Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,251 results
0.38s
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 18, 1979
In the case of Rountree v. … See also Consolidated School District No. 6 v. Panther Oil Grease Mfg.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 24, 1980
Pawnee County Excise Board v. Kurn, 187 Okl. 110 , 101 P.2d 614 (1940); Wimberly v. … Bryan v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 27, 2002
City of Chickasha v. … DREW EDMONDSON Attorney General of Oklahoma DOROTHY BROWN Assistant Attorney General 1 Your request for a legal opinion does not specify the type of insurance coverage to be purchased by a municipality.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 1, 1987
LEGISLATORS — STATE BANK ** (1) THE FACT THAT MONEYS, APPROPRIATED BY THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA TO AN ENTITY OF STATE GOVERNMENT, ARE DEPOSITED WITHIN AN OKLAHOMA BANK, DOES 'NOT' REPRESENT A CONFLICT OF INTEREST UNDER ARTICLE V … , SECTION 23 OF THE OKLAHOMA CONSTITUTION WHERE THE MONEYS ARE DEPOSITED IN THE BANK BY THE STATE TREASURER AND/OR THE STATE DEPOSITORY BOARD PURSUANT TO 62 O.S. 71 [ 62-71 ] AND NEITHER THE LEGISLATURE NOR THE ENTITY OF
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 26, 1987
PURSUANT TO ARTICLE V , SECTION 23 OF THE OKLAHOMA CONSTITUTION, A MEMBER OF THE LEGISLATURE MAY NOT BE INTERESTED EITHER DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY IN ANY CONTRACT WITH THE STATE, COUNTY OR OTHER SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE. … AS STATED IN BASKIN V. STATE, 107 OKL. 272, 232 P. 388 , 390 (1925) AND REAFFIRMED IN STATE EX REL. SETTLES V. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF DEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 4, 1987
THIS QUESTION WAS ANSWERED IN THE AFFIRMATIVE BY THE OKLAHOMA SUPREME COURT IN BERRY V. … BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE REGISTERED DENTISTS OF OKLAHOMA, 611 P.2d 628 (OKL. 1980) WHEREIN THE COURT HELD THAT THE RULE PERMITTING EXECUTIVE SESSIONS DOES NOT ABROGATE THE REQUIREMENT OF THE OPEN MEETING ACT THAT MINUTES
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 26, 1991
KEDBETTER V. OKLAHOMA ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LAWS ENFORCEMENT COMMISSION, 764 P.2D 172 (OKLA. 1988). … AND RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE STATE BOARD OF HEALTH PERTAINING TO PUBLIC HEALTH. SUBJECT TO ADMINISTRATIVE SUPERVISION OF THE STATE COMMISSIONER OF HEAL K.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 19, 1999
City of Chandler v. State ex rel. Dept. of Human Services, 839 P.2d 1352 , 1354 (Okla. 1992). … See Jackson v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 13, 1968
Article V , Section 58 of the Constitution of Oklahoma was applied to a subdivision of the state and in regard to tax deeds in the case of Harris et al v. … Marland, Governor v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 23, 1963
SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE WHO SERVES A JUDICIAL DISTRICT HAVING A NET ASSESSED VALUATION IN EXCESS OF $150,000,000.00, NOT INCLUDING INTANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY AND LESS APPROVED HOMESTEAD EXEMPTIONS AS CERTIFIED TO THE EXCISE BOARDS … $14,500.00 PER ANNUM MONTHLY BY THE STATE, BEGINNING WITH THEIR NEW TERMS, JANUARY 14, 1963 CITE: 74 O.S. 1961 287 [ 74-287 ], 74 O.S. 1961 289 [ 74-289 ], 20 O.S. 1961 141.1 [ 20-141.1 ], 19 O.S. 1961 6 [ 19-6 ](A)/ ARTICLE V,
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 29, 1987
AS HAS BEEN THE POLICY OF PAST ADMINISTRATIONS, THIS OFFICE IS UNABLE TO ISSUE OFFICIAL OPINIONS REGARDING PROPOSED LEGISLATION, OR, IN THIS CASE, PROPOSED RULES OF A STATE BOARD, AGENCY OR COMMISSION. … THOMPSON V. EKBERG, 613 P.2d 466 (OKL. 1982), HOLDING THAT GRANT OF AUTHORITY TO A STATE AGENCY IS SPECIFICALLY SUBJECT TO LIMITATIONS OTHERWISE PROVIDED BY LAW. (SUSAN BRIMER LOVING)
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 25, 1968
with enforcing the laws relating to public peace and safety: the county sheriff, the county treasurer, the county clerk, the court clerk, the clerk of the court of common pleas, the county assessor, and the members of the board … See also Shriver v. Graham, Okla., 356 P.2d 774 . Senate Bill No. 343 has as its stated purpose that of fixing salary of different county officers.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 24, 1986
See, e.g., Salada Beach Public Utility Dist. v. Anderson , 123 P.2d 86 (Cal.App. 1942). … Jackson v. Independent School Dist. No. 16 , 648 P.2d 26 , 29 (Okla. 1982).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 7, 1972
State ex rel Brown v. Dunnaway, 207 Okl. 144 , 248 P.2d 232 (1952). … In the case of Blackledge v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 29, 2001
Murray v. … Id. at 476 (emphasis added). ¶ 6 In Draper v. State Board of Equalization, 414 P.2d 276 , 279 (Okla. 1966), a special fund was defined to include only those funds supported by direct taxes, fees, or other revenue.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 20, 1991
MAYBURY V. COYNE, 312 S.W.2D 455 (RY. 1958); SEE ALSO UNITED STATES V. TELLER, 107 U.S. 64 , 2 S.CT. 39 , 27 L.ED 352 (1883). … V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 30, 2004
Id. ; Blitz, 75 P.3d 888 ; Johnson v. … City of Duncan v. Bingham, 394 P.2d 456 , 460 (Okla. 1964).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 30, 1991
SEE, GILMORE V. CITY OF MONTGOMERY, 417 U.S. 556 , 94 S.CT. 2416 , 41 L.ED.2D 304, 319 (1974). THIS "STATE ACTION" REFLECTS EXTENSIVE INVOLVEMENT IN A QUESTIONED ACTIVITY BY A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY. … THESE UNDERWRITING GUIDELINES ARE NOT REGULATED BY THE OKLAHOMA PROPERTY AND CASUALTY BOARD, THUS GIVING MORE CREDENCE TO THE IDEA THAT THERE EXISTS NO STATE INVOLVEMENT IN AN INSURANCE COMPANY'S DENIAL OF COVERAGE.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 31, 1977
Grimes v. … Board of Education of Oklahoma, 186 Okl. 665 , 99 P.2d 876 (1940), but was modified to the extent that the funds received from such a sale had to be properly appropriated by the county excise board before they could be used
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 24, 1979
(Emphasis added) State ex rel., Oklahoma Bar Association v. … Bancroft v. Board of Governors, Okla., 210 P.2d 666 (1949), held: ". . . as a general rule, all crimes of which fraud is an element are looked on as involving moral turpitude . . ." Page 668.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna