Case law

Lowden v. Excise Board of Beckham County

172 Okla. 154 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 7, 1935

Co. v. … Excise Board of Washington County, 168 Okla. 619 , 35 P. (2d) 274 , are determinative of the question on appeal, and in said stipulation it is agreed that as to item Y of the protest, involving the general fund of school

Board of Equalization v. Broadway Development Co.

178 Okla. 266 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 1, 1936

Nichols, Inc., v. Bonaparte, 176 Okla. 100 , 54 P. (2d) 1042 , when considering an assessment of this character, we said that the same was “in the nature of an original or primary assessment.” … State v. Holcomb, 81 Kan. 879 , 106 P. 1030 , 28 L. R. A. (N. S.) 251. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. McNEILL, o. j., and BUSBY, WELCH,’ PHELPS, and CORN, JJ., concur. OSBORN, Y. O.

Board of Com'rs, Comanche Co. v. Fain

66 Okla. 13 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 24, 1917

The Criminal Court of Appeals of this state, in Hisaw v. State, 13 Okla. … This court, also, in the case of Johnston v. Board of Commissioners of Murray County, 53 Okla. 693 , 158 Pac. 164 , said: “By sections 1598 and 6860, Comp. Laws 1909 (Rev.

Board of Comm'rs Kingfisher v. Guarantee State Bank

27 Okla. 736 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 10, 1911

The facts out of which, this proceeding grows are as follows: The board of county commissioners of Kingfisher county, acting as the board of equalization of that county, raised the return statements of the value of the property … That court set aside the order of the board of equalization and assessed the property of defendants in error at an amount less than that fixed by the board of equalization.

Whiteneck v. Board of Commissioners of Woods County

89 Okla. 52 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 13, 1923

This court in the case of Board of Com’rs of Pawnee county v. … In James v.

Broadwell v. Board of Com'rs of Bryan Co.

88 Okla. 147 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 2, 1922

Parker v. Board of Com’rs of Tillman Co., 41 Okla. 723 , 139 Pac. 891 . See, also, Smith v. Board of Com’rs of Garvin County, 62 Okla. 120 , 162 Pac. 463 . … See Board of Com’rs of Atoka Co. v. Cypert, 65 Okla. 168 , 166 Pac. 195 . The plaintiff, however, sought to appeal.

Rice v. State Board of Medical Examiners

208 Okla. 440 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 12, 1953

. * * *” One of the earliest applications of such principle in this jurisdiction may be observed in our early decision in Gillespie v. State (1911) 5 Okla. Cr. 546 , 115 P. 620 , 35 L.R.A. (N.S.) 1171, Ann. … The court’s opinion quoted from McKnight v.

Board of County Com'rs v. Board of Education

141 Okla. 55 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 7, 1930

No. 7, Creek Co., v. Board of Co. Com’rs, 135 Okla. 1 , 275 Pac. 292 ; Board of Co. Com’rs, Carter Co., v. School Dist. No. 71, Carter Co., 135 Okla. 248 , 275 Pac. 302 ; Board of Co. Com’rs, Carter Co., v. School Dist. … Board Education, City of Sapulpa, v. Bd. Co.

Wade v. Board of Com'rs of Harmon County

161 Okla. 245 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 1, 1932

The identical question here involved was before the court in the case of Robison v. Board of Com’rs of Marshall County, 151 Okla. 100 , 1 P. (2d) 660 . … State ex rel. v. Cease, 28 Okla. 271 , 114 P. 251 ; Threadgill v. Cross, 26 Okla. 403 . 109 P. 558 ; Wilds v. Williams (Mo.) 34 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1060, 133 S. W. 1 .

Associated Industries of Oklahoma v. State Insurance Board

173 Okla. 41 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 4, 1935

See Small v. Comer, 171 Okla. 418 , 43 P. (2d) 716 , for some discussion of exxiert testimony and expert witnesses. … We, therefore, conclude that the petition of protestante to vacate or annul the order of the State Insurance Board should be denied, and it is so ordered. McNEIBL, O. J., OSBORN, V. O.

Parker v. Board of Com'rs of Tillman County

41 Okla. 723 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 24, 1914

v. … In Hayes v.

Brown v. Butler State Bank

74 Okla. 15 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 3, 1918

court upon the judgment or order of the county court, directing the garnishee to pay the money into court, and upon the .trial of said action the justice rendered judgment in favor of the bank against Brown, from which Brown … Bell-Wayland Oo. v. Nixon, 57 Okla. 138 , 156 Pac. 1195 . It might not be amiss to cite secs. 5466, 5467, It. L. 1910, which prescribe the method of appealing from the justice of the peace court in civil actions.

City of Bethany v. Public Employees Relations Board

66 O.B.A.J. 3071 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 3, 1995

(the PERB/Board). … See, Board of Police Comm’rs v.

Barrett v. Board of Com'rs of Tulsa County

185 Okla. 111 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 7, 1939

We decline to depart from our views as expressed in Board of County Commissioners v. Kiowa National Bank, supra. … Hancock v. Muskogee, 250 U. S. 454 , 63 L. Ed. 1081 , 39 S. Ct. 528 ; Hagar v. Reclamation District, 111 U. S. 701 , 4 S. Ct. 663 , 28 L. Ed. 569 ; Davidson v. Board of Administrators of New Orleans, 96 U. S. 97 , 24 L.

Darst v. County Election Board of Craig County

194 Okla. 469 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 10, 1944

Appellant relies strongly upon Swindall v. State Election Board, 168 Okla. 97 , 32 P. 2d 691 . The case is not in point. … The appellant also calls our attention to Hart v. Jordan, 168 Cal. 321 , 143 P. 537 , Sutphen v. Enking, 39 Idaho, 728 , 230 P. 38 , Morrow v. Wipf, 22 S. D. 146, 115 N. W. 1121 , and Bell v. Hill, 123 Tex. 531 , 74 S.

Green v. Board of Com'rs of Lincoln County

126 Okla. 300 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 26, 1927

S. 1921, and chapter 48 of the Session Laws of 1924 — and particularly section 23 thereof — together with Mayberry v. Gaddis, 88 Okla. 286 , 213 Pac. 316 , and Franklin v. … of County Commissioners v.

First National Bank v. Oklahoma Savings & Loan Board

569 P.2d 993 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 27, 1977

In Schroeder v. … Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. Chez, 527 P.2d 165, 167 (Okl.1974); In re Alteration of School District Boundaries of Dist. No. 42, 187 Okl. 686 , 105 P.2d 536 (1940). 15 . Brown v.

Hazlett v. Board of Com'rs of Muskogee County

168 Okla. 290 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 22, 1934

“V. … Board of Com’rs of Seminole County v. Barker, 119 Okla. 206 , 249 P. 296 ; Howard v. Rose Township, 37 Okla. 153 , 13l P. 683; Board of Com’rs of Stephens County v. Hancock, 96 Okla. 238 , 221 p. 429; Welker v.

State Ex Rel. Cloud v. State Election Board

169 Okla. 363 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 25, 1934

Cloud, hereinafter referred to as relator, against the State Election Board and V. L. Kiker, hereinafter referred to as respondents. … Ed. 366 ; Knote v. United States, 95 U. S. 149 , 24 L. Ed. 442 ; Young v. Young, 61 Tex. 191 ; State v. Page. 60 Kan. 664 , 57 P. 514 .” The above has been adhered to in Stewart v. State, 11 Okla.

Board of Com'rs of Grady Co. v. Hammerly

85 Okla. 53 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 18, 1921

To this petition the defendants the board of county commissioners and the city of Chickasha demurred, which demurrer was by the court overruled and exceptions saved. The defendant A. V. … V. Foster and the board of county commissioners and the city of Chickasha severally excepted and exceptions allowed. “Will Linn, District Judge.” The act in question is follows .