Case law

Herd v. the United States.

13 Okla. 512 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 12, 1904

S. v. Logan, 105 Fed. 240 . … Joe Brown and Dan Brown.

Bradbury v. Oklahoma State Board of Chiropody

490 P.2d 246 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 26, 1971

The license shall be renewed by the Board upon the payment of the delinquent annual renewal fee, without penalty, between July 1 and September 30 immediately following, if, and only if, the licensee first satisfies the Board … City of Shawnee v. Taylor, 191 Okl. 687 , 132 P.2d 950 , and Black v. Geissler, 58 Okl. 335 , 159 P. 1124 .

City of Bethany v. Public Employees Relations Board

66 O.B.A.J. 3071 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 3, 1995

(the PERB/Board). … See, Board of Police Comm’rs v.

Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. v. Board of Ed.

201 Okla. 250 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 19, 1948

Co. v. … Co. v. Lively, supra, and Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v.

City of Enid v. Public Employees Relations Board

133 P.3d 281 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 14, 2006

Manley v. Brown, 1999 OK 79, ¶ 22, n. 30 , 989 P.2d 448, 456, n. 30 . … Hatfield v. Garnett, 1915 OK 70, ¶ 18 , 146 P. 24 ; Board of County Commissioners v. Beaty, 1918 OK 89, ¶ 7 , 171 P. 34 ; Board of Commissioners of Grady County v. Hammerly, 1921 OK 356, ¶ 25 , 204 P. 445 ; Key v.

DRUMMOND v. OKLAHOMA STATEWIDE VIRTUAL CHARTER SCHOOL BOARD

2024 OK 53 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 25, 2024

OSCN Found Document:DRUMMOND v. OKLAHOMA STATEWIDE VIRTUAL CHARTER SCHOOL BOARD Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print Only DRUMMOND v. … The Charter School Board and St. Isidore rely primarily on two Oklahoma cases to support their contention: Murrow Indian Orphans Home v. Childers, 1946 OK 187 , 171 P.2d 600 , and Oliver v.

Board of Com'rs of Kingfisher County v. Grimes

75 Okla. 219 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 29, 1919

In the ease of Finney v. Board of Co. Com’rs., 1 Okla. Indus. Com. … Co. v. Reinman, 63 Oklahoma, 162 Pac. 726 ; 36 Cyc. 1119; State ex rel. v. Gordon (Mo.) 188 S. W. 88 ; Black v. Commonwealth (Ky.) 188 S. W. 362 ; Zacarro v. State (Tex.) 197 S. W. 982 . The case of Board of Com’rs v.

Arthur v. Board of Com'rs of Choctaw County

43 Okla. 174 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 14, 1914

In Barrett et al. v. Kemp et al., 91 Iowa, 296 , 59 N. … In Knoblauch v. Minneapolis, 56 Minn. 321 , 57 N.

Board of Com'rs of Delaware County v. Williams

38 Okla. 738 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 9, 1913

All parties agree that the board of county commissioners acted correctly in allowing the salary on the basis of the special census of 1907 until the census had been taken by the state authorities in 1908. … official census of the state, for, as just stated, the parties agree that the board of county commissioners pursued the cor *742 Tect- course during ■ that time.

Board of Comrs. of Washita Co. v. Hubble

8 Okla. 169 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 11, 1899

(Grand Lodge v. Furman, 6 Okla. 649 , 52 Pac. 932 ; Sanford v. Weeks, 50 Kan. 336 , 31 Pac. 1087 ; Eddy v. Weaver, 37 Kan. 540 , 15 Pac. 492 ; Brown v. Johnson, 14 Kan. 377 ; Bartlett v. Feeney, 11 Kan. 593 ; Wilson v. … App.] 42 Pac. 1092 ; North Side Town Co. v. Rittenhouse, [Kan. Sup.] 30 Pac. 181 ; Hill v. Bank, [Kan. Sup.] 22 Pac. 325 ; Tootle v. Turner, [Kan. App.] 54 Pac. 1036 .)

Board of Com'rs, Comanche Co. v. Fain

66 Okla. 13 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 24, 1917

The Criminal Court of Appeals of this state, in Hisaw v. State, 13 Okla. … This court, also, in the case of Johnston v. Board of Commissioners of Murray County, 53 Okla. 693 , 158 Pac. 164 , said: “By sections 1598 and 6860, Comp. Laws 1909 (Rev.

Chivers v. Board of Com'rs of Johnston County

62 Okla. 2 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 5, 1916

Chivers, as guardian of certain minors, sued the-board of county commissioners of Johnston county to recover certain taxes paid by him. … rendered on October 24, 1914,” and, without granting any new trial, made the temporary restraining order, theretofore issued against the county treasurer, a perpetual injunction, and rendered judgment for the defendant board

State Insurance Board v. Hospital Mutual, Inc.

181 Okla. 555 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 18, 1938

This is an action in mandamus by Hospital Mutual, Inc., hereinafter called plaintiff, to compel the Insurance Board of the State of Oklahoma, hereinafter termed defendant, to issue an annual license for the year 1936. … McCauley v. State, 162 Okla. 153 , 19 P. (2d) 561 ; Roper v. Board of Education of City of Okmulgee, 167 Okla. 382 , 29 P. (2d) 950 . The appeal is dismissed. OSBORN, C. J., and PHELPS, GIBSON, and DAVISON, JX, concur.

Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Brown

161 Okla. 151 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 6, 1932

Brown, claimant herein. … Brown was permanently partially disabled instead of totally and permanently disabled.

Board of Ed. of Oklahoma City v. Woodworth

89 Okla. 192 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 13, 1923

A few of the cases announcing this same principle are as follows: Fox v. City of Seattle (Wash.) 86 Pac. 379 : Howland v. Board of Supervisors, 109 Cal. 152 , 41 Pac. 864 ; Morgan v. … Kansas Cily v. *196 Orear (Mo.) 210 S. W. 892 ; Franklin v. School District, 271 Mo. 698 , 197 S. W. 346 ; Montgomery County Fiscal Court v. Thimble, 104 Ky. 629 , 47 S. W. 773 ; Board of Education v.

Board of Equalization v. Broadway Development Co.

178 Okla. 266 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 1, 1936

Nichols, Inc., v. Bonaparte, 176 Okla. 100 , 54 P. (2d) 1042 , when considering an assessment of this character, we said that the same was “in the nature of an original or primary assessment.” … State v. Holcomb, 81 Kan. 879 , 106 P. 1030 , 28 L. R. A. (N. S.) 251. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. McNEILL, o. j., and BUSBY, WELCH,’ PHELPS, and CORN, JJ., concur. OSBORN, Y. O.

Pope v. Board of Com'rs of Oklahoma Co.

45 Okla. 521 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 2, 1915

This is an appeal from the action of the superior court of Oklahoma county in affirming the action of the board of county commissioners of said county in rejecting a claim for $1,284.25 presented to it by the county attorney … Marr v. State, 26 Ark. 410 ; Combs v. People, 39 Ill. 183 ; People v. Witt, 19 Ill. 169 ; State v. Klingman, 14 Iowa, 404 .

Board of Com'rs of Tulsa County v. Bilby

174 Okla. 199 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 15, 1935

The same contention was again presented in Whiteneck, Adm’r, v. Board of Com’rs of Woods County, 89 Okla. 52 , 213 P. 865 , and therein the rule announced in the Board of Com’rs v. … Thereafter, in the case of Board of Trustees of Crutcho Township v.

Board of County Com'rs v. Board of Education

141 Okla. 55 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 7, 1930

No. 7, Creek Co., v. Board of Co. Com’rs, 135 Okla. 1 , 275 Pac. 292 ; Board of Co. Com’rs, Carter Co., v. School Dist. No. 71, Carter Co., 135 Okla. 248 , 275 Pac. 302 ; Board of Co. Com’rs, Carter Co., v. School Dist. … Board Education, City of Sapulpa, v. Bd. Co.

Rice v. State Board of Medical Examiners

208 Okla. 440 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 12, 1953

. * * *” One of the earliest applications of such principle in this jurisdiction may be observed in our early decision in Gillespie v. State (1911) 5 Okla. Cr. 546 , 115 P. 620 , 35 L.R.A. (N.S.) 1171, Ann. … The court’s opinion quoted from McKnight v.