Case law

Opinion No. (1994)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 8, 1994

See, e.g., Lewis v. Tulsa County Excise Bd., 198 P.2d 649 , 651 (Okla. 1948); McMahan v. Board of Education of Oklahoma City, 285 P. 953 , 954 (Okla. 1930). … See, also, Texas Empire Pipe Line Co. v. Excise Board of Nowata County, 24 P.2d 988 , 991 (Okla. 1933).

Opinion No. 76-103 (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 23, 1976

As you are aware, at the time of the opinion request there was pending in the United States Supreme Court the case of Virginia State Board of Pharmacy, et al. v. … -C.I.O., et al. v. Derryberry, et al., No. 74-592-E, directly attacking the constitutionality of 59 O.S. 736 .1 [ 59-736.1 ] (1971).

Opinion No. 92-505 (1992)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 13, 1992

IN 1971, IN LEMON V. … THUS, ANY DECISION IN THIS AREA BY A SCHOOL BOARD SHOULD BE MADE IN LIGHT OF THE LEMON V. KURTZMAN, 403 U.S. 602 (1971) AND IN CLOSE CONSULTATION WITH THE SCHOOL BOARD'S COUNSEL. (NEAL LEADER)

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 10, 1975

IT SHOULD ALSO BE NOTED THAT UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF 47 O.S. 1971 97 [ 47-97 ] THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IS EMPOWERED TO COMMISSION "SPECIAL OFFICERS" FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF TRAFFIC LAWS WITHIN THE COUNTY. … ALL FUNCTIONS COMMENSURATE WITH THE POSITION OF DEPUTY SHERIFF INCLUDING THE POWER TO CARRY A WEAPON AND SERVE SEARCH WARRANTS AND WARRANTS OF ARREST. ( 19 O.S. 1971 542 [ 19-542 ], 19 O.S. 1971 541 [ 19-541 ] SEE SMITH V.

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 24, 1984

RETAINED IN THE STATEWIDE WATER DEVELOPMENT REVOLVING FUND. 82 O.S. 1085 .40 [ 82-1085.40 ](C) (C) IF MONIES IN THIS FUND ARE PLEDGED AS SECURITY AND COLLATERAL FOR INVESTMENT CERTIFICATES ISSUED BY THE WATER RESOURCES BOARD … O.S. 1085 .31 [ 82-1085.31 ], 82 O.S. 1085 .39 [ 82-1085.39 ], 82 O.S. 1085 .40 [ 82-1085.40 ](B) 82 O.S. 1085 .33 [ 82-1085.33 ], 82 O.S. 1085 .32 [ 82-1085.32 ](3) ARTICLE X, SECTION 23, ARTICLE X, SECTION 14, ARTICLE V,

Opinion No. 73-261 (1973) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 17, 1973

McVicker v. Board of County Commissioners of County of Caddo, Okl., 442 P.2d 297 , 302 (1968). … State ex rel Church of the Nazarene v. Fogo, 82 Ohio App. 238 , 79 N.E.2d 1914 , 1915 (1947), aff'd 150 Ohio St. 45 , 79 N.E.2d 546 (1948).

Opinion No. 74-165 (1974) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 22, 1974

See State ex rel White, for use and benefit of Board of Commissioners of Grady County v. Beeler, Okl. 327, P.2d 664 and Reubin v. Thompson, Okl. 406 P.2d 263 .

Question Submitted by: Mike Jackson, Executive Director, Legislative Office of Fiscal Transparency

2023 OK AG 5 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 10, 2023

."); Blum v. … ."); Richardson v.

Opinion No. 76-186 (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 28, 1976

See McVicker v. Caddo County Board of Commissioners, Okl., 442 P.2d 297 (1968). Therefore, your first question should be answered in the negative. … Board of Tax Roll Corrections of Adair County, Okl., 436 P.2d 645 (1967).

Opinion No. (1979) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 15, 1979

First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti, 435 U.S. 765 , 98 S.Ct. 1407 , 55 L.Ed.2d 707 , reh. den. (U.S.), 98 S.Ct. 3126 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1150 (1978). … McVicker v. Board of County Commissioners of Caddo County, Okla., 442 P.2d 297 (1968).

Opinion No. 72-131 (1972) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 17, 1972

In the case of Independent School District No. 1, McIntosh County v. … In the case of Boardman Company v.

Opinion No. 81-139

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 16, 1981

OF THEIR POPULATION, ARE NOT CURRENTLY AUTHORIZED TO CONDUCT FAIRS OPERATED BY AGREEMENT WITH NON PROFIT CORPORATION. (4) THE OPEN MEETING ACT, 25 O.S. 301 [ 25-301 ] — 25 O.S. 314 [ 25-314 ] APPLIES TO MEETINGS OF THE BOARD … STUDENT GROUPS) CITE: 2 O.S. 104 [2-104](L) 2 O.S. 104 [2-104](B), 2 O.S. 131 .1 [ 2-131.1 ] — 2 O.S. 131 .18 [ 2-131.18 ], 2 O.S. 31 [ 2-31 ], 2 O.S. 157 .3 [2-157.3], 2 O.S. 131 .8 [2-131.8], 2 O.S. 91 [ 2-91 ], ARTICLE V,

Opinion No. 78-170 (1978) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 31, 1978

In the case of Oklahoma Water Resources Board v. … In Curry v.

Opinion No. (1990)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 19, 1990

CITY OF DUNCAN V. BINGHAM, 394 P.2D 456, 460 (OKL.1964). … TITLE 57 O.S. 561 (B) DOES, HOWEVER, STATE THAT ANY PRIVATE PRISON CONTRACTOR WORKING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS SHALL MEET STANDARDS PRESCRIBED BY THE BOARD OF CORRECTIONS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO STANDARDS

Opinion No. 73-304 (1974) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 18, 1974

Citing the general rule of statutory construction as stated in McVicker v. … Board of County Commissioners of Caddo County, 442 P.2d 297 (1968), wherein the Court stated: "All courts recognize that if the wording of a provision of a statute or constitution is plain, clear and unambiguous, its evident

Opinion No. (2003)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 15, 2003

Ass'n of Municipal Attorneys v. … Copeland Lumber Co. v. Wilkins, 454 P.2d 821 , 822-23 (Wash. 1969); People ex rel. Dickey v. S. Ry. Co., 162 N.E.2d 417 , 420 (Ill. 1959); Hilton v.

Opinion No. (1996)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 20, 1996

Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Moss, 509 P.2d 666 , 668 (Okla. 1973). … Citicorp Savings and Trust Co. v.

Opinion No. (2006)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 14, 2006

Co. v. Galveston County, 169 S.W.2d 713 , 715 (Tex. 1943). … Id. ; see also Brown v.

Opinion No. 71-226 (1971) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 27, 1971

In this regard, see Article XVIII, Section 3, and State ex rel Short v. Callahan, 96 Okl. 276 , 221 P. 718 (1924). … Title 11 O.S. 23c [11-23c] (1970), provides as follows: "The board of trustees of every town shall consist and be composed of one member from each ward, said trustee to be elected by the town at large, but must reside in

Opinion No. 69-138 (1969) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 19, 1969

(Emphasis added) Although we find no Oklahoma cases on this point, the majority view of other jurisdictions seems to be exemplified by Board of County Com'rs of County of Fremont v. … Brokaw v. Commissioners of Highways, 130 Ill. 482 , 22 N.E. 596 , 598 , 6 L.R A. 161 , and approved by this court in Burnham Hotel Co. v.