Case law

Opinion No. 71-250 (1971) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 28, 1971

The Secretary of the State Election Board shall be secretary of the Senate and draw the salary and be allowed assistance as provided by law." … State Board of Dental Examiners v. Pollock, 125 Okl. 170 , 256 P. 927 ."

Opinion No. (1994)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 22, 1994

Clifton v. Clifton, 801 P.2d 693 (Okla. 1990). … See e.g., 68 O.S. 2864 (1991) (establishing the membership of the Board of Equalization). See also Shell Pipe Line Co. v.

Opinion No. 72-103 (1972) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 7, 1972

Included within the title of said House Bill is (1) making declaration of intent, (3) providing for apportionment and disbursement of funds by State Board of Education, (4) prescribing purpose of funds, etc. … 57 Oklahoma Constitution, is to forbid the Legislature from embracing in any one act, two or more unconnected subjects, Chastain v.

Opinion No. 75-151 (1975) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 14, 1975

or commission of any agency, board, authority or commission of the State of Oklahoma unless such member is a full-time salaried employee; provided, however, that said Oklahoma Employment Security Commission and any state … impairing the obligation of contracts, shall ever be passed . . . . " The constitutional inhibitions against impairment of contract are applicable to contracts of state as fully as to those between individuals, Fortinberry Co. v.

Opinion No. (1989)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 3, 1989

Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Brown, 519 P.2d 491 (Okla. 1974). There are no constitutional limitations prescribing a different forum to review alleged improprieties in a grand jury petition. … State ex rel Harris v. Harris, 541 P.2d 171 , 173 (Okla. 1975).

Opinion No. (1980) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 16, 1980

The statutory provisions further provide at 59 O.S. 15 .10 [ 59-15.10 ] (1971) that the Board will hold an examination of applicants for licensing at certain specified times. … Johnson v. Ward, Okl., 541 P.2d 182 (1975).

Opinion No. (1999)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 19, 1999

See Cox v. … See State v. Miller, 398 S.E.2d 547 (Ga. 1990); Daniels v. State, 448 S.E.2d 185 , 186 (Ga. 1994); and State v. Berrill, 474 S.E.2d 508 (W.Va. 1996). ¶ 10 In State v.

Opinion No. 73-327 (1973) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 28, 1973

In Hall v. … (Emphasis added) In Board of Regents of the Universities and State College of Arizona v.

Opinion No. (1988)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 7, 1988

¶ 3 The Oklahoma Supreme Court has defined the term "appropriation" in Smith v. State Board of Equalization, 630 P.2d 1264 (Okla. 1981).

Opinion No. 70-262 (1970) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 7, 1970

"In the case of Board of Commissioners of Ness County v. … The Kansas Supreme Court perhaps expresses the law even more explicitly in Board of Commissioners of Sherman County v.

Opinion No. (1989)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 30, 1989

ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS OR THOSE CHARGED WITH ENFORCING THE LAWS RELATING TO PUBLIC PEACE AND SAFETY: THE COUNTY SHERIFF, THE COUNTY TREASURER, THE COUNTY CLERK, THE COURT CLERK, THE COUNTY ASSESSOR, AND THE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD … KIRK V. BD. OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MUSKOGEE COUNTY, 595 P.2D 1334 (OKLA. 1979); 19 O.S. 1981 , 180.63E; OKLA. A.G. OPIN. NO. 81-229.

Opinion No. (2008)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 24, 2008

*Page 2 In Hughes v. Harden , 151 P.2d 425 , 426 (Okla. 1944), the Oklahoma Supreme Court held that the sale of a cemetery lot could be predicated on an oral promise without the execution of a deed. … See Silvia v.

Opinion No. (2003)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 24, 2003

The court relied on Sailors v. Board of Education, 387 U.S. 105 (1967) in reaching its conclusion that "the relationship between a State and its political subdivisions strikes near the heart of State sovereignty." … League v.

Opinion No. (2010)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 17, 2010

See Sheldon v. Grand River Dam Auth. , 76 P.2d 355 , 361 (Okla. 1938); City of Tulsa v. Dabney , 270 P. 1112 , 1114 (Okla. 1928); Faught v. City of Sapulpa , 292 P. 15 , 19 (Okla. 1929); Bd. of County Comm'rs v. … Williamson v. Garrison , 348 P.2d 859 , 863 (Okla. 1959).

Opinion No. (1988) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 9, 1988

Oklahoma City v. Century Indemnity Co., 62 P.2d 94, 97 (Okl. 1936). See also, State v. Euans, 319 P.2d 1112 (Okl. 1957); Moore v. Panish, 652 P.2d 32 (Cal. 1982). … See Mahan v. Agee, 652 P.2d 765 (Okl. 1982); Board of Regents of the Uniuersity of Oklahoma v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, 561 P.2d 499 (Okl. 1977); Oklahorna Association of Insurance Agents v.

Opinion No. (1994)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 8, 1994

See, e.g., Lewis v. Tulsa County Excise Bd., 198 P.2d 649 , 651 (Okla. 1948); McMahan v. Board of Education of Oklahoma City, 285 P. 953 , 954 (Okla. 1930). … See, also, Texas Empire Pipe Line Co. v. Excise Board of Nowata County, 24 P.2d 988 , 991 (Okla. 1933).

Opinion No. 92-505 (1992)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 13, 1992

IN 1971, IN LEMON V. … THUS, ANY DECISION IN THIS AREA BY A SCHOOL BOARD SHOULD BE MADE IN LIGHT OF THE LEMON V. KURTZMAN, 403 U.S. 602 (1971) AND IN CLOSE CONSULTATION WITH THE SCHOOL BOARD'S COUNSEL. (NEAL LEADER)

Opinion No. 76-103 (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 23, 1976

As you are aware, at the time of the opinion request there was pending in the United States Supreme Court the case of Virginia State Board of Pharmacy, et al. v. … -C.I.O., et al. v. Derryberry, et al., No. 74-592-E, directly attacking the constitutionality of 59 O.S. 736 .1 [ 59-736.1 ] (1971).

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 24, 1984

RETAINED IN THE STATEWIDE WATER DEVELOPMENT REVOLVING FUND. 82 O.S. 1085 .40 [ 82-1085.40 ](C) (C) IF MONIES IN THIS FUND ARE PLEDGED AS SECURITY AND COLLATERAL FOR INVESTMENT CERTIFICATES ISSUED BY THE WATER RESOURCES BOARD … O.S. 1085 .31 [ 82-1085.31 ], 82 O.S. 1085 .39 [ 82-1085.39 ], 82 O.S. 1085 .40 [ 82-1085.40 ](B) 82 O.S. 1085 .33 [ 82-1085.33 ], 82 O.S. 1085 .32 [ 82-1085.32 ](3) ARTICLE X, SECTION 23, ARTICLE X, SECTION 14, ARTICLE V,

Opinion No. 73-261 (1973) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 17, 1973

McVicker v. Board of County Commissioners of County of Caddo, Okl., 442 P.2d 297 , 302 (1968). … State ex rel Church of the Nazarene v. Fogo, 82 Ohio App. 238 , 79 N.E.2d 1914 , 1915 (1947), aff'd 150 Ohio St. 45 , 79 N.E.2d 546 (1948).