Case law

Opinion No. 74-227 (1975) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 10, 1975

Barton v. Derryberry, 500 P.2d 281 (Okl., 1972); Bass v. Board of Commissioners of Lincoln County, 222 P. 995 (Okl., 1924); Attorney General Opinion No. 74-180; Attorney General Opinion No. 65-294. … of Commissioners of Delaware County v.

Opinion No. (2003)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 20, 2003

As was noted by the Oklahoma Supreme Court in Irwin v. … , subject to Board approval. . . .

Opinion No. 75-340 (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 16, 1976

Use of the word "shall" is equivalent to the word "must" and leaves the Board no discretion to avoid following this statute. State v. Jennings, Okl., 463 P.2d 690 , 692 (1970); Ogden v. … In Marcus v.

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 9, 1976

in which such child resides, under rules and regulations approved by the State Board of Education; provided, however, that the eligibility of exceptional children shall be reevaluated at least once every three (3) years. … In this regard see Sebring v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp., 401 P.2d 479 , and other cases cited at 13 Okla. Digest, page 503, et seq.

Opinion No. (2005)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 4, 2005

See Cavin v. … Bd. of County Comm'rs, 33 P.2d 477 , 479 (Okla. 1934) ("the board of county commissioners is a legal entity not dependent upon who happens to fill the offices[;] [i]t is a board and not a collection of individuals").

Opinion No. (1987) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 8, 1987

CITY COUNCIL OR OTHER GOVERNING BODY OF ANY CITY, BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF ANY TOWN, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ANY TOWNSHIP . . . TO FURNISH, FOR A CONSIDERATION ANY MATERIAL OR SUPPLIES FOR THE USE OF SAID . . . … BOARD HAD NO OTHER BUSINESS OR PERSONAL RELATIONSHIP WITH THE SELLER.

Opinion No. (1990)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 6, 1990

The board of education of any school district may: 1. … See, Hess v. Excise Board of McCurtain County, 698 P.2d 930 (Okla. 1985).

Opinion No. (2003)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 22, 2003

Quinn v. … Pursuant to Reddell v.

Opinion No. 68-164 (1968) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 13, 1968

The director and assistant directors shall constitute a Board of Control of the Bureau of Standards. The members of the Board of Control shall serve without salary." … Board of Regents of University of Oklahoma v. Childers, 197 Okl. 350 , 170 P.2d 1018 ; McSpadden v. Mahoney, Okl. 402 P.2d 656 . Therefore, we answer both of your inquiries in the affirmative.

Opinion No. (2000)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 21, 2000

The Oklahoma State Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners' Rule, OAC 775:10-5-30 (f)(3) (2000) set forth above, is a clear prohibition on such practice. … "Rules and regulations enacted by administrative agencies and boards pursuant to the powers delegated to them have the force and effect of law." Cox v.

Opinion No. 74-152 (1974) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 27, 1974

Boydston v. State, 277 P.2d 138 (1955); Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Moss, 509 P.2d 666 , 668 . … City of Duncan v. Bingham, Okl., 394 P.2d 456 (1964).

Opinion No. (2002)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 5, 2002

Brown v. City of Warr Acres, 946 P.2d 1140 , 1143 (Okla. 1997). For an expenditure to be for a public purpose it must benefit the public, as opposed to special interests or persons, and consideration must be given. … Burkhardt v. City of Enid, 771 P.2d 608 , 611 (Okla. 1989) (quoting Bd. of County Comm's v. Shaw, 182 P.2d 507 , 515 (Okla. 1947)).

Opinion No. (1996)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 22, 1996

Quinn v. … See Derieg v.

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 24, 1967

OPINION — AG — QUESTION(1): "WHERE IT IS DETERMINED THAT CERTAIN ACCOUNTS OWING TO THE STATE INSURANCE FUND BY INDIVIDUALS, CORPORATIONS, PARTNERSHIPS, BOARDS, AGENCIES, COMMISSIONS OR INSTITUTIONS ARE WORTHLESS AND CANNOT … 2): "MAY THE STATE INSURANCE FUND" CHARGE OFF "THESE UNCOLLECTIBLE ACCOUNTS WHERE THE SAME ARE CLEARLY WORTHLESS AND UNCOLLECTIBLE, AND CEASE TO SHOW THEM AS ASSETS IN THEIR RECORDS WITHOUT BEING IN VIOLATION OF ARTICLE V

Opinion No. 69-191 (1969) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1969

In State v. … In the case of Madeley v. Trustees of Conroe Independent School Dist., Tex., 130 S.W.2d 929 (1939), it is stated that the term "maintenance" of schools does not include the cost of the construction of school houses.

Opinion No. (1979) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 12, 1979

Board of County Commissioners, County of Muskogee. The Legislature granted pay raises to county officers by adopting 19 O.S. 180 .62 [ 19-180.62 ] (1978). … In Kirk et al., v.

Opinion No. 71-238 (1971) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 16, 1971

Construction Co. v. … In the case of Semke v.

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 16, 1984

OF TIME AS DISTINGUISHED FROM CONTINUING EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS AUTHORIZED BY 70 O.S. 6 -101 [ 70-6-101 ] (2) THE CIRCUMSTANCES UNDER WHICH A TEMPORARY CONTRACT MAY BE USED IS WITHIN THE DISCRETION OF THE DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARDS … NO. 77-249, OPINION NO. 82-159 (BETTY ELROD HUNTER) ** SEE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION NO. 87,773 (1996) SCHEER V.

Opinion No. (1999)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 11, 1999

Article V , Section 34 and Article V, Section 35. After passage, the legislation must be signed by the Governor. Okla. Const. Article VI , Section 11 . … McAllester v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, 50 P.2d 647 , 651 (Okla. 1935). When all the requirements for passage of law are not fulfilled, a resolution is "the mere expression of an opinion." Hawks v.

Opinion No. (1992)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 2, 1992

IN OKLAHOMA CITY V. … BOARD OF LIBRARY TRUSTEES, 169 P.2D 201 (OKLA.1946) (OFFICER IS ONE VESTED WITH SOME PORTION OF THE FUNCTIONS OF THE GOVERNMENT TO BE EXERCISED FOR THE PUBLIC BENEFIT) (CITING FARLEY V.