Case law

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 9, 1981

OPINION — AG — (1) UNDER ARTICLE V , SECTION 54 OKLAHOMA CONSTITUTION, PERSONS PREVIOUSLY REGISTERED TO PRACTICE SOCIAL WORK WHO DO NOT MEET THE NEW REQUIREMENTS OF HOUSE BILL NO. 1901 CODIFIED AS 59 O.S. 1250 [ 59-1250 ] … IN 59 O.S. 1250 [ 59-1250 ] CITE: 59 O.S. 1261 .1 [ 59-1261.1 ], OPINION NO. 80-285, ARTICLE V, SECTION 54 (PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS, REPEAL OF STATUTE — EFFECT) (KAY HARLEY JACOBS)

Question Submitted by: The Honorable Jon Echols , Oklahoma House of Representatives, District 90

2024 OK AG 19 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 30, 2024

See Oklahoma County Board of County Commissioners v. The City of Oklahoma City , Case No. CV-2024-1659. … Pet. at 10; see also OSCN Case Details for Oklahoma County Board of County Commissioners v. The City of Oklahoma City , Case No. CV-2024-1659, https://www.oscn.net/dockets/GetCaseInformation.aspx?

Opinion No. Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 2, 1988

The authority of state boards to make rules for their various procedures does not, however, include the authority to make rules which in effect extend their powers beyond those granted by statute. Boydston v. … Boughton v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 354 P.2d 1085 (Okl. 1960); Wilson v. Gregg, 255 P.2d 517 (Okl. 1953); and Burke Grain Co. v. Stinchcomb, 173 P. 204 (Okl. 1918).

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 25, 1975

, AND COMMISSIONS CONTRARY TO ARTICLE VI , SECTION 1 OKLAHOMA CONSTITUTION, ARTICLE V , SECTION 1 , ARTICLE V, SECTION 34, ARTICLE V, SECTION 35, ARTICLE V, SECTION 57, ARTICLE V, SECTION 58 AND ARTICLE VI , SECTION 1 OKLAHOMA … SECTION 55, ARTICLE V , SECTION 56 OKLAHOMA CONSTITUTION, TO INCLUDE THE REDUCTION OR TRANSFER OF EXISTING APPROPRIATION TO STATUTORY AGENCIES, BOARDS OR COMMISSIONS.

Opinion No. (1988)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 15, 1988

AN EMPLOYEE OF ANY STATE DEPARTMENT BOARD. BOARD OF REGENTS OR BOARD OF TRUSTEES, WHO IS IN A SUPERVISORY OR AN ADMINISTRATIVE POSITION. … GILBERT CENTRAL CORP V. STATE, 716 P.2D 654 (OKL. 1986). THE OPERATIVE RULE OF GRAMMAR IS THE ONE THAT PLACES RELATIVE PRONOUNS (THE WORD "WHICH") AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE TO THEIR ANTECEDENTS (THE WORD "POSITION").

Opinion No. (1999)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 1, 1999

TXO Production Corporation v. … Supp. 1998, § 5-117.1a[ 70-5-117.1a ] in which the Legislature further empowers the board of education of a school district or a private school, by "a majority vote of the board [to] allow a correctional facility operated

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 21, 1964

OPINION — AG — IN VIEW OF THE PLAIN MEANING AND INTENT OF THE PERTINENT STATUTES AND IN VIEW OF THE FURTHER WELL RECOGNIZED RULE THAT A BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CAN EXERCISE ONLY SUCH POWERS AS ARE CONFERRED UPON IT … BY THE CONSTITUTION OR STATUTES OF THE STATE OR SUCH AS MAY ARISE BY NECESSARY IMPLICATION FROM AN EXPRESS GRANT OF POWER, LAIRMORE V.

Opinion No. (1995)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 8, 1995

Irwin v. … Irwin v. Irwin, 433 P.2d at 934 . See also Gordon v.

Opinion No. (1979)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 5, 1979

Barnes v. Transok Pipeline, Okla., 549 P.2d 819 (1976). Furthermore, where the performance of a statutory requirement is mandatory there can be no compliance except in accordance with the particular provision. Oldham v. … Thus, a board of County Commissioners is authorized to make such finding of vacancy and shall formalize their findings by order or resolution.

Opinion No. 70-233 (1970) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 30, 1970

In the case of Brown v.

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 6, 1963

OF FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS FOR ANY ONE YEAR " AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 1 OF HOUSE BILL NO. 823, SAID BOARD MUST COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SAID BILL. … CITE: 59 O.S. 1961 427 [59-427] ARTICLE V, SECTION 55 (FRED HANSEN)

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 11, 1953

THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD ". . . … CITE: 74 O.D. 351 (B), ARTICLE V, SECTION 55, ARTICLE V, SECTION 57, ARTICLE VI, SECTION 12 (BILL STATUS) (FRED HANSEN)

Opinion No. (1992)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 15, 1992

HESS V. EXCISE BOARD OF MCCURTAIN COUNTY, 698 P.2D 930 (OKLA.1985.) FURTHER, A STATUTE SHOULD BE CONSTRUED TO PRODUCE A REASONABLE RESULT AND TO PROMOTE, RATHER THAN DEFEAT, THE GENERAL PURPOSE AND POLICY OF THE LAW. … V. STATE, 598 P.2D 254 (OKL.CR.1979). THE GENERAL PURPOSE AND POLICY OF THE ACT IS TO PROVIDE A RETIREMENT SYSTEM FOR THOSE MEMBERS DEFINED IN 47 O.S. 2 -300(5) OF THE ACT.

Opinion No. 72-245 (1972) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 16, 1972

In Kuchler v. … Title 11 O.S. 1004 [11-1004] (1971) defines the powers and duties of town boards of trustees. It is provided in part that: "The board of trustees shall have the following powers, viz.: "Seventh.

Opinion No. (2000)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 25, 2000

Hawkins v. … Therefore, funds received by the State under the Revenue Sharing Act were subject to appropriation under Article V, § 55 and to inclusion in the State Board of Equalization's estimate pursuant to Article X, § 23.

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 5, 1980

Wasson v. Carden, Okl., 594 P.2d 1223 (1979); Dowell v. Welch, Okl. App., 574 P.2d 1089 (1978); and Matter of Estate of Rogers, Okl. App., 569 P.2d 536 (1977) . The Oklahoma Supreme Court in Wasson v. … In Dowell v.

Opinion No. 76-146 (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 24, 1976

If not, the Act would be a local or special law within the prohibition of Section 46 of Article V. See, Tulsa Exposition and Fair Board Corp. v. Board of County Commissioners, 468 P.2d 501 (Okl. 1970); Williams v. … Johnson, 396 P.2d 518 (Okl. 1964); Haas v. Nolloman, 327 P.2d 655 (Okl. 1958); Oklahoma City v. Excise Board of Oklahoma County, 193 Okl. 189 , 141 P.2d 805 (1943); Thompson v.

Opinion No. (1991) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 29, 1991

ATTORNEY GENERAL LOVING HAS ASKED ME TO RESPOND TO YOUR LETTER SEEKING A FORMAL OPINION ON THE APPLICABILITY OF CHISOLM V. ROEMER, 501 U.S., 111 S.CT., 115 L.ED.2D 348 (1991), AND HOUSTON LAWYERS ASSOCIATION V. … SANCHEZ V. BOND, 875 F.2D 1488, 1492 (10TH CIR. 1989).

Opinion No. (2003)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 3, 2003

Sneed v. Sneed, 585 P.2d 1363 , 1364 (Okla. 1978). … Co. v. Okla. Tax Comm'n, 563 P.2d 641 , 643 (Okla. 1977); McDonald's Corp. v. Okla. Tax Comm'n, 563 P.2d 635 , 641 (Okla. 1977); Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Okla.

Opinion No. (1995)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 17, 1995

It appears to me to be the intent of the Legislature by its use of 3601 to limit or control the use of personnel resources by the identified agencies, boards or programs. … Also, I have reviewed Spearman v.