Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,251 results
0.69s
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 9, 1986
State v. Bridwell , 592 P.2d 520 ,525 (Okla. 1979); accord, Whittle v. State Board of Examiners of Psychologists , 483 P.2d 328 , 329 (Okla. 1971). … See, eg., Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill , 470 U.S. 106 S.Ct., 84 L.Ed.2d 494 , 503 (1985).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 23, 2001
See Osprey L.L.C. v. Kelly-Moore Paint Co., 984 P.2d 194 , 199 (Okla. 1999). … Hall v. Globe Life Accident Ins. Co., 998 P.2d 603 , 605 (Okla. 1999) (quoting State ex rel. Trimble v. City of Moore, 818 P.2d 889 , 899 (Okla. 1991)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 12, 1972
In interpreting this Section of the Constitution and the above statute, our Court of Criminal Appeals in Walter Hickey v. State, 36 Okl. … In Perry v. State, 84 Okl. Cr. 211 , 181 P.2d 280 , (1947), the Court quoted the following language from McGarrah v. State, 10 Okl.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 5, 1992
HESS V. EXCISE BOARD OF MCCURTAIN COUNTY, 698 P.2D 930 (OKLA.1988). IN GENERAL, STATUTES ARE PRESUMED TO OPERATE PROSPECTIVELY. WICKHAM V. GULF OIL CORP., 623 P.2D 613 (OKLA.1981).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 10, 1968
It is well settled law that when statutory provisions are in conflict the last enacted provisions will prevail. 82 CJS., Statutes, Section 10 ; Brown v. Marker, Okl., 410 P.2d 61 ; Consumers Co Operative Ass'n v.
Cited 0 timesPublished2017 OK AG 11 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 6, 2017
City of Duncan v. Bingham , 1964 OK 165, ¶12 , 394 P.2d 456, 460 ; see also Cox v. State ex rel. Okla. … Adams v. Prof. Prac.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 31, 1971
Sevier v. Riley, 244 P. 323 , 198 Cal. 170 ; People ex rel McDermott v. Board of Estimate and Apportionment of City of New York, 131 N.Y.S. 604 , 146 App. Div. 515 . … Gilliam v. California Employment Stabilization Commission, 278 P.2d 528 , 130 C.A.2d 102 ; Lawson v. Kanawha County Court, 92 S.E. 786 , 80 W. Va. 612 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 5, 1987
PAUL V. DAVIS, 434 U.S. 693 , 713 , 96 S.CT. 1155 , 1166 , 47 L.ED.2D 405 (1976), QUOTED IN DOYLE V. WILSON, 529 F.SUPP. 1343, 1348 (DEL. 1982). MOREOVER, AS WAS NOTED IN A.G. OPIN. … IT WOULD THUS APPEAR THAT WHILE THERE IS PROBABLY NO FEDERAL OR STATE RIGHT TO PRIVACY WHICH PROHIBITS THE INFORMATION WHICH IS REQUIRED UNDER ENGROSSED SB 129, THE BOARD OF HEALTH, CHARGED WITH THE DUTY OF CARRYING OUT THE
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 25, 1987
AMERICAN-FIRST TITLE AND TRUST COMPANY V. … , IT WOULD SEEM THAT THE SECOND SENTENCE OF THE STATUTE, WHICH CREATES A MANDATORY DUTY O SUCH COMMISSIONER TO EXECUTE PAYMENT AND TO PAY ALL OUTSTANDING OBLIGATIONS OF THE COUNTY INCURRED BY HIM OR ON HIS BEHALF BY THE BOARD
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 13, 1974
(Emphasis added) In the case of Board of County Commissioners of Creek County v. … In the case of Baker v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 30, 1970
"b An application for registration of a brand or trade name label shall be filed by the owner of the brand or trade name if such owner is licensed by the Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, however, if the owner is … In Scandinavia Belting Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 19, 1977
In Barnes v. … State v. Hunt, Okl., 286 P.2d 1088 (1955); and Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd. v. Moss, Okl., 509 P.2d 666 (1973)." See also Oldham v. Drummond Board of Education of Ind.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 7, 2002
Russell Petroleum Co. v. Walker, 19 P.2d 582 , 587 (Okla. 1933). … Co., by through Stephens v. Park Broad. of Kentucky, Inc., 913 S.W.2d 330 , 334 (Ky.App. 1996)). See also City of New Carrollton v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 21, 1968
United States v. Hale, 39 F.2d 188 (N.D. Okla. 1930). The title of said Act reads: "An Act for the division of the lands and funds of the Osage Indians in Oklahoma Territory, and for other purposes." … Coyle v. Smith, 221 U.S. 559 , 31 S.Ct. 688 , 55 L.Ed. 853 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 1, 1988
IN BROADERICK V. … STATE OF OKLAHOMA, 413 U.S. 601 , 93 S.CT. 2908 , 37 L.ED.2D 830 (1973), THREE EMPLOYEES OF THE CORPORATION COMMISSION WERE CHARGED BY THE OLD STATE PERSONNEL BOARD WITH HAVING VIOLATED THE TERMS OF THE STATE PERSONNEL ACT
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 23, 1976
Acme Oil Gas v. Cooper, Okl., 33 P.2d 191 , 193 (1934); Baker Strawn v. Magnolia Petroleum Co., Okl., 254 P. 26 , 28 (1927). … Parks v. Smith, 204 Okl. 625 , 232 P.2d 614 ; Brown v. Manker, Okl., 410 P.2d 61 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 30, 1993
PAID TO ELECTED OFFICERS AND LEGISLATORS GIVEN THE LIMITATIONS AS TO CHANGING THEIR COMPENSATION IN THE CONSTITUTION OF OKLAHOMA, SPECIFICALLY ARTICLE VI , SECTION 6/ARTICLE VI, SECTION 34/ARTICLE XXIII, SECTION 10/ARTICLE V, … I WOULD FURTHER SUGGEST THAT THE APPROPRIATE LEGISLATIVE LEADERS AND THE BOARD ON LEGISLATIVE COMPENSATION BE ADVISED OF THIS SITUATION SO THAT THEY MAY EACH DETERMINE HOW THEY MAY WANT TO EXPRESS FUTURE COMPENSATION FOR
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 11, 1978
See Board of County Commissioners of Muskogee County v. Hart, 119 P. 132 , Bennett v. State, 150 P. 198 (1915). … See Bridges v. City of Charlotte, 20 S.E.2d 825 , 832 (N.C. 1942). These decisions are very persuasive and it is likely that our Supreme Court would reach the same result.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 6, 1976
In Jones v. … Ardmore Rod and Gun Club, 190 Okl. 470 , 125 P.2d 191 (1942); Lowden v. Washita County Excise Board, 188 Okl. 698 , 113 P.2d 370 (1941); Pawnee County Excise Board v. Kurn, 187 Okl. 110 , 101 P.2d 614 (1940); Bennett v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 31, 1974
(Emphasis added) Citing the general rule of statutory construction as laid down in McVickers v. … Board of Education of Caddo County, 442 P.2d 297 1968 , wherein the Court held that if the wording of a provision of a statute or constitution is plain, clear and unambiguous, its evident meaning must be accepted and there
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna