Case law

Mid-Continent Building Co. v. Board of Equalization

184 Okla. 525 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 17, 1939

Klick v. Wittmer, 50 Mont. 22 , 144 P. 648 ; Campbell v. Hunt, 18 Ariz. 442 , 162 P. 882 ; Barnhill v. Thompson, 122 N. C. 493 , 29 S. E. 720 ; Shell v. Cousins, 77 Va. 328 ; Attorney General ex rel. Dust v. … WELCH, V. C. J., and DAVISON and DANNER, JJ„ absent.

Russell v. Board of Com'rs of Grant County

44 Okla. 301 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 24, 1914

not within the ordinary duties of county treasurer, but were necessary, and that the county received the benefit thereof, and should be held liable therefor, oth these questions were decided in a companion case, Zeiglar v. … was taken from the action of the board in allowing the same. “2.

Burford v. Board of Com'rs of Lincoln County

63 Okla. 42 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 9, 1917

Gibbons v. Brittenum, 56 Miss. 249 ; State ex rel. Excelsior v. District Court, 107 Minn. 437 , 120 N. W. 894 ; State v. Heridorn, 74 Mo. 410 ; Endlich on Int. of Stat. see. 183. … Finley v. Combs, 12 Okla. 497 , 71 Pac. 625 ; Ferguson v.

Stegall v. Excise Board of Pottawatomie County

183 Okla. 44 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 24, 1938

S. 1931, passed a resolution setting up the item in the budget and the excise board approved it. A “biennial audit” had been made the previous year under the provisions of chapter 40, S. L. 1933. … The Court of Tax Review said: “We feel that it is a matter within the sound discretion of the board of county commissioners as to whether or not they have audits made more frequently than every other year.

Board of County Com'rs v. State Industrial Commission

177 Okla. 645 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 20, 1936

Barnett, 65 Okla. 189 , 166 P. 207 ; Marker, Adm’r, v. Gillam, 80 Okla. 259 , 196 P. 126 ; Jones v. Gallagher, 64 Okla. 41 , 166 P. 204 ; Bristow v. … As examples thereof may be cited Ward v. Beatrice Creamery Co., 117 Okla. 31 , 245 P. 570 ; State ex rel. v. Green, 147 Okla. 119 , 294 P. 787 ; Olentine v. Calloway, supra, and Oklahoma Ry. Co. v.

Board of Comrs. Washita Co. v. Burrow

8 Okla. 212 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 11, 1899

Hence, this case comes clearly within the rule laid down in the case of Board v. Moon, this volume, p. 205, and Broad v. Wright, Id. 190.

Faulk v. Board of Com'rs of Marshall County

40 Okla. 705 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 28, 1914

In support of their contention, they rely upon the case of North et al. v. McMahan, 26 Okla. 502 , 110 Pac. 1115 . … On the same point here involved, Chief Justice Turner, in speaking for the court, said in North et al. v.

Little v. County Exclse Board of Marshall County

161 Okla. 40 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 13, 1932

Sneed v. Tippett, 114 Okla. 173 , 245 P. 40 . Since the increasing of any item of an estimate by the excise board is not required by the statute, this court cannot require such an increase to be made by mandamus. … the estimate made by the board of counts' commissioners to the excise board under the provisions of section 9695, C.

Ashton v. Board of Com'rs of Murray County

58 Okla. 259 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 6, 1916

One of the phases of the case has been before this court before (Ashton v. Board of County Commissioners of Murray County et al., 45 Okla. 731 , 147 Pac. 305 ). … (Overstreet et al. v. Citizens’ Bank, 12 Okla. 383 , 72 Pac. 379 ; Schock v. Fish, 45 Okla. 12 , 144 Pac. 584 ; Checote v. Berryhill, 48 Okla. 696 , 150 Pac. 679 .)

Phillips v. North, Board of County Com'rs.

36 Okla. 257 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 26, 1912

Phillips, against the board of county commissioners of Tulsa county, for an order restraining said defendants, as a board of county commissioners of said county, from entering into any contract for the construction of the … wit, lot 4 and the south 50 feet of lot 5, block 149, in *258 the city of Tulsa, because of an alleged defect in title in said property, and prayed for temporary restraining order pending an appeal from an order of the board

Lairmore v. Board of Com'rs of Okmulgee County

200 Okla. 436 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 29, 1948

In the case of Parkinson v. … The language used in the case of Bostick v.

Board of Examiners in Veterinary Medicine v. Tubbs

307 P.2d 830 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 22, 1957

As the court said of the Kentucky State Board of Dental Examiners, with reference to enforcement of the Act regulating the practice of dentistry involved in Kentucky State Board of Dental Examiners v. … J., CORN, V. C. J., and JOHNSON and WILLIAMS, JJ., dissent.

State Ex Rel. Montgomery v. State Election Board

29 Okla. 31 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 9, 1911

Stearns, Mayor, et al. v. State ex rel., 23 Okla. 462, 100 Pac. 909 . … This court said in the case of Grove v.

Levy Bros. v. Board of Com'rs, Noble Co.

101 Okla. 241 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 8, 1924

The case of Cleveland National Bank v. … A near approach is the case of Lindsey v. Boone County, 92 Iowa, 86 .

State Ex Rel. Fulton v. State Election Board

168 Okla. 446 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 6, 1934

As we have said in Meads v. … CULLISON, V. C. .T., and SWINDALL, ANDREWS, McNEILL, OSBORN, and BUSBY, JX,' concur. RILEY, O. X, dissents. WELCH, X, absent.

Board of Trustees v. Fishman Realty & Inv. Co.

171 Okla. 351 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1935

Co. v. … City National Bank v. Coatney, 122 Okla. 233 , 253 P. 481 .”

Hoover v. Board of Com'rs of Garvin County

157 Okla. 225 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 17, 1932

Smith v. Board of Commissioners, 26 Okla. 819 , 110 B. 669 ; Smith v. Kaufman & Co., 8 Okla. 568 , 41 P. 722 . … Prince v. Wild Horse Drainage District No. 1, 145 Okla. 185 , 292 P. 42 .

Board of Com'rs of Grant County v. Ernest

45 Okla. 725 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 2, 1915

Board of Commissioners v. Wetson, 7 Okla. 174 , 54 Pac. 441 ; Allen v. Board of Commissioners, 28 Okla. 773 , 116 Pac. 175 . … Anderson v. Board of Com’rs, 44 Okla. 164 , 143 Pac. 1145 ; Zeiglar v. Board of Com’rs, 44 Okla. 266 , 144 Pac. 381 ; Orendorff v. Board of Com’rs, 44 Okla. 271 , 144 Pac. 383 ; Huntington et al. v.

Board of Com'rs of Garfield County v. Sims

166 Okla. 298 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 21, 1933

Sims, hereinafter called claimant, was employed by the board of county, commissioners of Garfield county, Okla., hereinafter called petitioner, whose insurance was carried by the Commercial Casualty Insurance Company. … Therefore, under the authority of Mashburn v. City of Grandfield, 142 Okla. 247 , 286 P. 789 ; Barr v. Burrus, 156 Okla. 137 , 9 P. (2d) 924 ; Ponca City v. Grimes, 144 Okla. 31 , 288 P. 951 , and City of Muskogee v.

Board of Com'rs v. A. C. Davis & Sons

184 Okla. 258 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 24, 1939

Gordon v. Conner (1938) 183 Okla. 82 , 80 P.2d 322 . … Tonini & Bramblett v. Board of County Com’rs, supra. The case of Foster v. Board of County Com’rs of Custer County (1928) 129 Okla. 246 , 264 P. 615 , cited by plaintiff in error, is not in point.