Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersoklaag

2,251 results

0.38s

  • Opinion No. (1979) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 18, 1979

    In the case of Rountree v. … See also Consolidated School District No. 6 v. Panther Oil Grease Mfg.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 80-150 (1980) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 24, 1980

    Pawnee County Excise Board v. Kurn, 187 Okl. 110 , 101 P.2d 614 (1940); Wimberly v. … Bryan v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2002)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 27, 2002

    City of Chickasha v. … DREW EDMONDSON Attorney General of Oklahoma DOROTHY BROWN Assistant Attorney General 1 Your request for a legal opinion does not specify the type of insurance coverage to be purchased by a municipality.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 1, 1987

    LEGISLATORS — STATE BANK ** (1) THE FACT THAT MONEYS, APPROPRIATED BY THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA TO AN ENTITY OF STATE GOVERNMENT, ARE DEPOSITED WITHIN AN OKLAHOMA BANK, DOES 'NOT' REPRESENT A CONFLICT OF INTEREST UNDER ARTICLE V … , SECTION 23 OF THE OKLAHOMA CONSTITUTION WHERE THE MONEYS ARE DEPOSITED IN THE BANK BY THE STATE TREASURER AND/OR THE STATE DEPOSITORY BOARD PURSUANT TO 62 O.S. 71 [ 62-71 ] AND NEITHER THE LEGISLATURE NOR THE ENTITY OF

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1987) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 26, 1987

    PURSUANT TO ARTICLE V , SECTION 23 OF THE OKLAHOMA CONSTITUTION, A MEMBER OF THE LEGISLATURE MAY NOT BE INTERESTED EITHER DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY IN ANY CONTRACT WITH THE STATE, COUNTY OR OTHER SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE. … AS STATED IN BASKIN V. STATE, 107 OKL. 272, 232 P. 388 , 390 (1925) AND REAFFIRMED IN STATE EX REL. SETTLES V. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF DEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1987) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 4, 1987

    THIS QUESTION WAS ANSWERED IN THE AFFIRMATIVE BY THE OKLAHOMA SUPREME COURT IN BERRY V. … BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE REGISTERED DENTISTS OF OKLAHOMA, 611 P.2d 628 (OKL. 1980) WHEREIN THE COURT HELD THAT THE RULE PERMITTING EXECUTIVE SESSIONS DOES NOT ABROGATE THE REQUIREMENT OF THE OPEN MEETING ACT THAT MINUTES

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1991) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 26, 1991

    KEDBETTER V. OKLAHOMA ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LAWS ENFORCEMENT COMMISSION, 764 P.2D 172 (OKLA. 1988). … AND RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE STATE BOARD OF HEALTH PERTAINING TO PUBLIC HEALTH. SUBJECT TO ADMINISTRATIVE SUPERVISION OF THE STATE COMMISSIONER OF HEAL K.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1999)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 19, 1999

    City of Chandler v. State ex rel. Dept. of Human Services, 839 P.2d 1352 , 1354 (Okla. 1992). … See Jackson v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 68-219 (1968) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 13, 1968

    Article V , Section 58 of the Constitution of Oklahoma was applied to a subdivision of the state and in regard to tax deeds in the case of Harris et al v. … Marland, Governor v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 23, 1963

    SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE WHO SERVES A JUDICIAL DISTRICT HAVING A NET ASSESSED VALUATION IN EXCESS OF $150,000,000.00, NOT INCLUDING INTANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY AND LESS APPROVED HOMESTEAD EXEMPTIONS AS CERTIFIED TO THE EXCISE BOARDS … $14,500.00 PER ANNUM MONTHLY BY THE STATE, BEGINNING WITH THEIR NEW TERMS, JANUARY 14, 1963 CITE: 74 O.S. 1961 287 [ 74-287 ], 74 O.S. 1961 289 [ 74-289 ], 20 O.S. 1961 141.1 [ 20-141.1 ], 19 O.S. 1961 6 [ 19-6 ](A)/ ARTICLE V,

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1987) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 29, 1987

    AS HAS BEEN THE POLICY OF PAST ADMINISTRATIONS, THIS OFFICE IS UNABLE TO ISSUE OFFICIAL OPINIONS REGARDING PROPOSED LEGISLATION, OR, IN THIS CASE, PROPOSED RULES OF A STATE BOARD, AGENCY OR COMMISSION. … THOMPSON V. EKBERG, 613 P.2d 466 (OKL. 1982), HOLDING THAT GRANT OF AUTHORITY TO A STATE AGENCY IS SPECIFICALLY SUBJECT TO LIMITATIONS OTHERWISE PROVIDED BY LAW. (SUSAN BRIMER LOVING)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 68-242 (1968) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 25, 1968

    with enforcing the laws relating to public peace and safety: the county sheriff, the county treasurer, the county clerk, the court clerk, the clerk of the court of common pleas, the county assessor, and the members of the board … See also Shriver v. Graham, Okla., 356 P.2d 774 . Senate Bill No. 343 has as its stated purpose that of fixing salary of different county officers.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1986)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 24, 1986

    See, e.g., Salada Beach Public Utility Dist. v. Anderson , 123 P.2d 86 (Cal.App. 1942). … Jackson v. Independent School Dist. No. 16 , 648 P.2d 26 , 29 (Okla. 1982).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 72-112 (1972) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 7, 1972

    State ex rel Brown v. Dunnaway, 207 Okl. 144 , 248 P.2d 232 (1952). … In the case of Blackledge v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2001)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 29, 2001

    Murray v. … Id. at 476 (emphasis added). ¶ 6 In Draper v. State Board of Equalization, 414 P.2d 276 , 279 (Okla. 1966), a special fund was defined to include only those funds supported by direct taxes, fees, or other revenue.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1991) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 20, 1991

    MAYBURY V. COYNE, 312 S.W.2D 455 (RY. 1958); SEE ALSO UNITED STATES V. TELLER, 107 U.S. 64 , 2 S.CT. 39 , 27 L.ED 352 (1883). … V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2004)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 30, 2004

    Id. ; Blitz, 75 P.3d 888 ; Johnson v. … City of Duncan v. Bingham, 394 P.2d 456 , 460 (Okla. 1964).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1991) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 30, 1991

    SEE, GILMORE V. CITY OF MONTGOMERY, 417 U.S. 556 , 94 S.CT. 2416 , 41 L.ED.2D 304, 319 (1974). THIS "STATE ACTION" REFLECTS EXTENSIVE INVOLVEMENT IN A QUESTIONED ACTIVITY BY A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY. … THESE UNDERWRITING GUIDELINES ARE NOT REGULATED BY THE OKLAHOMA PROPERTY AND CASUALTY BOARD, THUS GIVING MORE CREDENCE TO THE IDEA THAT THERE EXISTS NO STATE INVOLVEMENT IN AN INSURANCE COMPANY'S DENIAL OF COVERAGE.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 77-148 (1977) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 31, 1977

    Grimes v. … Board of Education of Oklahoma, 186 Okl. 665 , 99 P.2d 876 (1940), but was modified to the extent that the funds received from such a sale had to be properly appropriated by the county excise board before they could be used

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1979)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 24, 1979

    (Emphasis added) State ex rel., Oklahoma Bar Association v. … Bancroft v. Board of Governors, Okla., 210 P.2d 666 (1949), held: ". . . as a general rule, all crimes of which fraud is an element are looked on as involving moral turpitude . . ." Page 668.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.