Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,251 results
3.34s
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 3, 1995
Ledbetter v. … See City of Duncan v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 6, 1980
PERCIVAL) ** SEE: COURT OF APPEALS DECISION NO. 86,759 (1996) CITY OF BIXBY V. STATE OF OKLAHOMA EX REL. … Percival) ** See: Court of Appeals Decision No. 86,759 (1996) — City of Bixby v. State of Oklahoma ex rel. Department of Labor **
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 20, 1994
Oliver v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, 359 P.2d 183 , 189 (Okla. 1961). Charging a processing fee would, in effect, extend the Commission's power beyond those granted in the Oklahoma Wheat Resources Act. … "It is a generally accepted rule . . . that boards created by statute may only exercise the power granted by statute" and their authority to make rules for their various procedures do not include the "authority to make rules
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 20, 1976
This constitutional language prohibits the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board from issuing a wholesale license or package store license to a corporation wherein the incorporators, the corporate officers and the directors are … McVicker v. Board of County Commissioners of Caddo County, Okl., 442 P.2d 297 (1968); In re Guardianship of Campbell, Okl., 450 P.2d 203 (1966).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 27, 1990
) MAY CONTINUE TO COLLECT MONEY FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE UNITED STATES IN CONNECTION WITH FEDERAL PROJECTS IF AUTHORIZED AS FISCAL AGENT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THAT PURPOSE. 82 O.S. 277 .6(16) (1981) PROVIDES THAT THE BOARD … V. MARTIN, 44 P. 2D 72 (OKLA. 1935); TRAP V. ELLS FARGO EXPRESS CO., 97 P. 1003 (OKLA. 1908). THE PRESUMPTION IS THAT BOTH STATUTES ARE INTENDED TO OPERATE. ID.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 7, 1972
In the case of Cummings v. … (Emphasis added) The above quoted language from the case of Cummings v. Board of Education, supra, would seem to be determinative of your question.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 27, 2005
Leasing, Inc. v. State ex rel. State Bd. of Pub. Affairs, 737 P.2d 1191 , 1195 (Okla. 1987)) (emphasis added). … Nat'l Bank v. State ex rel.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 23, 1989
proposed by a resolution of the governing body, the notice required under 11 O.S. 13 -11 (2) is spelled out in 11 O.S. 13 -106 which provides as follows: Within twenty (20) days after receipt of the proposed charter from the board … Hess v. Excise Board of McCurtain County, 698 P.2d 930 (Okla. 1985). Where the meaning of the statute is clear and unambiguous there is no room for further construction to determine legislative intent Fuller v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 2, 1985
Oklahoma v. United States Civil Serv. Com ., 330 U.S. 127 , 91 L.Ed. 794 , 67 S.Ct. 544 (1947); King v. Smith , 392 U.S. 309 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1118 , 88 S.Ct. 2128 (1968); Pennhurst State School v. … In Ivanhoe Irrigation District v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 27, 1974
In Sparks v. … See also 53 A.L.R. 595 , 93 A.L.R. 333 , Annotations; 42 Am.Jur. 880; Farley v. Board of Education of City of Perry, 62 Okl. 181 , 162 P. 797 ."
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 24, 1976
Firemen's Relief and Pension Board v. Ozment, 467 P.2d 502 (1970). … City of Bethany v. Hill, 509 P.2d 1364 (1973); Seventeen Hundred Peoria, Inc. v. City of Tulsa, 422 P.2d 840 (1966).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 21, 2005
McNeill v. … City of Duncan v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 17, 1980
A cardinal rule is that public officers, boards, and commissions, created by statute, "have only such authority as is conferred upon them by law." Tulsa Exposition and Fair Corp. v. … Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County, Okl., 468 P.2d 501 (1970); Shaw v. Grumbine, 137 Okl. 95 , 278 P. 311 (1929).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 4, 1993
V. BANKING BOARD, 704 P.2D 490 (OKLA.1985). … IN MULVEY V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 22, 1972
District Unemployment Compensation Board, 435 F.2d 433 (D.C. Cir. 1970). … "In M'Culloch v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 27, 1989
IN BETTS V. COMMISSIONERS OF THE LAND OFFICE, 110 P. 766 (OKLA. 1910), THE OKLAHOMA SUPREME COURT SETTLED HE CONTROVERSY. … THE LEGISLATURE'S APPROVAL SPECIFIES THAT THE RETURN TO THE COMMISSION SHALL BE PURSUANT TO AN AGREEMENT ENTERED INTO BY THE COMMISSIONERS AND THE BOARD OF REGENTS.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 11, 1977
In addition, see Kansas City Southern Railway Company v. City of Heavner, 175 Okl. Cr. 517 , 175 P. 517 ; In re Menefee, 220 Okl. 363 , 97 P. 1014 ; State ex rel Board of Education v. … Board of Education, 161 Okl. 287 , 18 P.2d 863 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 1, 1980
Title 85 O.S. 131 [ 85-131 ](a) (1979), creates the "Board of Managers of the State Insurance Fund." … Section 85 O.S. 131 [ 85-131 ](b) directs the Board of Managers to appoint a State Insurance Fund Commissioner, who shall be executive manager of the Fund. The legal status of the Fund is set forth in Moran et al v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 18, 1990
TESTA V. KATT, 67 S.CT. 810 , 330 U.S. 386 , 91 L.ED. 967 (1947). A STATE LAW WHICH CONFLICTS WITH THE EXERCISE OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT'S POWER MUST ALWAYS YIELD. FREE V. … IN LAWRENCE COUNTY V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 18, 1979
In Rountree v. … In the case Johnston v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna