Case law

Mays v. Board of Com'rs of Creek County

164 Okla. 231 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 16, 1933

Such was the holding of this court in Maryland Casualty Co. v. Board of County Commissioners, 128 Okla. 58 , 260 P. 112 . … Powers v.

Yeargain v. Board of Com'rs of Delaware County

90 Okla. 38 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 27, 1923

This court fir the case of Ewing v. … Co. v.

Board of Com'rs of Garfield County v. Huett

35 Okla. 713 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 15, 1913

The case of Harris v. Beavan et al., 74 Ky. (Bush) 254 , appears to be in point. … It is clear that the board of county commissioners had no interest in that suit.

Board of Adjustment of Oklahoma City v. Puckett

353 P.2d 4 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 7, 1960

Puckett’s appeals, both from the Building Superintendent’s decision to the Board of Adjustment, and from said Board’s order to the District Court were predicated on the ground that, under the circumstances, a variance to … WILLIAMS, V. C. J., and HALLEY, JACKSON and IRWIN, JJ., concur. DAVISON, C. J., and WELCH and JOHNSON, JJ., dissent.

Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Lobo

391 P.2d 819 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 21, 1964

In Bird v. … See Phillips v. Mitchell, 68 Okl. 128 , 172 P. 85 .

Board of Com'rs of Tulsa County v. Johnston

192 Okla. 203 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1942

Jackson v. Board of County Com’rs, Muskogee Co., 133 Okla. 263 , 271 P. 1041 . This rule has its foundation in Board of County Com’rs of Washita Co. v. Brett, 32 Okla. 853 , 124 P. 57 . See, also, Anderson v. … We have pointed out that in Board of County Com’rs of Grant County v.

Excise Board of Stephens County v. Lowden

184 Okla. 563 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 4, 1939

WELCH, V. C. J. This case involves the following protest: ‘•'The excise board allocated 5.00 mills to this district and the district voted 10.00 mills additional making a total of 15.00 mills. … Co., 170 Okla. 123 , 39 P.2d 99 ; Bristow Battery Co. v. Payne, 123 Okla. 137 , 252 P. 423 ; Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v.

Board of Com'rs of Garfield County v. Sims

166 Okla. 298 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 21, 1933

Sims, hereinafter called claimant, was employed by the board of county, commissioners of Garfield county, Okla., hereinafter called petitioner, whose insurance was carried by the Commercial Casualty Insurance Company. … Therefore, under the authority of Mashburn v. City of Grandfield, 142 Okla. 247 , 286 P. 789 ; Barr v. Burrus, 156 Okla. 137 , 9 P. (2d) 924 ; Ponca City v. Grimes, 144 Okla. 31 , 288 P. 951 , and City of Muskogee v.

Board of Com'rs v. A. C. Davis & Sons

184 Okla. 258 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 24, 1939

Gordon v. Conner (1938) 183 Okla. 82 , 80 P.2d 322 . … Tonini & Bramblett v. Board of County Com’rs, supra. The case of Foster v. Board of County Com’rs of Custer County (1928) 129 Okla. 246 , 264 P. 615 , cited by plaintiff in error, is not in point.

DiMauro v. Oklahoma State Board of Medical Examiners

769 P.2d 759 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 28, 1989

State Bd., etc. v. Naifeh, 598 P.2d 225 (Okla.1979). I. … Davis v. State Board of Medical Examiners, 74 P.2d 610 (Okla.1937).

Morley v. State Ex Rel. Board of Ed.

171 Okla. 46 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 11, 1934

Board of Ed. v. Excise Board of Payne Co., 155 Okla. 227 , 7 P. (2d) 473 ; Board of Education v. Excise Board of Logan County, 155 Okla. 214 , 8 P. (2d) 683 . See, also, section 12657, O. S. 1931; Stockton v. … Coggeshall & Co. v.

Shinn v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

397 P.2d 157 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 17, 1964

S.Supp.1959 § 528, the Board has the authority to revoke or suspend any license for •such period as the Board deems appropriate, if the Board finds that the licensee has wilfully violated any of the provisions of the Act. … The court did not err in affirming the order of the Board.

Board of Com'rs v. Southwest Natural Gas Co.

192 Okla. 594 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 8, 1943

Our attention is called to Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co., 182 Okla. 527 , 78 P. 2d 800 ; Oklahoma Natural Gas Corp. v. City of Enid, 179 Okla. 283 , 65 P. 2d 440 . … Whiting v. Sullivan, 7 Mass. 107 ; Earle v. Coburn, 130 Mass. 596 ; Boston Ice Co. v. Potter, 123 Mass. 28 , 25 Am. Rep. 9 ; Jewett v. Somerset, 1 Me.

McCasland v. Board of Com'rs of Adair County

126 Okla. 103 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 26, 1927

The resolution of the board of county commissioners not being contained in the record, we do not know the manner, nor the time when the final decision of the board of county commissioners was made. See Mahr v. … In Bradford v.

Graves v. Board of Com'rs of Cimarron County

170 Okla. 282 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 9, 1934

S. 3931; Fairbanks-Morse Co. v. City of Geary, supra; Lacy v. Board of Education, supra; Myers v. Independent School District, 104 Okla. 51 , 230 P. 498 ; Board of Commissioners of McCurtain County v. … O’Neil Engineering Co. v. Town of Ryan, 32 Okla. 738 , 324 P. 19 ; Myers v. School District, supra; Eaton v. St. L.-S. F. R. R. Co., 122 Okla. 143 , 251 P. 1032 ; Board of Commissioners of McCurtain County v.

Minnetonka Lumber v. Board of Educ. of Sapulpa

41 Okla. 541 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 28, 1914

Co. v. Board of Education of the City of Shawnee et al., 39 Okla. 716 , 136 Pac. 595 ; Hutchinson v. Krueger et al., 34 Okla. 23 , 124 Pac. 591 , 41 L. R. A. (N. S.) 315.

Schuman v. Board of Com'rs of McIntosh Co.

163 Okla. 118 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 18, 1933

The decision in Young v. Board of Com' rs, supra, is probably a reason why the Legislature added the limitation provision to the act. … In Scott v. Morris. Co.

Ross v. Board of Trustees, Etc.

632 P.2d 391 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 21, 1981

Subsequently, he applied for benefits before the Board of Trustees of the Employee Retirement System [Board]. The Board denied his application. … V, Ch. 2, § 2.277, 1 Ross should be awarded a pension beginning on his sixtieth birthday.

Board of Ed., City of Sapulpa v. Broadwell

117 Okla. 1 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 8, 1925

Beatty v. Armstrong, 95 Okla. 109 , 218 Pac. 516 ; Garr v. Minnick, 100 Okla. 109 , 228 Pac. 481 ; Langford v, Oklahoma State Bank, 109 Okla. 82 , 234 Pac. 744 . … ' interest, citing Independent School Dist. v.

Board of Com'rs of Marshall County v. Lacy

161 Okla. 138 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 29, 1932

This question has been heretofore decided adverse to petitioner’s contention by this court, in Board of Com’rs of Pawnee County v. … This court held in Whiteneck, Adm’x, v. Board of Commissioners of Woods County, 89 Okla. 52 . 213 P.