Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersoklaag

2,251 results

0.41s

  • Opinion No. 68-320 (1968) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 26, 1968

    , as hereinafter provided . . . "(2) A Corporation desiring a certificate of authorization shall file with the Board an application . . . ." … Chapman v. Koenig, 205 Okl. 402 , 238 P.2d 357 (1951).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1988)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 23, 1988

    COMMUNICATION ON DECEMBER 7, 1988, CONCERNING DUAL OFFICE HOLDING, AS STATE LAWS WOULD APPLY TO A SITUATION INVOLVING A PERSON EMPLOYED AS AN EMPLOYEE OF A MUNICIPALITY AND AT THE SAME TIME SERVING AS A MEMBER OF THE GOVERNING BOARD … OKLAHOMA CITY V. CENTURY INDEMNITY COMPANY, 62 P.2D 94 (OKLA. 1936). IF ANY OF THE THREE ELEMENTS ARE NOT PRESENT, THE POSITION IS A MERE EMPLOYMENT, AND NOT AN OFFICE.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2001)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 25, 2001

    Jackson v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 16, 648 P.2d 26 , 29 (Okla. 1982) (footnote omitted). … See Alva State Bank Trust Co. v. Dayton, 755 P.2d 635 , 636-37 (Okla. 1988); Djowharzadeh v. City Nat'l Bank Trust Co., 646 P.2d 616 , 619 (Okla.Ct.App. 1982).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Question Submitted by: The Honorable Mike Ritze, State Representative, District 80 The Honorable Chris Kannady, State Representative, District 91 The Honorable Kevin Calvey, State Representative, District 82

    2015 OK AG 12 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 30, 2015

    Brown v. Dunnaway , 1952 OK 297 , ¶ 13 248 P.2d 232, 234 ; see also City of Chickasha v. … Hammons Discussed 1961 OK 286 , 366 P.2d 629 , CITY OF TULSA v. SWANSON Discussed 1952 OK 297 , 248 P.2d 232 , 207 Okla 144, STATE EX REL. BROWN v.

    Cited 3 timesUnpublished
  • Opinion No. (1979)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 27, 1979

    See Board of County Commissioners v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, 212 P.2d 462 (Okla. 1949). … Section 8 or ". . . the secretary of the board of directors . . ."

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 79-260 (1979) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 25, 1979

    See State v. Pierce, 11 Wn. App. 577 , 523 P.2d 1201 (1974). In Boydston v. … applicable statute, which may not be enlarged by the board itself."

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 69-146 (1969) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 19, 1969

    In Town of Chouteau v. … And in Lutes v. Thompson, 193 Okl. 331 , 143 P.2d 135 (1943), the same court said: "Construction and maintenance of county highways fall within the statutory duties of county commissioners.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1990)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 26, 1990

    V. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF TULSA, 468 P.2D 501 (OKLA. 1970). SEVERAL MUNICIPALITIES MEET THE CRITERIA FOR THE QUALIFICATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS AND MANY MUNICIPALITIES DO NOT. … MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF RETIREMENT V. MURGIA, 427 U.S. 307 , 96 S.CT. 2562 , 49 L.ED.2D 520 (1976).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1979)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 19, 1979

    See Board of County Commissioners of Creek County v. Bruce, 51 Okla. 541 152 P. 125 (1915). As such, they possess only that authority which is conferred upon them by statute. … See Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County v. Oklahoma City, Okla. 484 P.2d 882 (1971).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 78-248 (1978) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 19, 1978

    Moore-Norman Area Vocational Technical School District v. Board of Trustees of South Oklahoma City Junior College, 519 P.2d 497 , 501 (Okla. 1974). See also McCurtain County Excise Board v. St. … Grand Jury of McCurtain County v. Pate, 572 P.2d 226 (Okla. 1977); Wiseman v. Boren, 545 P.2d 753 (Okla. 1976).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 72-207 (1972) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 13, 1972

    McVicker v. Board of Commissioners of Caddo County, Okl., 442 P.2d 297 , 302 (1968). … Trask v. Johnson, Okl., 452 P.2d 575 , 577 (1969).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2002)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 10, 2002

    See, e.g., 67 O.S. 2001 , § 203[ 67-203 ] (d) (defining "agency" as "any department, office, commission, board, authority or other unit, however designated, of the state government." … Osprey L.L.C. v. Kelly-Moore Paint Co., 984 P.2d 194 , 199 (Okla. 1999).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 69-308 (1996) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 10, 1969

    Smith v. State Board of Education, 190 Okl. 556 , 126 P.2d 241 (1942). Furthermore, ". . . the tax exemption statute is to be strictly construed against the exemption." Board of Equalization of Oklahoma County v. … Also, in Board of Commissioners v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2002)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 10, 2002

    ¶ 1 The Legislature has mandated that all equipment in the custody of a county government in Oklahoma be subject to inventory and accounting: "The board of county commissioners in each county of this state shall take, or … Petuskey v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1990)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 4, 1990

    OUTSIDE OF OKLAHOMA TO THE EXTENT AN OKLAHOMA CAPITAL INVESTMENT BOARD GUARANTEED FUND OR PORTFOLIO ATTRACTS AT LEAST MATCHING CO-INVESTMENT IN OKLAHOMA BUSINESSES OR PROJECTS. 74 O.S. 5061 .8 (1990). … IN FINDING THE ACT DID NOT VIOLATE THIS PROVISION, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL NOTED THAT PURSUANT TO WAY V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 70-210 (1970) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 19, 1970

    The Trustees, in fact, are the members of the Utility Board of the City of Tulsa. … In State v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 73-303 (1974) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 23, 1974

    MacLeod, 308 U.S. 561 , 60 S.Ct. 72 , 84 L.Ed. 471 ; Dodge v. Board of Education, 302 U.S. 74 , 58 S.Ct. 98 , 82 L.Ed. 57 . The United States Supreme Court described the effect of a statutory policy in Dodge v. … Bortel v. Board of Education, 240 A.2d 678 (1968).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2001)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 14, 2001

    Stemmons, Inc. v. Universal C.I.T. Credit Corp., 301 P.2d 212 , 216 (Okla. 1956). … Oliver v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1979)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 25, 1979

    See State v. Pierce, 11 Wn. App. 577 , 523 P.2d 1201 (1974). In Boydston v. … applicable statute, which may not be enlarged by the board itself."

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 69-107 (1969) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 3, 1969

    It has been held, in Maynard and Child Inc. v. Shearer Ky., 290 S .W. 2d 790, 794, that an officers' club is an instrumentality of the United States. It has also been held, in Falls City Brewing Co. v. Reaves D.C. … In the case of Youngblood v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.