Case law

Board of Com'rs v. Enid Springs Sanitarium & Hospital

116 Okla. 249 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 2, 1926

Board of County Commissioners v. Seawell, 3 Okla. 281 , 41 Pac. 592 ; Butler v. Board of County Commissioners, 57 Okla. 748 ; 157 Pac. 912 ; Nolan v. … Board of County Commissioners, 51 Okla. 320 , 152 Pac. 63 ; Board of County Commissioners v. Tulsa Camera Record Co., 103 Okla. 35 , 228 Pac. 1103 .

Chickasaw Lumber Co. v. Board of Com'rs

173 Okla. 197 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 4, 1935

Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County, 125 Okla. 226 , 257 P. 324 ; Board of County Commissioners of Carter County v. Landrum, 163 Okla. 199 , 21 P. (2d) 736 . … Board of County Commissioners of Washington County, 171 Okla. 302 , 42 P. *198 (2d) 533. We see no reason for departing from tire rule announced therein. Judgment affirmed. McNEILL, O. J., OSBORN, V. O.

Oklahoma Farm Bureau v. State Board of Education

444 P.2d 182 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 2, 1968

Chapel v. … Upon authority of Oliver v.

Hughes v. Board of Com'rs of Oklahoma County

50 Okla. 410 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 8, 1915

Arnold, 10 Kan. 102 ; Walker v. Fleming, 37 Kan. 171 , 14 Pac. 470 ; Board of Education v. … Fox, 22 Me. 341 ; Allegan v. Chaddock, 119 Mich. 688 , 78 N. W. 892 ; Marney v. State, 13 Mo. 7 ; Board of Education v. Quick, 99 N. Y. 138 , 1 N. E. 533 ; State v. Grizzard, 117 N. C. 105 , 23 S. E. 93 ; Dawson v.

Board of Equalization v. Tulsa Pythian Benevolent Ass'n

195 Okla. 458 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 22, 1945

Under these facts it is apparent that the questions here presented are governed by the rule of Oklahoma County v.

Board Com'rs Leflore Cty. v. Central Nat.

171 Okla. 42 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 5, 1935

The question, however, appears to be conclusively settled against the contention of plaintiffs in error in Comstock v. City of Commerce, 100 Okla. 302 , 229 P. 167 . … S. 1931, warrants may be issued to the amount of the estimate made and approved by the excise board for the current fiscal year.

United Airlines, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization

789 P.2d 1305 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 27, 1990

See: April v. City of Broken Arrow, Okl., 775 P.2d 1347 (1989); Mattoon v. City of Norman, Okl., 617 P.2d 1347 (1980); Lincoln Income Life Insurance Co. v. Wood, Okl., 556 P.2d 602 (1976); Martin v. Harrah Indep. … Board of Education, Vici Public Schools, Indep. School Dist. No. I-5, Dewey County v. Morris, Okl., 656 P.2d 258, 261 (1982); Magnolia Pipe Line Co. v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, 196 Okl. 633 , 167 P.2d 884 (1946).

Weston v. Board of Governors of State Bar

177 Okla. 467 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 22, 1936

Plaintiff cites State Bar of California v. … If he was not a member of the State Bar during his incumbency in office, and if the Board of Governors could not have proceeded against him during hit!

Ashton v. Board of Com'rs of Murray Co.

45 Okla. 731 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 2, 1915

School District, 13 Okla. 285 , 74 Pac. 110 ; Marlow v. School District, 29 Okla. 304 , 116 Pac. 797 ; Hamman v. Board, 25 Okla. 372 , 107 Pac. 646 , 30 L. R. A. (N. S.) 214. … In Nevil v.

Board of Com'rs of Tulsa County v. Sutton

185 Okla. 665 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 12, 1939

Kramer v. Smith, 23 Okla. 381 , 100 P. 532 ; Blanchard v. Reed, 67 Okla. 137 , 168 P. 664 ; Clewell v. Cottle, 99 Okla. 84 , 225 P. 946 ; Sires v. Parriott, 106 Okla. 244 . 233 P. 748 ; Elerick v. … The eases referred to are Weeks v. Merkle, 6 Okla. 714 , 52 P. 929 ; Frazier v. Prince, 8 Okla. 253 , 58 P. 751 ; Lowenstein v. Sexton, 18 Okla. 322 , 90 P. 410 : Eldridge v. Robertson, 19 Okla. 165 , 92 P. 156 .

Board of Com'rs of Kingfisher County v. Vahlberg

198 Okla. 527 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 1, 1947

See Orth & Bro. v. Board of Public Education, 272 Pa. 411 , 116 Atl. 366 , 20 A.L.R. 1352 , and annotation. … In Board of County Commissioners v. A. C.

Bass v. Board of Com'rs of Lincoln County

97 Okla. 94 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 22, 1924

The census of 1920 was taken as of the 15th day of April, 1920, and showed a population of 33,406 for Lincoln county, and the plaintiff claims this sitúa-' ti on brings him within the rules applied in the eases of Harper v. … Board of County Commissioners, 54 Okla. 545 , 149 Pac. 1102 ; and Board of County Commissioners v. Williams, 38 Okla. 738 , 135 Pac. 420 .

Board of Com'rs of Kingfisher County v. Lemley

23 Okla. 306 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 23, 1909

It has been held by this court in at least three cases (Humphrey v. Hunt, 9 Okla. 196 , 59 Pac. 971 , Wedd v. Gates et al., 15 Okla. 602 , 82 Pac. 808 , and Strange v. … Chief Justice Burford, in Outcalt v.

Brownlee v. Board of Com'rs of Kingfisher County

148 Okla. 280 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 28, 1931

CLARK, V. C. J. Plaintiff in error filed his suit in Kingfisher county against defendant in error, board of county commissioners of Kingfisher county, to recover an attorney fee and expenses. … Plaintiff alleged that on October 21, 1927, the board of county commissioners of Kingfisher county presented an accusation for removal from office against R. F.

Flower Hospital, Inc. v. Board of Equalization

191 Okla. 218 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 13, 1942

Bonaparte, 174 Okla. 316 , 50 P. 2d 404 ; First National Bank & Trust Co. v. Bonaparte, 174 Okla. 315 , 50 P. 2d 407 ; Blake, Co. Treas., et al. v. Metz, 136 Okla. 146 , 276 P. 762 ; Blake v. … The appeal is dismissed and the cause is remanded, with directions to dismiss. *222 CORN, V. C. J., and OSBORN, BAY-LESS, GIBSON, and HURST, JJ., concur. WELCH, C. J., dissents. DAVISON and ARNOLD, JJ., absent.

Parker v. Board of Com'rs of Okmulgee County

187 Okla. 308 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 21, 1940

Plaintiff cites Beck v. … Board of County Commissioners of Okmulgee County, 187 Okla. 223 , 102 P. 2d 148 , decided March 5, 1940.

Ewing v. Board of Commissioners of Ellis County

53 Okla. 250 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 14, 1916

See, also, Brittan v. Oakland Bank of Savings, 124 Cal. 282 , 57 Pac. 74 , 71 Am. St. Rep. 58 . In Hitchcock v. Galveston, 96 U. S. 341 , 24 L. Ed. 659 , the court, quoting approvingly from State Board of Agriculture v. … In Lowe et al. v.

Board of Com'rs of Alfalfa Co. v. Ferguson

65 Okla. 311 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 12, 1917

Laws 1910, provides: “The district court may make a final judgment and cause the same to be executed, or may send the same back to the board with an order how to proceed, and require said board of county commissioners to … In Avery v.

Foster v. Board of Com'rs of Marshall County

144 Okla. 14 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 10, 1930

Cadman v. Smith, 15 Okla. 633 , 85 Pac. 346 ; Smith v. Bostaph, 103 Okla. 258 , 229 Pac. 1041 ; Sitton v. Hernstadt, 106 Okla. 140 , 233 Pac. 676 . … ease showing that the county commissioners or the excise board created a fund to take care of such claims, as is provided in the statute which deals with erroneous assessments.

Robinson v. Board of Com'rs of Marshall County

151 Okla. 100 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 7, 1931

A question almost identical with the case at bar was considered by this court in the case of Rodolph v. Board of Com’rs of Tulsa County, 122 Okla. 120 , 251 Pac. 740 . … Board of Commissioners of Oklahoma County v. Beatty, 67 Okla. 281 , 171 Pac. 34 ; Key v. Donnell, 107 Okla. 157 , 231 Pac. 546 ; White v. Infield, 122 Okla. 4 , 250 Pac. 81 ; Diehl v.