Case law

Opinion No. 70-299 (1970) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 30, 1970

Blankenship v. Atoka County, et al., Okl., 456 P.2d 537 (1969). … A landmark case construing this statute was Gibson v.

Opinion No. (1988)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 24, 1988

In State v. … See City of Duncan v. Bingham, supra; State ex rel. Caldwell v. Oldfield, supra.

Opinion No. 74-180 (1974) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 27, 1974

Barton v. Derryberry, 500 P.2d 281 (Okla. 1972); Drolte v. Board of County Commissioners of Ellis County, 56 P.2d 800 (Okla. 1936); Bass v. … Board of Commissioners of Muskogee County v. Hart, 119 P. 132 (Okla. 1911). It should be noted, however, that increases for deputies are not mandatory.

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 29, 1957

NON GERMANE DUTIES IMPOSED BY THIS ACT; PAYABLE FROM THE COURT FUND), IT WILL THEREUPON BECOME HIS DUTY TO WRITE ANY OPINION COMING WITHIN THE PURVIEW OF SECT. 2 THAT HE MAY BE THEREAFTER DULY REQUESTED BY THE GOVERNING BOARD … (WRITTEN OPINIONS, COMPOSE OPINIONS) CITE: 19 O.S. 179 .7 [ 19-179.7 ], ARTICLE V, SECTION 32, ARTICLE V, SECTION 46, ARTICLE V, SECTION 59 (FRED HANSEN)

Opinion No. (2001)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 5, 2001

Corp. v. … Advisory Bd. v.

Opinion No. (1993)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 2, 1993

SELECTED BY THE STATE TEXTBOOK COMMITTEE IN SUCH MANNER AS SHALL BE PRESCRIBED BY THE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION." … CITY OF DUNCAN V. BINGHAM, 394 P.2D 456, 460 (OKLA.1964).

Opinion No. 72-108 (1972) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 17, 1972

(Emphasis added) In the case of Excise Board of Washita County v. … In Grable v.

Opinion No. 80-066 (1980) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 30, 1980

City of Ardmore v. Excise Board of Carter County, 155 Okl. 126 , 8 P.2d 2 (1932); Board of Commissioners of Marshall County v. Shaw, 199 Okl. 66 , 182 P.2d 507 (1947).

Opinion No. 73-216 (1973) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 6, 1973

Special Indemnity Fund v. Harold, Okl., 398 P.2d 827 . … Garmen v. Myers, 183 Okl. 141 , 80 P.2d 624 ; Lane v. State Board for Registration of Professional Engineers, Okl., 468 P.2d 784 .

Opinion No. 80-089 (1980) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 8, 1980

See Gray v. Board of Education of Pawhuska Ind. Sch. Dist., Okl., 389 P.2d 498 (1964). … See Gray v. Board of Education of Pawhuska Ind. Sch. Dist., supra; see also 83 ALR 2d 516 .

Opinion No. 76-196 (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 21, 1976

In the recent Oklahoma decision of Pease, et al. v. … Hedges v. Groom, 194 Okl. 384 , 151 P.2d 936 1944 .) As further recognized in McVicker v.

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 17, 1973

OPINION — AG — ** OKLAHOMA INDUSTRIAL FINANCE AUTHORITY — LOANS ** THE OKLAHOMA INDUSTRIAL FINANCE AUTHORITY IS 'NOT' PROHIBITED BY ARTICLE V , SECTION 53 OF THE OKLAHOMA CONSTITUTION FROM RE NEGOTIATING ITS LOAN WITH OSAGE … COUNTY INDUSTRIAL AUTHORITY AND WHETHER THE LOAN SHOULD OR SHOULD 'NOT' BE RENEGOTIATED IS AN ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION TO BE MADE BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OKLAHOMA INDUSTRIAL AUTHORITY BASED UPON PRACTICAL BUSINESS

Opinion No. 57-0508

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 8, 1957

— IT WOULD BE UNCONSTITUTIONAL (COMMITTEE TO: CHECK INVOICES, CHECK INVENTORIES, MAINTENANCE, EXPENDITURES PRACTICES, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, SALARIES, OFFICE SPACE, RECORDS) CITE: ARTICLE V, SECTION 46, ARTICLE V,

Opinion No. (1997)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 18, 1997

Safeway Stores v. … Supp. 1996, §§ 353-366[59-353-366], gives the State Board of Pharmacy certain responsibilities in the regulation of the sale of drugs; however, as seen by the absence of price regulation in the Pharmacy Board's rules, the

Opinion No. 77-106 (1977) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 27, 1977

City of Tulsa v. Mayes, 174 Okl. 286 , 51 P.2d 266 (1935); Sublett v. City of Tulsa, 405 P.2d 185 (Okl. 1965). … Board of County Commissioners v. Warrarn, 285 P.2d 1034 (Okl. 1955), dealt with "the validity of a trust instrument and the powers, duties, and liabilities thereunder."

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 8, 1952

— NEGATIVE, QUESTION(2): DOES THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS HAVE AUTHORITY TO EXPEND COUNTY FUNDS FOR THE REIMBURSEMENT OF THE OWNER AND OPERATOR OF THE INJURED VEHICLE ? … . ** NOTE: THIS IS OVERRULED BY ' TERRY V. EDGIN (1979) . . . 598 P.2d 2281 ** (TORT, LIABILITY, CONTRACT) CITE: 19 O.S. 1 [ 19-1 ], 19 O.S. 339 [ 19-339 ] (JAMES P. GARRETT)

Opinion No. (1994)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 9, 1994

MCDONALD V DUCKWORTH, 173 P.2D 436 (OKLA.1946). … TWA V. MCKINLEY, 749 P.2D 108 (OKLA. 1988).

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 13, 1975

106 P.2d 549 (1910), THE LEGISLATURE, IN THE ABSENCE OF A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT, WOULD BE WITHOUT AUTHORITY TO PRESCRIBE A SPECIFIC PERIOD OF TIME "AFTER CONVICTION" FOR A CRIMINAL OFFENSE, DURING THE PARDON AND PAROLE BOARD … CITE: SECTION 36, ARTICLE V; 57 O.S. 1971 332.7 [ 57-332.7 ](GERALD E. WEIS) ** ARTICLE VI, SECTION 10 ARTICLE VI, SECTION 36

Opinion No. 71-169 (1971) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 4, 1971

Oklahoma County Excise Board, 193 Okl. 130 , 141 P.2d 281 (1943). … Co., v. Choctaw County Excise Board, 48 P.2d 312 (Okl. 1935). It is, therefore, the opinion of the Attorney General that Question 1 be answered in the negative.

Opinion No. 76-384 (1977) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 10, 1977

Local school boards have the statutory authority to enter into employment contracts with teachers and therein provide, within such limitations as may be imposed by law, for the compensation to be paid. … Anderson v. Miller, 172 Okl. 480 , 45 P.2d 499 (1934); Smith v. School District No. 1, Marshall County, 187 Okl. 184 , 102 P.2d 131 (1940).