Case law

Tidal Refining Co. v. Charles E. Knox Oil Co.

116 Okla. 1 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 12, 1926

Oklahoma Hospital v. Brown, 87 Okla. 46 , 208 Pac. 785 ; Western Supply Co. v. Oil Country Drilling Co., 97 Okla. 188 , 223 Pac. 399 ; Lamb v. Ulrich, 94 Okla. 240 , 221 Pac. 741 ; Beggs Oil & Gas Co. v. … In Adams v.

Kondos v. Stauffer

180 Okla. 185 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 1, 1937

Brown: To which ruling of the court the plaintiff excepts. … Prowant v. Sealy, 77 Okla. 244 , 187 P. 235 .

Deere v. Gypsy Oil Co.

160 Okla. 237 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 29, 1932

Under the holding of this court in the cases of Eaves v. Mullen, 25 Okla. 679 , 107 P. 433 , and Luker v. Masterson, Harrison v. Orwig, and Riley v. … S. 1921, as construed in Tiger v. Brown, supra, said section is applicable in this case.

Tobin v. City of Shawnee

95 Okla. 297 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 23, 1923

'Stat. 1921, the excise board of the county is required to approve the estimates furnished by the municipality within the limits provided by law, and, after having approved the same, the board is required to make a levy therefor … Smith v. Coffman, 3 Okla. 568 , 41 Pac. 722 ; Wray v. Howard, 79 Okla. 223 , 192 Pac. 584 . Por the reasons stated, the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed, and it is so ordered. JOHNSON, C.

Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. v. Risinger

393 P.2d 507 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 16, 1964

They argue, in substance, that under the proper interpretation of this law, such proof is necessary to establish a prima facie of liability under it, citing Manglesdorf Seed Co. v. Busby, 118 Okl. 255 , 247 P. 410 . … HALLEY, V. C. J., and DAVISON, JOPINSON, WILLIAMS, JACKSON and BERRY, JJ,, concur.

Central Fire Ins. Co. of Baltimore v. Smith

188 Okla. 203 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 1, 1940

As said in the case of Settle v. … City of Newkirk v. Dimmers, 17 Okla. 525 , 87 P. 603 ; Pressley v. Inc. Town of Sallisaw, 54 Okla. 747 , 154 P. 660 ; Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Kramer, 65 Okla. 165 , 165 P. 179 . In Sawyer v.

Wiker v. Ritter

97 Okla. 84 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 22, 1924

Co. v. Davidson Mill & Elevator Co., 26 Okla. 626 , 110 Pac. 1096 ; First National Bank of Tishomingo v. Ingle, 37 Okla. 276 , 132 Pac. 895 ; Curtis & Gartside Co. v. Pigg, 39 Okla. 31 , 134 Pac. 1125 ; M., O. & G. Ry. … Co. v. Collins, 47 Okla. 761 , 150 Pac. 142 ; Weller v. Dusky, 51 Okla. 77 , 151 Pac. 606 .

Patterson v. Beall

71 O.B.A.J. 3016 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 14, 2000

Bane v. Anderson, Bryant & Company, 1989 OK 140 , 133, 786 P.2d 1230, 1237 ; Mills v. Mills, 1973 OK 74, ¶ 32 , 512 P.2d 143, 151 . . Hughey v. … Joiner v. Brown, 1996 OK 112, ¶ 6 , 925 P.2d 888, 890 , citing Pryse Monument Company v.

Kimble v. Kimble

264 P.3d 1229 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 18, 2011

.]; Pierce v. Pierce, see note 11, infra; Johnson v. Board of Governors of Registered Dentists, see note 11, infra; Craig v. Walker, see note 11, infra; Sadberry v. Wilson, see note 11, infra; Pitman v. … Zeier v. Zimmer, 2006 OK 98, fn. 8 , 152 P.3d 861 ; Barzellone v. Presley, 2005 OK 86, 115 , 126 P.3d 588 ; Presley v. Board of County Comm'rs, 1999 OK. 45, 8, 981 P.2d 309 ; City of Bethany v.

Francis Vitric Brick Co. v. State Industrial Commission

76 Okla. 314 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 25, 1919

Under rule 6 (75 Okla. v. of the rules provided by this court, the action shall be heard in a summary manner upon the record and proceedings had before the Industrial Commission. … Board of Commissioners of Cleveland Co. v. Barr et al., 68 Oklahoma, 178 Pac. 206 ; Lahoma Oil Co. v. Industrial Commission of Oklahoma, 71 Oklahoma, 175 Pac. 836 ; Flynn v.

Dial v. Kirkpatrick

168 Okla. 21 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 21, 1933

In the case of Bass v. … Rep. 677 ; Fields v. Brown (Ill.) 58 N. E. 977 ; Schley v. Andrews (N. Y.) 121 N. E. 812 ; Barnard v. Bilby, 68 Okla. 63 , 171 P. 444 . In the case of the People ex rel.

In Re Johnson

72 Okla. 174 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 18, 1919

Leonard v. Childers, 67 Okla. 222 , 170 P. 247 ; Brown v. Trent, 36 Okla. 239 , 128 P. 895 ; Johnson v. Filtsch, 37 Okla. 510 , 138 P. 165 ; Elrod v. Adair, 54 Okla. 207 , 153 P. 660 . In Ozark Oil Co. v. … In Barnett v.

Pauls Valley Milling Co. v. Gabbert

182 Okla. 500 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 5, 1938

A warranty is an express or implied statement of something undertaken as a part of a contract of sale, but collateral to its express object (Brown v. … Wallace v. L. D. Clark & Son, 74 Okla. 208 , 174 P. 557 , 21 A. L. R. 361; Lawton Refining Co. v. Hollister, 86 Okla. 13 , 205 P. 506 ; Wood & Co. v.

Mullis v. Mullis

669 P.2d 763 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 13, 1983

Jaramillo v. Jaramillo, 27 Wash.App. 391 , 618 P.2d 528 (Wash.App.1980); Koehler v. Koehler, 559 S.W.2d 944 (Tenn.App.1977); Commonwealth v. Byrne, 212 Pa.Super. 566 , 243 A.2d 196 (Pa.Super.1968); Moore v. … The syllabus in Brown v.

Okla. Natural Gas Co. v. State

78 Okla. 5 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 20, 1920

Co. v. Board of Ed., 64 Oklahoma, 166 Pac. 128 ; City of Pawhuska v. Pawhuska O. & G. Co., 64 Oklahoma, 166 Pac. 1058 ; Muskogee Gas & Elec. Co. v. State, No. 10635 (not yet officially reported). … Guthrie Gas, Light, Fuel & Improvement Co. v. Board of Ed., supra; City of Pawhuska v. Pawhuska O. & G. Co., supra; Muskogee G. & E. Co. v. State et al., supra.

Shuler v. Hall

42 Okla. 325 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 17, 1914

See Gann v. Ball, 27 Okla. 452, 112 Pac. 1134 ; Finch v. Brown, 27 Okla. 217, 111 Pac. 391 ; Incorporated Town of Stigler v. Wiley, 36 Okla. 291 , 128 Pac. 118 . … In Fairbanks v. Simpson (Tex. Civ. App.) 28 S.

Stewart v. Lafayette

55 Okla. 411 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 21, 1915

from'the decision of the architects referred to in article VIII of this contract, which dissent shall have been filed in writing within ten days from the announcement of such decision, then the matter shall be referred to a board … The decision of any two of the board shall be final and binding on both parties hereto. Each party shall pay one-half of the expense of such reference.”

Application of Oklahoma Turnpike Authority

348 P.2d 510 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 8, 1960

Board of County Commissioners of Harmon County v. … v.

Freeman v. Masters

161 Okla. 8 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 6, 1932

In the response to the petition for rehearing, the decision of this court in Brown v. Minshall, 83 Okla. 98 , 202 P. 1037 , was cited. … The defendants in error contend that the question in this case has been settled by the decisions of this court in Brown v. Minshall, supra, and Boyd v. Weer, supra. In Brown v.

Mullen v. Noah

64 Okla. 181 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 10, 1917

Houston v. Clark, 36 Kan. 414 , 13 Pac. 739 ; Oberlander et al. v. Confrey, 38 Kan. 462 , 17 Pac. 88 ; Allen v. Dodson, 39 Kan. 220 , 17 Pac. 667 ; Smith-Frazer Boot & Shoe Co. v. Derse, 41 Kan. 150 , 21 Pac. 167 . … Such, also, is the holding of this court in the case of Hudson v. Hildt, 51 Okla. 359 , 151 Pac. 1063 . See, also, case No. 6892, Brown et al. v. Howard Van Pelt, 64 Okla. 109 , 166 Pac. 102 .