Case law

Davis v. Rivers

103 Okla. 198 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 7, 1924

Hart v. Railroad, 69 Iowa, 485 . 29 N. W. 597 ; Ninnelee v. St. L. I. M. & S. Ry. Co. (Bio.) 129 S. W. 762 . In Stone v. … Harris v. Packwood, 3 Taunt. 264: Beardslee v. Richardson, 11 Wend. (N. Y.) 26 ( 25 Am. Dec. 596 ) : Browne v. Johnson. 29 Tex. 43 : Lamb v. Camden & Amboy R. C. ( 46 N. Y. 271 , 7 Am. Rep. 327 ) ; (Jackson v. Sac. Val.

Craig v. State Ex Rel. Com'rs of the Land Office

147 Okla. 223 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 17, 1931

The board ' of county commissioners of Major county and all other defendants made default. … The appeal is dismissed under authority of Taylor v. Taylor, 90 Okla. 128 , 215 Pac. 1070 , and Smith v. Walker, 116 Okla. 213 , 243 Pac. 955 .

In Re Ballot Title for Initiative Petition No. 43, State Question No. 28

35 Okla. 188 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 3, 1912

, and in lieu thereof providing for state, county, and precinct election boards. … (Edwards et al., Board of Trustees, v. Welch, 29 Okla. 335 , 116 Pac. 791; Cleveland-Trinidad Paving Co. v. Woods, 29 Okla. 684, 119 Pac. 123 ; Bryan v. Sullivan, 29 Okla. 686 , 119 Pac. 124 .)

Presgrove v. Robbins

451 P.2d 961 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 21, 1969

Brown, who, as aforesaid, had drafted the will. Thereafter, Mr. … This Court demonstrated in Holliday v.

Robertson v. Eldridge

15 Okla. 599 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 6, 1905

.: Lots number sixteen, seventeen and eighteen, in block number twenty-six, in the city of Gnthrie (proper), were, by the towasite board, deeded to George C. Eldridge. … They hold that a judgment, under the statutes then in force, was a lien on the real estate of the judgment debtor in the county wherein he resided, except the case of Chandler v.

Denson v. Frame

98 Okla. 132 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 18, 1924

Menten v. Shuttee, 11 Okla. 381 , 67 Pac. 478 ; McMechan v. Christie, 3 Okla. 301 , 41 Pac. 382 ; Black v. Kuhn, 6 Okla. 87 , 50 Pac. 80 ; Board of Co. Com., Logan County, v. … Co. v. McCollum & Baker, 23 Okla 899, 101 Pac. 1120 ; Green v. Inc. Town Yeager, 23 Okla. 128 , 99 Pac. 906 ; Devault et al. v. Merchants Exchange Co., 22 Okla. 624 , 98 Pac. 342 ; McCarthy v.

Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. Cowen

71 Okla. 299 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 11, 1916

In Brown et al. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. (Tex. Civ. App ) 76 S. … Pierce v. Dustin, 24 N. H. 417; Little v. Downing, 37 N. H. 356.

Atkinson v. GURICH

248 P.3d 356 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 22, 2011

See Soldal v. Cook County Ill., 506 U.S. 56, 67 , 113 S.Ct. 538 , 121 LEd.2d 450 (1992); O'Connor v. Ortega, 480 U.S. 709, 714 , 107 S.Ct. 1492 , 94 L.Ed.2d 714 (1987); New Jersey v. … But see State v.

Herweg, Etc. v. Bd. of Educ. of Lawton Pub. S.

673 P.2d 154 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 16, 1983

Wright v. Consolidated School Dist. No. 1 of Tulsa County, 162 Okl. 110 , 19 P.2d 369 (1938); Lamont Ind. School Dist. # 1 —95 of Grant County v. Swanson, Okl., 548 P.2d 215 (1976). … See, e.g., Kepler v. Strain, Okl., 579 P.2d 191 (1978), and, Tipton v. Standard Installment Finance Co., Okl., 418 P.2d 309 (1966).

Scott v. Amis

136 Okla. 72 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 31, 1928

In the case, of Board of Commissioners of Kingfisher County v. … This court in the case of Board of Commissioners of Kingfisher County v.

Gibbons v. Missouri, K. & T. R. Co.

142 Okla. 146 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 11, 1930

Co. v. Todd, 91 Ky. 175 , 11 L. R. A. 285; 12 C. J. 911. In the case of Woodruff v. New York, etc., Ry. … Co. v. City of St. Louis (Mo.) 137 S. W. 929 ; City of St. Louis v. Galt (Mo.) 77 S. W. 876 ; Thos. Cusack Co. v. City of Chicago, 267 Ill. 344 , 108 N. E: 340; Cusack v. Chicago, 242 U. S. 526 .

Anderson v. Anderson

45 Okla. 653 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 23, 1915

See, also, Hines et al. v. Mullins, 25 Ga. 696 ; Harbin v. Bell, 54 Ala. 389 ; Irwin, Adm’r, etc., v. Backus, 25 Cal. 214 , 85 Am. Dec. 125 ; 21 Cyc. 178. … BROWN, J., dissents.

City of Bristow Ex Rel. Hedges v. Groom

194 Okla. 384 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 29, 1944

Boise Live Stock Loan Co., 47 Idaho, 712 , 278 P. 214 ; Town of Morganton v. Avery, 179 N.C. 551 , 103 S.E. 138 ; Waggoner v. Board of Councilmen of Frankfort, 30 Ky. L. 847, 99 S.W. 918 ; State v. … Vahlberg, 185 Okla. 28 , 89 P. 2d 962 ; see, also, Board of County Com’rs v.

Peeviehouse v. Peeviehouse

104 Okla. 10 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 28, 1924

Montgomery v. Montgomery, 41 Okla. 581 , 139 Pac. 288 ; Board of Comm’rs v. Hazelwood, 79 Okla. 185 , 192 Pac. 217 .

Coogan v. Arkla Exploration Co.

589 P.2d 1061 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 9, 1979

In Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. … In Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v.

Ratcliff v. Cobb

439 P.2d 194 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1968

In Jones v. … In Pointer v. Symonds, Okl., 372 P.2d 868, 870 , we approved the holding in Jones v. Major, supra, that the requirements of § 855 were jurisdictional. And in Brown Investment Company v.

Waddle v. Gammel

305 P.2d 559 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 26, 1956

We said in Wentz v. … In Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v.

Planters' Cotton & Ginning Co. v. Penny

53 Okla. 136 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 15, 1916

Co. v. Archer, 46 Neb. 914 , 65 N. … And in Suttle v. Brown, 137 Ill.

C. M. Keys Commission Co. v. Beatty

42 Okla. 721 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 25, 1914

S.) 1020; McIver v. Williamson-Halsell-Frasier Co., 19 Okla. 454 , 92 Pac. 170 , 13 L. R. A. (N. S.) 696; People's State Bank v. Brown, 80 Kan. 520 , 103 Pac. 102 , 23 L. R. A. (N. S.) 824. … See, however, Kemper Grain Co. v. Alvin Harbour, 89 Kan. 824 , 133 Pac. 665 , 47 L. R. A. (N.

Taylor v. McDaniels

139 Okla. 262 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 24, 1929

This court in Dawkins v. … It is clear that plaintiff had a right to a hearing before the boards of inquiry, but there was no provision made that McDaniels should he on that board. It provided for “one disinterested engineer.”