Case law

Question Submitted by: The Honorable Chris Kannady, Oklahoma House of Representatives, District 91

2024 OK AG 10 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 12, 2024

Brown v. City of Warr Acres , 1997 OK 117, ¶ 17, 946 P.2d 1140, 1144. … Brown, 1997 OK 117, ¶ 17, 946 P.2d at 1144 (quoting, in part, Dixon v. Shaw , 1927 OK 24, ¶ 5, 253 P.500, 501).

Opinion No. (2011)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 13, 2011

Jackson v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 16 , 648 P.2d 26 , 29 (Okla. 1982). Moreover, legislative intent must be determined from the entire act. In re Blain , 172 P.2d 795 , 799 (Okla. 1946). … Boards), between a non state agency board and a state agency (the Eastern Red Cedar Registry Board and the Board of Agriculture) and between two state agencies (the Pet Breeders Board and the Veterinary Board).

Opinion No. 76-354 (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 18, 1976

for the Board to take action pursuant to Article V , Section 21 of the Oklahoma Constitution, and the Board is without the authority to specify a greater number of votes to be required for the Board to take action. … A majority vote of a quorum of the Board on Legislative Compensation is required for the Board to take action pursuant to Article V , Section 21 of the Oklahoma Constitution, and the Board is without the authority to specify

Opinion No. 11-15 (2011)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 27, 2011

The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals has specifically held that the Pardon and Parole Board's recommendation is advisory only and not binding on the Governor. Jerry, Jr. v. … In Wright v. Page , 414 P.2d 570 , 573 (Okla. Crim.

Opinion No. (2009)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 31, 2009

board." … V , § 36 ; Okla. Const. art. VII-B , §§ 3 , 4 ; Oliver v. Okla. Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd. , 359 P.2d 183 , 185 (Okla. 1961); Spearman v. Williams , 415 P.2d 597 , 600 (Okla. 1966); Bd. of Regents v.

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 18, 1976

TO ARTICLE V , SECTION 21 OKLAHOMA CONSTITUTION AND THE BOARD IS WITHOUT THE AUTHORITY TO SPECIFY A GREATER NUMBER OF VOTES TO BE REQUIRED FOR THE BOARD TO TAKE ACTION. … THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD CAN CALL A CERTAIN NUMBER OF MEETINGS TO BE HELD BEFORE A FINAL VOTE IS TAKEN ON THE MATTER OF LEGISLATIVE COMPENSATION, ARTICLE V, SECTION 21 RELATING TO THE BOARD IS SELF EXECUTING PROVISION OF

Opinion No. (2001)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 5, 2001

Summey v. … .; see also Excise Bd. v. Sch. Dist.

Opinion No. (2011)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 27, 2011

The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals has specifically held that the Pardon and Parole Board's recommendation is advisory only and not binding on the Governor. Jerry, Jr. v. … In Wright v. Page , 414 P.2d 570 , 573 (Okla. Crim. App. 1966), the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals specifically held that the Pardon and Parole Board cannot grant a parole on its own action.

Opinion No. (2006)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 28, 2006

Nixon v. Roberts, 420 P.2d 898 , 903 (Okla. 1966); see McConnell v. … Nixon v. Roberts, 420 P.2d 898 , 903 (Okla. 1966); Heisler v. Thomas, 651 P.2d 1330 , 1331 (Okla. 1982). 3.

Opinion No. (2010)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 29, 2010

Menefee v. Askew , 107 P. 159 , 162(Okla. 1910). … Draper v.

Opinion No. (2007)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 12, 2007

V. … Id .; Marley v. Cannon , 618 P.2d 401 , 405 (Okla. 1980).

Opinion No. (1992)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 30, 1992

JACKSON V. INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 16, 648 P.2D 26, 29 (OKLA. 1982). … CAVE SPRINGS PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT I-30 V. BLAIR, 613 P.2D 1046 (OKLA. 1980).

Opinion No. (2000)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 4, 2000

See Sharp v. … See Nauni v.

Opinion No. (1990)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 8, 1990

ROTRAMEL V. PUBLIC SERVICE CO., 546 P.2D 1015, 1017 (OKLA. 1975). TEXAS OKLAHOMA EXPRESS V. SORENSON, 652 P.2D 285, 257 (OKLA. 1982) (DICTA). … SEE, MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY V. KING, 381 P.2D 153 (OKLA. 1963).

Opinion No. 80-032 (1980) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 1, 1980

As the Court noted in Oklahoma County Excise Board v. … Board of Education v.

Opinion No. (1998)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 18, 1998

McVicker v. Board of County Commissioners of Caddo County, 442 P.2d 297,302 (Okla. 1968) (citation omitted). … Oklahoma State Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision v. Migliaccio, 917 P.2d 483 , 486 (Okla.Ct.App. 1996), citing Marley v.

Opinion No. (2004)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 12, 2004

City of Sand Springs v. Dep't of Pub. … v.

Opinion No. (2005)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 8, 2005

See Woodward v. … See Richey Manor, Inc. v. Schweiker, 684 F.2d 130 , 135 (D.C.

Opinion No. (2003)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 18, 2003

Jackson v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 16, 648 P.2d 26 , 29 (Okla. 1982). Legislative intent is ascertained from reading the whole Act, "in the light of the general purpose and object." City of Midwest City v. … AMF Tubescope Co. v.

Opinion No. 72-231 (1972) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 28, 1972

Potter v. LaMunyon, 389 F.2d 874 (10th Cir. 1968); Mills v. Smith, Okl., 355 P.2d 1064 , 82 A.L.R.2d 1144 (1960). … Article V, Section 11, Article V, Section 15, Article V, Section 19, Okl. Const.