Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,251 results
1.31s
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 10, 1975
Barton v. Derryberry, 500 P.2d 281 (Okl., 1972); Bass v. Board of Commissioners of Lincoln County, 222 P. 995 (Okl., 1924); Attorney General Opinion No. 74-180; Attorney General Opinion No. 65-294. … of Commissioners of Delaware County v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 16, 1976
Use of the word "shall" is equivalent to the word "must" and leaves the Board no discretion to avoid following this statute. State v. Jennings, Okl., 463 P.2d 690 , 692 (1970); Ogden v. … In Marcus v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 30, 1970
In City of Tulsa v. Melton, 175 Okl. 581 , 54 P.2d 159 , 160 (1936), wherein the plaintiff in error was seeking to recover a salary as a Municipal Judge the Supreme Court stated: "In the case of Anderson v. … See also, Board of Com'rs v. Twyford, 39 Okl. 230 , 134 P. 968 (1913); Rackley v. City of Purcell, 40 Okl. 186 , 137 P. 100 (1913); and Shelton v. State, 62 Okl. 105 , 162 P. 224 (1917).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 19, 1979
See State v. Pierce, 11 Wn. App. 577 , 523 P.2d 1201 (1974). In Boydston v. … applicable statute, which may not be enlarged by the board itself.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 22, 1996
Quinn v. … See Derieg v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 24, 1967
OPINION — AG — QUESTION(1): "WHERE IT IS DETERMINED THAT CERTAIN ACCOUNTS OWING TO THE STATE INSURANCE FUND BY INDIVIDUALS, CORPORATIONS, PARTNERSHIPS, BOARDS, AGENCIES, COMMISSIONS OR INSTITUTIONS ARE WORTHLESS AND CANNOT … 2): "MAY THE STATE INSURANCE FUND" CHARGE OFF "THESE UNCOLLECTIBLE ACCOUNTS WHERE THE SAME ARE CLEARLY WORTHLESS AND UNCOLLECTIBLE, AND CEASE TO SHOW THEM AS ASSETS IN THEIR RECORDS WITHOUT BEING IN VIOLATION OF ARTICLE V
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 10, 1985
Cavett v. Geary Board of Ed ., supra. I . … See Southwest Securities Co. v. Board of Education of Village of Lovington, supra, and Board of Education Etc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 3, 1999
McLoud Telephone Company v. State Board of Equalization, 655 P.2d 1037 , 1040 (Okla. 1982). In 1994 the Oklahoma Supreme Court in Williams Natural Gas Company v. … Id. citing Nordlinger v. Hahn, 505 U.S. 1 , 11 (1992) (citing Cleburne v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 9, 1987
OPINION — AG — ** PRESIDENTIAL PREFERENTIAL PRIMARY ACT — PROCEDURES — STATE ELECTION BOARD ** (1) THE OKLAHOMA PRESIDENTIAL PREFERENTIAL PRIMARY ACT (THE ACT) OF 1986, 26 O.S. 20 -101 [ 26-20-101 ] ET SEQ., IS CONSTITUTIONAL … (ELECTION DATE, PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATIONS, PARTY CONVENTIONS, AMEND 1, ASSOCIATIONAL RIGHTS, PRIMARY ELECTIONS) CITE: ARTICLE IV, SECTION 1, ARTICLE V, SECTION 36, 19 O.S. 381 [ 19-381 ], 26 O.S. 12 -018 [26-12-018], 26 O.S
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 3, 1968
This concept of constitutional interpretation was applied by the Supreme Court of Oklahoma in McCurtain County Excise Board v. St. … In Baker v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 25, 1963
COOKSON. (3) THERE IS NO AUTHORITY FOR REASSESSING UNDERVALUED PROPERTY SUBSEQUENT TO THE ADJOURNMENT OF THE COUNTY EQUALIZATION BOARD UNLESS FRAUD OR CONCEALMENT HAS BEEN PRACTICED BY THE OWNER OR HIS AGENT. … COOKSON. (3) THERE IS NO AUTHORITY FOR REASSESSING UNDERVALUED PROPERTY SUBSEQUENT TO THE ADJOURNMENT OF THE COUNTY EQUALIZATION BOARD UNLESS FRAUD OR CONCEALMENT HAS BEEN PRACTICED BY THE OWNER OR HIS AGENT.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 12, 1978
Refer, generally, "Oklahoma State Department of Education, Policies of the State Board of Education for the Issuance of a High School Equivalency Certificate". … League v. New York Stock Exchange, 367 F. Supp. 1376 (1973).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 12, 1969
City of Duncan ex rel Board of Trustees of Police Pension and Retirement System v. Barnes, Okl. 293 P.2d 590 (1956). … Article V , Section 55 Oklahoma Constitution.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 28, 1979
Board of Trustees of Firemen's Relief and Pension Fund of Muskogee v. Templeton, 184 Okl. 281 , 86 P.2d 1000 (1939). In that connection, we may look to the context of the statutes as in aid to construction. … "(c) * * * Each funeral conducted within the State of Oklahoma must be under the personal supervision and presence of a duly licensed funeral director or an assistant funeral director who holds a valid license from the Board
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 9, 1992
SHALL BE UNLAWFUL AND A MISDEMEANOR FOR ANY PERSON TO ACT, OPERATE, OR DO BUSINESS OR ADVERTISE AS A COMMERCIAL, NONCOMMERCIAL OR PRIVATE APPLICATOR UNLESS SUCH PERSON HAS OBTAINED A VALID APPLICATOR'S LICENSE ISSUED BY THE BOARD … STATE V. HUMPHREY, 620 P.2D 408 (OKL.CR.1980). ADDITIONALLY, THERE DO NOT APPEAR TO BE ANY REPORTED CASES CONSTRUING THE OKLAHOMA LAWS RELATING TO LICENSURE OF PESTICIDE APPLICATORS. II.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 7, 2001
See, e.g., Fuller v. Odom, 741 P.2d 449 , 452 (Okla. 1987). … See Henry v. City of Muskogee, 986 P.2d 1151 , 1152 (Okla.Ct.App. 1999) (citing First Cmty. Bank v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 29, 1994
Sneed v. Sneed, 585 P.2d 1363 (Okla. 1978). … Bell v. United Farm Agency Inc., 296 P.2d 149 (Okla. 1956). Finally, a statute should be given a sensible construction, bearing in mind the evils to be avoided or the remedy afforded. Samson Resources Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 2, 1986
City of Tulsa v. Smittle , 702 P.2d 367 (Okla. 1985). … Cartwright v. Georgia-Pacific , 663 P.2d 718 (Okla. 1983).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 18, 1985
Jackson v. Independent School District No. 16 , 648 P.2d 26 (Okla. 1982). This is to be accomplished by giving terms used in an act, if not specifically defined, their plain, ordinary meaning. … O.S. 1 (1981), and the existence of a contract is dependent, among other things, upon free mutual consent of the parties, and "[s]ufficient cause or consideration." 15 O.S. 2 , 15 O.S. 51 (1981); Powers Restaurants Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 5, 2009
Aurora County v. Cir. Ct., Fifth Jud. Cir. , 268 N.W.2d 607 , 609 (S. D. 1978). An ex officio member may be a voting or nonvoting member of the public body and is usually denoted as one or the other by statute. … See, e.g. , 70 O.S. 2001 , § 5-113.2[ 70-5-113.2 ] (providing that school board members involved in certain litigation may be excluded from executive sessions by majority vote of the board members); 2009 Okla. Sess.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna