Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,251 results
1.54s
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 5, 1979
Barnes v. Transok Pipeline, Okl., 549 P.2d 819 (1976). Furthermore, where the performance of a statutory requirement is mandatory there can be no compliance except in accordance with the particular provision. Oldham v. … Thus, a board of County Commissioners is authorized to make such finding of vacancy and shall formalize their findings by order or resolution.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 16, 1981
OPINION — AG — *** RETIREMENT SYSTEM — CREDITABLE MILITARY SERVICE *** THE GOVERNING BOARDS OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS WITHIN THIS STATE ARE 'NOT' REQUIRED TO INCLUDE THE YEARS OF CREDITABLE MILITARY SERVICE PROVIDED FOR IN LAWS … GIVENS) == SEE: 769 P.2d 1302 (1988), ALLEN V. STATE EX REL BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE OKLAHOMA UNIFORM RETIREMENT SYSTEM FOR JUSTICE AND JUDGES
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 3, 2004
Jackson v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 16, 648 P.2d 26 , 29 (Okla. 1982). … Cooper v. State ex rel. Dep't of Pub.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 9, 1980
In construing 364, the Supreme Court said in Board of Trustees v. … State v. Police Pension Board, 56 Wis.2d 602 , 203 N.W.2d 74 (1973); City of Duncan v. Bingham, Okl., 394 P.2d 456 , 460 (1964); Board of Trustees v. Hicks, supra.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 1, 1951
OPINION — AG — ** COUNT BOARD OF EQUALIZATION — QUALIFICATIONS — APPOINTMENT ** 68 O.S. 15 .38 [68-15.38] WHICH PROVIDES THAT ONE MEMBER OF THE COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION SHALL LIVE IN THE COUNTY SEAT OF THE COUNTY, IS … 'NOT' WITHIN THE RESTRICTIVE TITLE OF SAID AMENDMENT ACT OF 1945; AND THEREFORE IS, IS VOID AND INEFFECTIVE AS BEING IN VIOLATION OF THAT PART OF ARTICLE V , SECTION 57 (OKLAHOMA CONSTITUTION) WHICH PROVIDES THAT " EVERY
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 6, 1991
OKLAHOMA CITY V. CENTURY INDEMNITY CO., 62 P.2D 94 (OKLA. 1936). … NO OTHER STATUTORY EXCEPTION WAS FOUND WHICH WILL ALLOW A MUNICIPAL ATTORNEY TO SERVE FOR MORE THAN ONE CITY, NOR TO SERVE AS A SCHOOL BOARD MEMBER WHILE SERVING AS MUNICIPAL ATTORNEY. (GLEN D. HAMMONS)
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 2, 1990
OR COMMISSION DOES 'NOT' VIOLATE ARTICLE V , SECTION 51 OF THE OKLAHOMA CONSTITUTION. 2. … OR COMMISSION DOES VIOLATE ARTICLE V , SECTION 51 OF THE OKLAHOMA CONSTITUTION. 3.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 14, 1997
In Rheam v. Board of Regents, 18 P.2d 535 (Okla. 1933), the Oklahoma Supreme Court considered a challenge of a $2.50 entrance fee established by the Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma. … Board of Regents.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 11, 1998
Section 789 of Title 19 mandates in pertinent part: It shall be the duty of the board of county commissioners to place the management and control of said hospital either under a board of control composed of five, seven or … If the board of county commissioners determines it is for the best interest of the county, they may in lieu of operation of the hospital through a board of control lease the hospital and equipment therein to a charitable
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 27, 1970
In James v. … y in the local district or school board as trustee for the public at large.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 17, 1973
In summary, the determination of whether to renegotiate the loan with OCIA is an administrative decision to be made by the Board of Directors of OIFA according to sound business principles. … The restrictions of Article V , Section 53 of the Oklahoma Constitution would not apply to this situation.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 15, 1994
Sneed v. Sneed, 585 P.2d 1363 (Okla. 1978). … Southwestern Bell Co. v. Oklahoma Co., 618 P.2d 915 , 919 (Okla. 1980).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 2, 1989
YORK V. … SEE, RASURE V. SPARKS, OKL. 75 OKL. 181, 183 P. 495 , 498 (1919) AND PAN AMERICAN PETRO. CORP. V. BOARD OF TAX ROLL COR., OKL., 510 P.2D 680, 681 (1973).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 9, 1956
OPINION — AG — ** ELECTION — LEGISLATURE — LOT ** (1) THE STATE ELECTION BOARD IS 'NOT' AUTHORIZED BY 26 O.S. 133 [26-133], IN THE EVENT A TIE VOTE OCCURS IN THE ELECTION OF A STATE SENATOR (OR REPRESENTATIVE) IN A GENERAL … (TIE VOTE, CERTIFICATES, QUALIFICATIONS) CITE: ARTICLE VI, SECTION 6, ARTICLE V, SECTION 30, 26 O.S. 113 [ 26-113 ], 26 O.S. 392 [ 26-392 ], ARTICLE XV, SECTION (FRED HANSEN)
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 15, 1988
AN EMPLOYEE OF ANY STATE DEPARTMENT BOARD. BOARD OF REGENTS OR BOARD OF TRUSTEES, WHO IS IN A SUPERVISORY OR AN ADMINISTRATIVE POSITION. … GILBERT CENTRAL CORP V. STATE, 716 P.2D 654 (OKL. 1986). THE OPERATIVE RULE OF GRAMMAR IS THE ONE THAT PLACES RELATIVE PRONOUNS (THE WORD "WHICH") AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE TO THEIR ANTECEDENTS (THE WORD "POSITION").
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 2, 1988
The authority of state boards to make rules for their various procedures does not, however, include the authority to make rules which in effect extend their powers beyond those granted by statute. Boydston v. … Boughton v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 354 P.2d 1085 (Okl. 1960); Wilson v. Gregg, 255 P.2d 517 (Okl. 1953); and Burke Grain Co. v. Stinchcomb, 173 P. 204 (Okl. 1918).
Cited 0 timesPublishedQuestion Submitted by: The Honorable Stan May, Oklahoma House of Representatives, District 80
2024 OK AG 13 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 19, 2024
See Rogers v. … PORTER v. FERRELL Discussed Title 6.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 29, 1989
YORK V. … SEE, RASURE V. SPARKS, OKL. 75 OKL. 181, 183 P. 495 , 498 (1919) AND PAN AMERICAN PETRO. CORP. V. BOARD OF TAXROLL COR., OKL., 510 P.2D 680, 681 (1973).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 15, 1980
Wiseman v. Oklahoma Board of Corrections, et al., Okl. _____ P.2d _____ (1978), 49 OBJ 2436. The Wiseman v. Board of Corrections decision presently pends on rehearing. … See also, Gordon v. Conners, 183 Okl. 82 , 80 P.2d 322 (1938); Board of Commissioners of Pottawotamie County v. A. C. Davis and Sons, 184 Okl. 258 , 86 P.2d 782 (1939).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 7, 1970
In Board of Commissioners, Wyandotte County v. … In Board of Education of Oklahoma City v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna