sale of hearing aids.

Opinion No. (1993)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 29, 1993

STATE AGENCIES, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS HAVE SUCH POWERS AS ARE CONFERRED UPON THEM BY LAW AND SUCH AS MAY BE FAIRLY IMPLIED FROM THE STATUTE GRANTING EXPRESS POWERS. MARLEY V. CANNON, 618 P.2D 401 (OKLA.1980). … HOWEVER, AN AGENCY, BOARD OR COMMISSION HAS NO AUTHORITY TO DELEGATE AUTHORITY OR FUNCTIONS WHICH MAY BE EXERCISED ONLY BY THE STATE ENTITY. ANDERSON V. GRAND RIVER DAM AUTHORITY, 446 P.2D 814 (OKLA.1968).

Opinion No. 72-277 (1972) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 18, 1972

Applying the plain meaning construction rule as expressed in McVicker v. … Board of County Commissioners of the County of Caddo, 442 P.2d 297 , 1968 , wherein the Court stated: "All courts recognize that if the wording of a provision of a statute or constitution is plain, clear and unambiguous,

Opinion No. 74-272 (1975) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 19, 1975

This general rule has been followed in Oklahoma as set forth in Goodin v. … See also Allen v. Burkhart, 377 P.2d 821 (1963).

Opinion No. (1979)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 28, 1979

See Constitution of Oklahoma, Article V , Section 50 , Article X, Section 6, and Article X, Section 6A. … See State ex rel Dale, et al v. Sango, Okla., 194 P.215 (1921).

Opinion No. (2001)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 3, 2001

United States v. Colahan, 811 F.2d 287 , 294 (6th Cir. 1987). … Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd. v. Moss, 509 P.2d 666 , 667-68 (Okla. 1973); Marley v. Cannon, 618 P.2d 401 , 405 (Okla. 1980); In re State Bd. of Med. Exam'rs, 206 P.2d 211 , 215 (Okla. 1949). 4 IV.