Case law

Board of Examiners of Veterinary Medicine v. Mohr

485 P.2d 235 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 18, 1971

Oklahoma State Board of Embalmers etc. v. … Oklahoma State Board of Embalmers, etc. v.

Allen v. Board of Com'rs of Logan County

131 Okla. 41 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 29, 1928

The board is limited in its powers to those specially granted by statute. Allen v. Board of Commissioners of Pittsburg County, 28 Okla. 773 , 116 Pac. 175 ; Garvin County v. … Kellogg v. School District No. 10. Comanche County, 13 Okla. 286 , 74 Pac. 110 ; Harlow v. Board of Commissioners of Payne County. 33 Okla. 353 , 125 Pac. 449 ; Ashton v.

Rutledge v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

517 P.2d 800 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 11, 1973

In State v. Parham, Okl., 412 P.2d 142 , we recognize the broad legal delegation of authority granted to the ABC Board when we said: “1. … Edwards v. Hanna Lumber Co., 415 P.2d 980 (Okl. 1966). Judgment affirmed as modified. DAVISON, C. J., WILLIAMS, V. C. J., and IRWIN, BERRY, LAVENDER and DOOLIN, JJ., concur. HODGES, BARNES and SIMMS, JJ., concur. .

Board of Com'rs of Atoka Co. v. Cypert

65 Okla. 168 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 22, 1917

Among such cases may be named the following: Huddleston v. Board, 8 Okla. 614 , 58 Pac. 749 ; Board of Commissioners of Garfield County v Bebb et al., 52 Okla. 18 , 152 Pac. 595 ; Smith v. … With the single exception of the 'Supreme Court of Nebraska (Brown v.

Gray v. State ex rel. State Election Board

962 P.2d 1 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 28, 1998

Petitioner now challenges the authority of the Board to enforce this provision and the Board’s construction of the statute. ¶ 5 The power and authority of the Board were reviewed in Brickell v. … Hill v. Board of Education, 944 P.2d 930, 933 (Okla.1997). ¶ 12 Section 1404 does not apply to the instant controversy. Because this is so, this Court need not address the Board’s construction of that statute.

Board of Com'rs of Coal County v. Mathews

147 Okla. 296 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 17, 1931

(Herndon v. Excise Board of Garfield County, 147 Okla. 126 , 295 Pac. 223 .) … As was said in the case of Board of Commissioners of Delaware County v.

Board of Ed. of Oklahoma City v. Thurman

121 Okla. 108 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 19, 1926

In the case of Board of County Com’rs of Logan County v. … Arnold v. Smith, 80 Ind. 417 ; Dubois v. Board of Com’rs of Lake County (Ind. App.) 37 N. E. 1056 .

Board of Com'rs of Muskogee County v. Hart

29 Okla. 693 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 14, 1911

Kane v. Johnson, Comptroller (Mo.) 25 S. … Kane v. Johnson, 123 Mo. 43 , 27 S. W. 339 .

Herndon v. Board of Com'rs of Pontotoc County

158 Okla. 14 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 3, 1932

In said special demurrer defendant raised the statute of limitations as against plaintiff’s cause of action, and in support of defendant’s contention cites the ease of Board of County Commissioners of Woodward County v. … In the case of Board of County Commissioners of Woodward County v. Willett, supra, this court had under consideration the difference between a private and a public right of a county or municipality.

Federal Tax Co. v. Board of Com'rs

198 Okla. 390 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 7, 1947

Foster v. Board of Com’rs. of Marshall County, 144 Okla. 14 , 289 P. 349 , without citing authority, diverged from this rule, but in Jepeway v. … Roth v. Gabbert, 123 Mo. 21 , 27 S.W. 528 .

Western Terra Cotta Co. v. Board of Education

39 Okla. 716 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 18, 1913

The defendant Warren-Smith Hardware Company filed its answer and cross-petition, also claiming and asserting a lien upon the premises owned by the said defendant board of education. … The same contention was urged in Hutchinson v. Krueger et al., 34 Okla. 23 , 124 Pac, 591 , 41 L. R. A. (N. S.) 315.

Board of Com'rs of Woodward County v. Thyfault

43 Okla. 82 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 9, 1914

Overstreet v. City Bank, 12 Okla. 383 , 72 Pac. 379 ; Holt v. Murphy, 15 Okla. 12 , 79 Pac. 275 ; Horn v. Gibson, 24 Okla. 481 , 103 Pac. 563 . … Lieber v. People, 33 Colo. 493 , 81 Pac. 270 ; 13 Cyc. 493; Pollard v. Rebman, 162 Cal. 633 , 124 Pac. 239 .

Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Board of Com'rs

200 Okla. 240 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 20, 1948

The plaintiff contends: (1) that this court, in School District No. 25 v. … Martin v. Carman, 183 Okla. 177 , 80 P. 2d 561 ; Russett School District v. Askew, 193 Okla. 102 , 141 P. 2d 575 .

Board Com'rs Leflore Cty. v. Central Nat.

171 Okla. 42 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 5, 1935

The question, however, appears to be conclusively settled against the contention of plaintiffs in error in Comstock v. City of Commerce, 100 Okla. 302 , 229 P. 167 . … S. 1931, warrants may be issued to the amount of the estimate made and approved by the excise board for the current fiscal year.

Board of Adjustment of Oklahoma City v. Shanbour

435 P.2d 569 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 19, 1967

Board of Adjustment of City of Tulsa v. Shore, 207 Okl. 381 , 249 P.2d 1011 ; Application of Shadid, supra; Anderson-Kerr v. Van Meter, 162 Okl. 176 , 19 P.2d 1068 . … To support their contention, plaintiffs in error cite Lee v. Board of Adjustment, 226 N.C. 107 , 37 S.E. 2d 128 , 168 A.L.R. 1 , and Minney v. City of Azusa, 164 Cal.App.2d 12 , 330 P.2d 255 .

Board of Com'rs v. Enid Springs Sanitarium & Hospital

116 Okla. 249 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 2, 1926

Board of County Commissioners v. Seawell, 3 Okla. 281 , 41 Pac. 592 ; Butler v. Board of County Commissioners, 57 Okla. 748 ; 157 Pac. 912 ; Nolan v. … Board of County Commissioners, 51 Okla. 320 , 152 Pac. 63 ; Board of County Commissioners v. Tulsa Camera Record Co., 103 Okla. 35 , 228 Pac. 1103 .

School Dist. No. 24 of Rogers Co. v. Brown

54 Okla. 632 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 11, 1916

There is, however, a certificate of the clerk of the court, who certifies: “That the above and foregoing is a true and complete copy of the case-made in case No. 415, Civil, Estella Brown v.

Oklahoma Farm Bureau v. State Board of Education

444 P.2d 182 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 2, 1968

Chapel v. … Upon authority of Oliver v.

John A. Brown Co. v. Oklahoma City General Hospital

187 Okla. 257 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 7, 1940

Brown Company is affirmed and as to Standard Accident Insurance Company is reversed and remanded, with directions to enter judgment in favor of said defendant. Affirmed in part and reversed in part, with directions. … J., WELCH, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, and HURST, JJ., concur.

Robinson v. City of Bartlesville Board of Education

700 P.2d 1013 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 14, 1985

See Snyder v. State Dept. of Health & Mental HYG.; 40 Md.App. 364 , 391 A.2d 863 (1978); Hines v. City of Nevada, 150 Iowa 620 , 130 N.W. 181 (1911). 10 . See Tango v. … City of New Haven, 173 Conn. 203 , 377 A.2d 284 (1977); Lostumbo v. Board of Ed. of City of Norwalk, 36 Conn.Sup. 293 , 418 A.2d 949 (1980); Baran v.