Case law

Board of Trustees v. Fishman Realty & Inv. Co.

171 Okla. 351 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1935

Co. v. … City National Bank v. Coatney, 122 Okla. 233 , 253 P. 481 .”

Shell Petroleum Corp. v. State Board of Equalization

170 Okla. 581 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 29, 1935

The rules of law applicable to this situation are: First, a presumption of correctness and fairness in the action of the board (Cooley on Taxation, [4th Ed.] vol. 8, p. 2442; 61 C. J. 611; Southern Surety Co. v. … Carrico v. Crocker, 38 Okla. 440 , 133 P. 181 ; In re McNeal, 35 Okla. 17 , 128 P. 285 .

Board of Com'rs of Hughes County v. Young

171 Okla. 161 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1935

It was said in substance as early as Board of Co. Com’rs v. Watson, 7 Okla. 174 , cited in Board of Co. Com’rs v. … J„ OSBORN, V. O. .1.. and PHELPS and GIBSON, JJ., concur.

Board of Ed., City of Alva v. Fulkerson

72 Okla. 170 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 18, 1919

Bridge, 8 Mass. 275 ; Board of Administrators v. McKowen, 48 La. Ann. 251 , 19 South. 553 , 55 Am. St. Rep. 275 ; Saving Bank v. Hunt, 72 Mo. 597 , 37 Am. Rep. 449 ; Scott County v. Ring, 29 Minn. 401 , 13 N. W. 181 . … In Scott County v.

Banking Board v. Mercantile National Bank

434 P.2d 211 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 10, 1967

See Humphrey Oil Corp. v. Lindsey, Okl., 370 P.2d 296 . … No. 4, etc. v. Purdy, Okl., 322 P.2d 206 ; Humphrey Oil Corp. v.

Ford v. State Board of Equalization

363 P.2d 859 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 5, 1961

This is another appeal from the same order of the State Board of Equalization appealed from in Board of County Commissioners of Canadian County v. State Board of Equalization, Okl., 363 P.2d 242 .

Board of Com'rs of Beaver County v. Culwell

41 Okla. 712 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 24, 1914

Brady v. Frear, County Judge, 21 Okla. 397 , 96 Pac. 628 ; Harris Finley v. Territory of Oklahoma, 12 Okla. 621 , 73 Pac. 273 ; State v. Hooker, 26 Okla. 460 , 109 Pac. 527 ; Moore v.

Board of Education v. State ex rel. Hadden

208 Okla. 504 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 21, 1953

For interesting supporting philosophy, see: 52 Am.Jur. p. 24-25, Amoskeag Savings Bank v. Eppler, 182 Okl. 391 , 77 P.2d 1158 ; In re Seagraves, 4 Okl. 422 , 48 P. 272 ; 52 Am.Jur. p. 7. … J., JOHNSON, V. C. J., and CORN, O’NEAL and BLACKBIRD, JJ., concur. WELCH, DAVISON and WILLIAMS, JJ., dissent.

Johnson v. Board of Com'rs of Logan County

125 Okla. 96 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 7, 1927

In the case of Stump v. … Board of Com’rs of Logan County), involving the identical question presented in the instant case.

Board of Com'rs of Grant County v. Ernest

45 Okla. 725 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 2, 1915

Board of Commissioners v. Wetson, 7 Okla. 174 , 54 Pac. 441 ; Allen v. Board of Commissioners, 28 Okla. 773 , 116 Pac. 175 . … Anderson v. Board of Com’rs, 44 Okla. 164 , 143 Pac. 1145 ; Zeiglar v. Board of Com’rs, 44 Okla. 266 , 144 Pac. 381 ; Orendorff v. Board of Com’rs, 44 Okla. 271 , 144 Pac. 383 ; Huntington et al. v.

Champlin Petroleum Co. v. Board of County Commissioners

526 P.2d 1142 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 1974

The operation of a landfill by the county under the control of the board of health 2 as provided in the Oklahoma Solid Waste Management Act must be for health purposes. In Board of Com’rs v. … British-American Oil Producing Co. v.

Board of Com'rs of Carter Co. v. Landrum

163 Okla. 199 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 14, 1933

Defendant cites Adjustment Realty Co. v. Excise Board of Muskogee County, 141 Okla. 130 , 284 P. 27 , as authority for its contention. … Section 5 of the act was declared unconstitutional by this court in Walker-Taylor Co. v. Board of County Commissioners, 125 *202 Okla. 226, 257 P. 324 .

Foster v. Board of Com'rs of Cimarron County

145 Okla. 210 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 14, 1930

A claim for these amounts was by him presented to1 the board of county commissioners and by them disallowed. An appeal was then taken by him to the district court of said county. … This mortgage, under the holding of this court in State ex rel. v. National Bank of Commerce, 139 Okla. 134 , 281 Pac. 579 , is superior to the right acquired by plaintiff under his tax sale certificate.

Lowden v. Excise Board of Carter County

168 Okla. 616 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 28, 1934

Co. v. … V. ('. X, and McNEILL, OSBORN, BUSBY, and WELCH, XL, concur.

Carrell v. Board of Com'rs of Hughes County

68 Okla. 124 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 16, 1918

The proceeding’s in error in this case involve the identical question this day decided in County Commissioners of Pottawatomie County v. Alexander, 68 Okla. 126 , 172 Pac. 436 .

Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Muskrat

480 P.2d 918 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 9, 1971

Muskrat and Mary Beth Taylor, Trustee, d/b/a Economy Wholesale Company, a partnership, filed their application for a wholesaler’s license with the Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board. … Board denied the application and on appeal to the District Court, Board’s denial of the license was reversed and it was directed to issue the license. Board lodged this appeal. By constitutional mandate, Art.

Walker v. Board of Com'rs of Grant County

44 Okla. 350 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 1, 1914

Privett et al. v. Board of County Commissioners, post, and the briefs in No. 3909, J. D. Orendorff et al. v. Board of County Commissioners, ante, 144 Pac. 383 , as the briefs in this *352 cause. … However, it might not be amiss to say that in the cases of Zeigler v. Board of County Commissioners, ante, 144 Pac. 381 , and Russell v.

Foster v. Board of Com'rs of Custer County

129 Okla. 246 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 21, 1928

In Ferk v. … In the instant case, the board had gone much further than in the case of Eerk v. Hall, supra.

Excise Board of Oklahoma County v. Continental Oil

173 Okla. 577 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 25, 1935

In State ex rel. v. … We held in Gallion v.

Adams v. Board of Com'rs of Garfield County

35 Okla. 440 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 11, 1913

United States v. Wigglesworth, 2 Story, 369 ; Fed. Cas. No. 16,690. In the case of McNally v. Field (C. … .” *444 To the same effect, see Lewis’ Sutherland, Statutory Construction (2d Ed.) sec. 535; Cooley on Taxation (3d Ed.) p. 454, and cases cited; Mayor v. Hartridge, 8 Ga. 30 .