Case law

Opinion No. (1989)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 14, 1989

MATTER OF INCOME TAX PROTEST OF ASHLAND EXPLORATION INC., 751 P.2D 1070 (OKLA. 1988), HESS V. EXCISE BOARD OF MCCURTAIN COUNTY, 698 P.2D 930 (OKLA. 1985) 25 O.S. 1 . … V. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF JACKSON, D.C. MISS. 301 F.SUPP. 1161, 1207 (1969).

Opinion No. 74-217 (1975) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 14, 1975

The Oklahoma Supreme Court has said in the case of State ex rel Hart v. … The Court cited as authority Oklahoma Operating Company v. State Dry Cleaners Board, 206 P.2d 295 (Okl.), Ex parte Woodruff, 90 Okl. Cr. 59 , 210 P.2d 191 ; Associated Industries v.

Opinion No. 71-148 (1971) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 12, 1971

In the case of Hazen, et al. v. … In the case of City of Cushing v.

Opinion No. 70-321 (1970) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 9, 1970

In Christian v. … syllabus: "Despite requirement of Business Corporation Act that a corporation have at least three directors, under the Oklahoma Professional Corporation Act, a professional corporation with only two physician members on its board

Opinion No. 76-291 (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 31, 1976

3602 [ 74-3602 ] [ 74-3602 ], and 74 O.S. 3603 [ 74-3603 ] (1975)); limiting number of employees for certain agencies and support funds and defining employee; requiring certain reports; creating a State Employment Review Board … The general rule regarding Article V, Section 57, was declared in Turner v.

Opinion No. 90-535 (1990)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 24, 1990

SUBLETT V. CITY OF TULSA, 405 P. 2D 185 (OKLA. 1965). … LACY V. JACKSON, 682 P. 2D 218, 220 (OKLA. 1983).

Opinion No. (1985)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 26, 1985

In Pharmaceutical Society of the State of New York, Inc. v. … In Blue Cross of Maryland, Inc. v.

Opinion No. (2007)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 30, 2007

Kerr v. Grand River Dam Auth. , 154 P.2d 946 , 950 (Okla. 1945). … However, this is a decision for the GRDA Board to make, based on applicable law and all applicable facts and circumstances. 5 See id. (unregulated ice house); Hargrave v. Canadian Valley Elect.

Opinion No. (1979) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 28, 1979

McVicker v. Board of County Commissioners of Caddo County, Okla., 442 P.2d 297 (1968).

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 5, 1981

LIQUOR ORDERED BY THE HOLDER OF AN OKLAHOMA WHOLESALER'S LICENSE, WHEN SUCH GOODS ARE SHIPPED TO A DESTINATION OUTSIDE THE BORDERS OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. (4) THE JURISDICTION OF THE OKLAHOMA ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL BOARD … CITE: 37 O.S. 1971 533 [ 37-533 ] OPINION NO. 76-110, 37 O.S. 1971 524 [ 37-524 ], 37 O.S. 1971 521 [ 37-521 ](E), 37 O.S. 1971 536.1 [ 37-536.1 ], 27 U.S.C.A. 201 , 37 O.S. 1971 301 [37-301], OPINION NO. 77-267 (KERMIT V.

Opinion No. 76-199 (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 28, 1976

McVicker v. Board of County Commissioners of Caddo County, Okl., 442 P.2d 297 (1968). … Firemen's Relief and Pension Board v.

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 23, 1982

THE POWER TO AMEND THE TRUST IN THE INSTRUMENT CREATING THE TRUST MAY NOT RATIFY AN UNAUTHORIZED ACTION OF THE TRUSTEES BY AMENDING THE INSTRUMENT OF CREATION AFTER THE UNAUTHORIZED ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN. (4) WHETHER THE BOARD … (CITIES AND TOWNS, CORPORATIONS, PROPERTY, REVENUE BONDS, HOUSING, CAPITAL TO SAVINGS AND LOAN INSTITUTIONS, FINANCING, AUTHORITY, JURISDICTION, FUNCTION, CONSTRUCTION) CITE: ARTICLE V, SECTION 36, 11 O.S. 38 -109 [ 11-38

Question Submitted by: The Honorable Mark McBride, Oklahoma House of Representatives, District 53

2023 OK AG 3 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 4, 2023

Deputy Sheriff's Fraternal Ord. of Police, Lodge Number 188 v. Board of Cnty. … F.O.P., Lodge No. 188 v. Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa Co. Discussed at Length 2022 OK 79, 518 P.3d 531, WESTERN HEIGHTS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT v.

Opinion No. 68-314 (1968) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 14, 1968

Beta Theta Pi Corp. v. Board of County Commissioners, Cleveland County, 108 Okl. 78 , 234 P. 354 . … In the case of Board of Equalization v.

Opinion No. 75-151 (1975) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 14, 1975

or commission of any agency, board, authority or commission of the State of Oklahoma unless such member is a full-time salaried employee; provided, however, that said Oklahoma Employment Security Commission and any state … impairing the obligation of contracts, shall ever be passed . . . . " The constitutional inhibitions against impairment of contract are applicable to contracts of state as fully as to those between individuals, Fortinberry Co. v.

Opinion No. (1987) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 26, 1987

IN BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF COMANCHE COUNTY V.

Opinion No. (1998)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 29, 1998

Nevertheless, the power of the Legislature to make laws may be delegated to administrative boards or officials to the extent of making rules and regulations, subject to certain limitations. Oliver v. … Democratic Party of Oklahoma v.

Opinion No. 71-250 (1971) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 28, 1971

The Secretary of the State Election Board shall be secretary of the Senate and draw the salary and be allowed assistance as provided by law." … State Board of Dental Examiners v. Pollock, 125 Okl. 170 , 256 P. 927 ."

Opinion No. (1994)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 22, 1994

Clifton v. Clifton, 801 P.2d 693 (Okla. 1990). … See e.g., 68 O.S. 2864 (1991) (establishing the membership of the Board of Equalization). See also Shell Pipe Line Co. v.

Opinion No. 72-103 (1972) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 7, 1972

Included within the title of said House Bill is (1) making declaration of intent, (3) providing for apportionment and disbursement of funds by State Board of Education, (4) prescribing purpose of funds, etc. … 57 Oklahoma Constitution, is to forbid the Legislature from embracing in any one act, two or more unconnected subjects, Chastain v.