Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersoklaag

2,251 results

1.54s

  • Opinion No. 79-143 (1979) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 5, 1979

    Barnes v. Transok Pipeline, Okl., 549 P.2d 819 (1976). Furthermore, where the performance of a statutory requirement is mandatory there can be no compliance except in accordance with the particular provision. Oldham v. … Thus, a board of County Commissioners is authorized to make such finding of vacancy and shall formalize their findings by order or resolution.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 16, 1981

    OPINION — AG — *** RETIREMENT SYSTEM — CREDITABLE MILITARY SERVICE *** THE GOVERNING BOARDS OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS WITHIN THIS STATE ARE 'NOT' REQUIRED TO INCLUDE THE YEARS OF CREDITABLE MILITARY SERVICE PROVIDED FOR IN LAWS … GIVENS) == SEE: 769 P.2d 1302 (1988), ALLEN V. STATE EX REL BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE OKLAHOMA UNIFORM RETIREMENT SYSTEM FOR JUSTICE AND JUDGES

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2004)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 3, 2004

    Jackson v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 16, 648 P.2d 26 , 29 (Okla. 1982). … Cooper v. State ex rel. Dep't of Pub.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 80-214 (1980) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 9, 1980

    In construing 364, the Supreme Court said in Board of Trustees v. … State v. Police Pension Board, 56 Wis.2d 602 , 203 N.W.2d 74 (1973); City of Duncan v. Bingham, Okl., 394 P.2d 456 , 460 (1964); Board of Trustees v. Hicks, supra.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 51-0201

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 1, 1951

    OPINION — AG — ** COUNT BOARD OF EQUALIZATION — QUALIFICATIONS — APPOINTMENT ** 68 O.S. 15 .38 [68-15.38] WHICH PROVIDES THAT ONE MEMBER OF THE COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION SHALL LIVE IN THE COUNTY SEAT OF THE COUNTY, IS … 'NOT' WITHIN THE RESTRICTIVE TITLE OF SAID AMENDMENT ACT OF 1945; AND THEREFORE IS, IS VOID AND INEFFECTIVE AS BEING IN VIOLATION OF THAT PART OF ARTICLE V , SECTION 57 (OKLAHOMA CONSTITUTION) WHICH PROVIDES THAT " EVERY

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1991) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 6, 1991

    OKLAHOMA CITY V. CENTURY INDEMNITY CO., 62 P.2D 94 (OKLA. 1936). … NO OTHER STATUTORY EXCEPTION WAS FOUND WHICH WILL ALLOW A MUNICIPAL ATTORNEY TO SERVE FOR MORE THAN ONE CITY, NOR TO SERVE AS A SCHOOL BOARD MEMBER WHILE SERVING AS MUNICIPAL ATTORNEY. (GLEN D. HAMMONS)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 2, 1990

    OR COMMISSION DOES 'NOT' VIOLATE ARTICLE V , SECTION 51 OF THE OKLAHOMA CONSTITUTION. 2. … OR COMMISSION DOES VIOLATE ARTICLE V , SECTION 51 OF THE OKLAHOMA CONSTITUTION. 3.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1997)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 14, 1997

    In Rheam v. Board of Regents, 18 P.2d 535 (Okla. 1933), the Oklahoma Supreme Court considered a challenge of a $2.50 entrance fee established by the Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma. … Board of Regents.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1998)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 11, 1998

    Section 789 of Title 19 mandates in pertinent part: It shall be the duty of the board of county commissioners to place the management and control of said hospital either under a board of control composed of five, seven or … If the board of county commissioners determines it is for the best interest of the county, they may in lieu of operation of the hospital through a board of control lease the hospital and equipment therein to a charitable

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 70-150 (1970) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 27, 1970

    In James v. … y in the local district or school board as trustee for the public at large.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 73-240 (1973) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 17, 1973

    In summary, the determination of whether to renegotiate the loan with OCIA is an administrative decision to be made by the Board of Directors of OIFA according to sound business principles. … The restrictions of Article V , Section 53 of the Oklahoma Constitution would not apply to this situation.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1994)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 15, 1994

    Sneed v. Sneed, 585 P.2d 1363 (Okla. 1978). … Southwestern Bell Co. v. Oklahoma Co., 618 P.2d 915 , 919 (Okla. 1980).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1989)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 2, 1989

    YORK V. … SEE, RASURE V. SPARKS, OKL. 75 OKL. 181, 183 P. 495 , 498 (1919) AND PAN AMERICAN PETRO. CORP. V. BOARD OF TAX ROLL COR., OKL., 510 P.2D 680, 681 (1973).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 9, 1956

    OPINION — AG — ** ELECTION — LEGISLATURE — LOT ** (1) THE STATE ELECTION BOARD IS 'NOT' AUTHORIZED BY 26 O.S. 133 [26-133], IN THE EVENT A TIE VOTE OCCURS IN THE ELECTION OF A STATE SENATOR (OR REPRESENTATIVE) IN A GENERAL … (TIE VOTE, CERTIFICATES, QUALIFICATIONS) CITE: ARTICLE VI, SECTION 6, ARTICLE V, SECTION 30, 26 O.S. 113 [ 26-113 ], 26 O.S. 392 [ 26-392 ], ARTICLE XV, SECTION (FRED HANSEN)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1988)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 15, 1988

    AN EMPLOYEE OF ANY STATE DEPARTMENT BOARD. BOARD OF REGENTS OR BOARD OF TRUSTEES, WHO IS IN A SUPERVISORY OR AN ADMINISTRATIVE POSITION. … GILBERT CENTRAL CORP V. STATE, 716 P.2D 654 (OKL. 1986). THE OPERATIVE RULE OF GRAMMAR IS THE ONE THAT PLACES RELATIVE PRONOUNS (THE WORD "WHICH") AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE TO THEIR ANTECEDENTS (THE WORD "POSITION").

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 2, 1988

    The authority of state boards to make rules for their various procedures does not, however, include the authority to make rules which in effect extend their powers beyond those granted by statute. Boydston v. … Boughton v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 354 P.2d 1085 (Okl. 1960); Wilson v. Gregg, 255 P.2d 517 (Okl. 1953); and Burke Grain Co. v. Stinchcomb, 173 P. 204 (Okl. 1918).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Question Submitted by: The Honorable Stan May, Oklahoma House of Representatives, District 80

    2024 OK AG 13 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 19, 2024

    See Rogers v. … PORTER v. FERRELL Discussed Title 6.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1989)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 29, 1989

    YORK V. … SEE, RASURE V. SPARKS, OKL. 75 OKL. 181, 183 P. 495 , 498 (1919) AND PAN AMERICAN PETRO. CORP. V. BOARD OF TAXROLL COR., OKL., 510 P.2D 680, 681 (1973).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 79-311 (1980) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 15, 1980

    Wiseman v. Oklahoma Board of Corrections, et al., Okl. _____ P.2d _____ (1978), 49 OBJ 2436. The Wiseman v. Board of Corrections decision presently pends on rehearing. … See also, Gordon v. Conners, 183 Okl. 82 , 80 P.2d 322 (1938); Board of Commissioners of Pottawotamie County v. A. C. Davis and Sons, 184 Okl. 258 , 86 P.2d 782 (1939).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 70-215 (1970) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 7, 1970

    In Board of Commissioners, Wyandotte County v. … In Board of Education of Oklahoma City v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.