Case law

Wiggins v. Sterne

293 P.2d 603 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 20, 1955

This court in Shick v. … See Panther Oil & Gas Co. v. Brown, 170 Old. 210, 39 P.2d 150 , and cases therein cited.

Hair v. Wilson

391 P.2d 789 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 21, 1964

Plaintiff cites Jackson v. Brown, Okl., 361 P.2d 270 , and other cases, to support his contention that the testimony was not admissible because it expressed an opinion as to who was at fault in the collision. … Plaintiff cites Nash v. Hiller, Okl., 380 P.2d 77 , and Houston v.

Wickham v. Grand River Dam Authority

189 Okla. 540 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 21, 1941

The offer was accepted by resolution of the board of directors on August 7, 1941. … Ed, 382); Wolff v. New Orleans, 103 U. S. 358 , 26 L. Ed. 395 .” *544 See, also, Gunn v. Barry, 82 U. S. 610 , 21 L. Ed. 212 ; McBride v. Retirement Board of Allegheny County, 330 Pa. 402 , 199 Atl. 130 ; Haberlach v.

Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Andrews

145 Okla. 93 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 23, 1930

Excise Board of Washington County, Okla., No. 20099. On April 9, 1929, the case of Missouri, Kansas Texas Railway Company v. … Excise Board of Washington County, Okla., was by this court affirmed. 136 Okla. 191 , 276 P. 769 .

Oklahoma Salvage & Supply Co. v. First Nat. Bank of Okmulgee

122 Okla. 128 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 29, 1926

Charles v. Prentice, 88 Okla. 246 , 212 Pac. 585 . … Citing Frazer v. Thrift, 50 Cal. 476 ; Brown v. Duncan, 132 Ill. 413 , 23 N. E. 1126 , 22 Am. St. Rep. 545 ; Mayer v. Farmers Bank, 44 Iowa, 212 ; Bower v. Holladay, 18 Ore. 491 , 22 Pac. 553 .

Renfrow v. Grimes

6 Okla. 608 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 18, 1898

(See page 16, Rules of Board for leasing school land, published May 1, 1897.) … Co. v. St Louis, etc. R. Co., 118 U. S. 290 ; St. Louis, etc. R. Co. v. Terre Haute, etc. R. Co., 145 U. S. 393 ; Thomas v. West Jersey, 101 U.

Dirtseller v. Carry

108 Okla. 206 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 14, 1925

DeWatteville v. Sims, 44 Okla. 708 , 146 Pac. 224 . Cressler v. Brown, 79 Okla. 170 , 192 Pac. 418 (syllabus 13) : “The inquiry of res judicata is no't limited to the mere formal judgment. … Brown v. Capital Township Co., 21 Okla. 586 , 96 Okla. 587 ; Oklahoma City v. McMaster, 196 U. S. 529 ; Oklahoma Moline Plow Co. v. Smith, 81 Okla. 61 , 196 Pac. 962 ; Kashman v. Parsons. 770 Conn. 295 ; O’Neil v.

Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. Cowen

71 Okla. 299 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 11, 1916

In Brown et al. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. (Tex. Civ. App ) 76 S. … Pierce v. Dustin, 24 N. H. 417; Little v. Downing, 37 N. H. 356.

Mitchell v. Humphrey

36 Okla. 711 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 21, 1913

Laws 1909) an equitable title will support the action, while it would not at common law, and this has been ruled (Shy v. Brockhause, 7 Okla. 35 , 54 Pac. 306 ; Jennings v. … Brown, 20 Okla. 294 , 94 Pac. 557 ), yet the plaintiffs in this casé have shown no kind of title, either legal or equitable.

Henry Kendall College v. Fisher

94 Okla. 255 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 26, 1923

The Supreme Court of Oklahoma, in the case of Bruner v. … Cressler v. Brown, 79 Okla. 170 , 192 Pac. 417 ; Uncle Sam Oil Co. v. Richards, 73 Oklahoma, 175 Pac. 749 ; Oklahoma Moline Plow Co. v. Smith, 81 Okla. 61 , 196 Pac. 962 .

Tobin v. O'Brieter

16 Okla. 500 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 15, 1906

And in the case of Moors v. … In Caldwell v.

City of Clinton v. White Crow

488 P.2d 1232 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 22, 1971

In the third paragraph of this court’s syllabus in Murray County v. … State Insurance Fund v.

Ex Parte Holmes

162 Okla. 30 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 7, 1933

Said section further provides that a bond may be required of such person or company as required by the board of commissioners. … The identical question presented in the case at bar, to wit, the power to tax by a municipality, was passed upon by this court in the very recent case of Grantham v.

Neustadt v. Daube

190 Okla. 694 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 16, 1942

The above section of the statute was construed in the recent case of McCleary v. Brown, 190 Okla. 19 , 119 P. 2d 830 , 137 A. L. R. 1018. … CORN, V. C. J., and RILEY, HURST, and ARNOLD, JJ., absent.

Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Mowry

167 Okla. 644 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 27, 1934

Moore & Gleason v. Taylor, 97. Okla. 193, 223 P. 611 . In the case of Rorabaugh-Brown Dry Goods Co. v. … Gypsum Co. v.

Anderson v. Anderson

45 Okla. 653 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 23, 1915

See, also, Hines et al. v. Mullins, 25 Ga. 696 ; Harbin v. Bell, 54 Ala. 389 ; Irwin, Adm’r, etc., v. Backus, 25 Cal. 214 , 85 Am. Dec. 125 ; 21 Cyc. 178. … BROWN, J., dissents.

Cunningham v. Cromley

54 Okla. 266 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 21, 1915

Trower v. Roberts, 17 Okla. 641 , 89 Pac. 1113 . Since statehood this rule has been followed in a multitude of decisions; the latest,- perhaps, being the case of Hughes v. C., R. I. & P. Ry. … Co. v.

FENT v. FALLIN

2014 OK 105 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 2, 2014

OSCN Found Document:FENT v. FALLIN OSCN navigation Home Courts Court Dockets Legal Research Calendar Help Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print Only FENT v. … It modifies income tax rates and requires the Board of Equalization to make certain determinations. 3 Oklahoma Tax Commission. Fiscal Impact Statement and/or Administrative Impact Statement.

Manley v. Pool

117 Okla. 249 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 4, 1926

In the case of Noyes v. … In the case of Musial et ux. v.

Herweg, Etc. v. Bd. of Educ. of Lawton Pub. S.

673 P.2d 154 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 16, 1983

Wright v. Consolidated School Dist. No. 1 of Tulsa County, 162 Okl. 110 , 19 P.2d 369 (1938); Lamont Ind. School Dist. # 1 —95 of Grant County v. Swanson, Okl., 548 P.2d 215 (1976). … See, e.g., Kepler v. Strain, Okl., 579 P.2d 191 (1978), and, Tipton v. Standard Installment Finance Co., Okl., 418 P.2d 309 (1966).