Case law

Opinion No. 79-035 (1979) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 28, 1979

Tate v. … Watson v. Lee, 163 A.L.R. 362, 370 ; Franklin v. Savannah, 199 Ga. 426 , 34 S.E.2d 506 (1945); Hughes v. Traeger, 264 Ill. 612 , 106 N.E. 431 (1914). In Krebs v.

Opinion No. 76-270 (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 9, 1976

See Perry v. Carter, 173 Okl. 267 , 48 P.2d 278 ; Protest of Downing et al., 164 Okl. 181 , 23 P.2d 173 . . . ." … (Patterson v. State, 7 Okl. Cr. 497 , 124 P. 942 ).

Opinion No. (1994)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 20, 1994

Oliver v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, 359 P.2d 183 , 189 (Okla. 1961). Charging a processing fee would, in effect, extend the Commission's power beyond those granted in the Oklahoma Wheat Resources Act. … "It is a generally accepted rule . . . that boards created by statute may only exercise the power granted by statute" and their authority to make rules for their various procedures do not include the "authority to make rules

Opinion No. 73-185 (1973) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 18, 1973

In the case of Smith v. … In the body of the opinion in the case of State ex rel Hamilton v.

Opinion No. (1989)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 23, 1989

proposed by a resolution of the governing body, the notice required under 11 O.S. 13 -11 (2) is spelled out in 11 O.S. 13 -106 which provides as follows: Within twenty (20) days after receipt of the proposed charter from the board … Hess v. Excise Board of McCurtain County, 698 P.2d 930 (Okla. 1985). Where the meaning of the statute is clear and unambiguous there is no room for further construction to determine legislative intent Fuller v.

Opinion No. (1979) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 4, 1979

Hudson v. Carter, 167 Okl. 32 , 27 P.2d 617 , 91 A.L.R. 1497 (1934), the Supreme Court of Oklahoma stated that Article V, Section 56, is "positive and unambiguous." Ritchie v. … The provisions of Sections 12, 13, 16 and 17 have as their principal object the raising of revenue, Leveridge v.

Opinion No. (2005)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 21, 2005

McNeill v. … City of Duncan v.

Opinion No. 74-118 (1974) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 27, 1974

In Sparks v. … See also 53 A.L.R. 595 , 93 A.L.R. 333 , Annotations; 42 Am.Jur. 880; Farley v. Board of Education of City of Perry, 62 Okl. 181 , 162 P. 797 ."

Opinion No. (1989)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 12, 1989

WADE V. BROWN, 516 P.2D 526 (OKL.1973) QUOTING IN RE GUARDIANSHIP OF CAMPBELL, 450 P.2D 203 (OKL.1966). … SEE HOLBERT V. ECHEVERRIA, 744 P.2D 960, 965 (OKL. 1987); SEE ALSO MCCULLICK V. STATE, 682 P.2D 235, 236 (OKL.CR. 1984).

Opinion No. (1992)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 18, 1992

WOODY V. INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 141 OF POTTAWATOMIE COUNTY, 661 P.2D 892 (OKLA. 1983). WORDS USED IN THE STATUTE, UNLESS OTHERWISE DEFINED, ARE TO BE INTERPRETED IN THEIR ORDINARY SENSE. 25 O.S. 1991 , 1. … BOUTWELL V. STATE, 659 P.2D 322 (OKL. CR. 1983).

Opinion No. (1986)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 11, 1986

Board of Trustees of Firemen's Relief and Pension Fund of City of Tulsa v. Naughton , 173 P.2d 425 , 426 (Okla. 1946) (emphasis added). … Firemen's Relief and Pension Board v. Ozment , 467 P.2d 502 (Okla. 1970); Board of Trustees of Firemen's Relief and Pension Fund in and for City of Tulsa v. Naughton , 68 P.2d 845 (Okla. 1937).

Opinion No. 80-031 (1980) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 2, 1980

Tulsa Exposition and Fair Corp. v. Board of County Commissioners, 468 P.2d 501 , 507 , 508 (Okl. 1970), held: "Counties have only such authority as is granted by statute. Citing cases . . . … The Board of County Commissioners in exercising corporate powers is limited to those fields expressly assigned to such subdivisions of the state by the legislature. Citing cases . . .

Opinion No. (1989)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 10, 1989

CLOUD V. … OKLAHOMA ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL BOARD, 696 P. 2D 10 (OKL. APP. 1984), WHERE THE MAJORITY OPINION DEEMS THE SUPREME COURT TO HAVE MODIFIED CLOUD IN ITS LATER OPINION IN STONE V.

Opinion No. (1979)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 8, 1979

The State Motorpool is created under the direction of the State Board of Public Affairs by the provisions of 47 O.S. 159 .1 (1971). … See Stemmons, Inc. v. Universal CIT Credit Corp. 301 P.2d 212 (Okla. 1956).

Opinion No. (1979)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 31, 1979

Dear Director Edmison, The Attorney General is in receipt of your request for an opinion wherein you ask, in effect, the following question: May the Pollution Control Coordinating Board adopt a rule or regulation which redefines … Co. v.

Opinion No. 80-039 (1980) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 20, 1980

Ponca City v. Edwards, Okl., 460 P.2d 418 (1969). … The Legislature has left to the municipal governing board the discretion as to which form of financial institution may be utilized.

Opinion No. 77-143 (1977) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 11, 1977

In addition, see Kansas City Southern Railway Company v. City of Heavner, 175 Okl. Cr. 517 , 175 P. 517 ; In re Menefee, 220 Okl. 363 , 97 P. 1014 ; State ex rel Board of Education v. … Board of Education, 161 Okl. 287 , 18 P.2d 863 .

Opinion No. 77-232 (1977) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 21, 1977

Bohn v. Divine, Okla. App., 544 P.2d 916 (1975). … McVicker v. Board of County Commissioners, Okl., 442 P.2d 297 (1968).

Opinion No. (1994)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 24, 1994

STATE V. STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, 630 P.2D 1264 (OKLA.1981). … BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MUSKOGEE COUNTY V. CITY OF MUSKOGEE, 820 P.2D 797 (OKLA.1991). IN OTHER WORDS, THE LEGISLATURE CANNOT SHIFT THE FUNDING BURDEN FROM THE STATE TO COUNTIES OR CITIES. ID. AT 805.

Opinion No. 80-095 (1980) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 31, 1980

However, 19 O.S. 167 [ 19-167 ] (1979), states: "The board of county commissioners of each county is hereby directed to purchase from the lowest bidder a surety contract or contracts in the form known as a 'blanket bond' … See State v. White, Okl., 39 P.2d 69 (1934). Rather, the plain ordinary meaning accorded to the language in the statute should be used in interpretation.