Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,251 results
0.68s
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 21, 1988
THIS SET OF LAWS AUTHORIZED THE CREATION OF LOCAL DRAINAGE DISTRICTS BY THE GOVERNING BOARDS OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IN THE STATE, WITH THE FUNDING OF THESE DISTRICTS TO COME PRIMARILY FROM ASSESSMENTS LEVIED AGAINST LOCAL … BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF LINCOLN COUNTY V. WXC CO., 473 P.2D 231 (OKLA. APP. 1970); ACCORD DE LOZIER V. COLLIER, 230 P.2D 240 (OKLA. 1924).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 13, 1972
McVicker v. Board of Commissioners of Caddo County, Okl., 442 P.2d 297 , 302 (1968). … Trask v. Johnson, Okl., 452 P.2d 575 , 577 (1969).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 19, 1979
See Board of County Commissioners of Creek County v. Bruce, 51 Okla. 541 152 P. 125 (1915). As such, they possess only that authority which is conferred upon them by statute. … See Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County v. Oklahoma City, Okla. 484 P.2d 882 (1971).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 19, 1978
Moore-Norman Area Vocational Technical School District v. Board of Trustees of South Oklahoma City Junior College, 519 P.2d 497 , 501 (Okla. 1974). See also McCurtain County Excise Board v. St. … Grand Jury of McCurtain County v. Pate, 572 P.2d 226 (Okla. 1977); Wiseman v. Boren, 545 P.2d 753 (Okla. 1976).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 10, 2002
See, e.g., 67 O.S. 2001 , § 203[ 67-203 ] (d) (defining "agency" as "any department, office, commission, board, authority or other unit, however designated, of the state government." … Osprey L.L.C. v. Kelly-Moore Paint Co., 984 P.2d 194 , 199 (Okla. 1999).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 10, 1969
Smith v. State Board of Education, 190 Okl. 556 , 126 P.2d 241 (1942). Furthermore, ". . . the tax exemption statute is to be strictly construed against the exemption." Board of Equalization of Oklahoma County v. … Also, in Board of Commissioners v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 10, 2002
¶ 1 The Legislature has mandated that all equipment in the custody of a county government in Oklahoma be subject to inventory and accounting: "The board of county commissioners in each county of this state shall take, or … Petuskey v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 4, 1990
OUTSIDE OF OKLAHOMA TO THE EXTENT AN OKLAHOMA CAPITAL INVESTMENT BOARD GUARANTEED FUND OR PORTFOLIO ATTRACTS AT LEAST MATCHING CO-INVESTMENT IN OKLAHOMA BUSINESSES OR PROJECTS. 74 O.S. 5061 .8 (1990). … IN FINDING THE ACT DID NOT VIOLATE THIS PROVISION, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL NOTED THAT PURSUANT TO WAY V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 14, 2001
Stemmons, Inc. v. Universal C.I.T. Credit Corp., 301 P.2d 212 , 216 (Okla. 1956). … Oliver v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 25, 1979
See State v. Pierce, 11 Wn. App. 577 , 523 P.2d 1201 (1974). In Boydston v. … applicable statute, which may not be enlarged by the board itself."
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 19, 1970
(Emphasis added) In Board of Trustees of Fireman's R. P. Fund v. … Steck v. Prentice (Colo.) 95 P. 552 ; Norris v. Cross, 25 Okla. 287 , 105 P. 1000 ; Chesapeake O. Ry. Co. v. Pack, 6 W. Va. 397 , 403 ; Satcher v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 28, 1984
OPINION — AG — ** AD VALOREM TAXATION — REVENUES — APPORTIONMENT ** (1) UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF 70 O.S. 691 [ 70-691 ] AND THE RULING OF "INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, TULSA COUNTY V. … BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, TULSA COUNTY, 674 P.2d 547 (1983)" ALL COUNTY TREASURERS IN OKLAHOMA MUST CREDIT MONEY EARNED FROM INVESTMENT OF AD VALOREM TAX REVENUES TEMPORARILY IN THEIR CUSTODY, BUT ULTIMATELY ATTRIBUTABLE
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 27, 2004
See also Sugarman v. … See Foley v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 22, 1972
(Emphasis added) In McVicker v. … Board of Commissioners of Caddo County, Okl., 442 P.2d 297 , 302 (1968), the Court stated: "All courts recognize that if the wording of a provision of a statute or constitution is plain, clear and unambiguous, its evident
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 16, 1969
(Emphasis added) The Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma in State ex rel Settles v. Board of Education of Dependent School District no. … (Emphasis added) The Supreme Court has held in Dowell v. Board of Education of Oklahoma City, 195 Ok 1 . 342, 91 P.2d 771 (1939), that: "A school district is a subordinate agency of the State. . . ."
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 11, 2008
Tax Comm'n v. Fortinberry Co. , 207 P.2d 301 , 304 (Okla. 1949) (citation omitted). ¶ 11 The implied powers doctrine was also utilized in Board of Examiners v. Tubbs , 307 P.2d 830 , 831-32 (Okla. 1957). … County Excise Bd. v. Kurn , 115 P.2d 113 , 115 (Okla. 1941 ), Okla. Tax Comm'n v. Fortinberry Co. , 207 P.2d 301 , 304 (Okla. 1949 ), Bd. of Exam'rs v. Tubbs , 307 P.2d 830 , 831-32 (Okla. 1957). 3.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 4, 1963
WHICH HE IS A MEMBER, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER OR HOW HE VOTED THEREON. (3) NO MEMBER OF THE LEGISLATURE MAY RECEIVE COMPENSATION OUT OF THE GENERAL FUND OF ANY SCHOOL DISTRICT TO WHICH THERE HAS BEEN APPORTIONED BY THE STATE BOARD … CITE: 70 O.S. 1961 , 4-30 [70-4-30], ARTICLE V, SECTION 24, 70 O.S. 1961 , 18-4(1)(C) [70-18-4], 70 O.S. 1961 , 18-4 [70-18-4], 70 O.S. 1961 , 18-1 [70-18-1], 70 O.S. 1961 , 18-4(2) [70-18-4], 70 O.S. 1961 , 18-2 [70-18-2
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 18, 2000
Specifically, Article X , Section 19 of the Oklahoma Constitution provides: "Every act enacted by the Legislature, and every ordinance and resolution passed by any county, city, town, or municipal board or local legislative … Shotts v. Hugh, 551 P.2d 252 , 254 (Okla. 1976). A public trust, therefore, may be created to operate hospitals.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 28, 1975
In Humble Oil and Refining Company v. … New Haven Board of Education, 237 A.2d 373 (Conn.S.Ct. 1967); Columbia Transportation Corporation v. Kramer, 206 N.Y. Supp. 2d 893 (N.Y.S.Ct. 1960).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 28, 1968
Board of Public instruction, 368 U.S. 278 , 82 S.Ct. 275 , 7 L.Ed.2d 285 (1961); then followed the "guilt by association" doctrine of the Elfbrandt v. Russell, 384 U.S. 11 S.Ct. 1238 , 16 L.Ed.2d 321 (1966). … The following oath was held constitutional in Knight v. Board of Regents, 269 F. Supp. 339 , (Dist.Ct.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna