Case law

Ruemmeli v. Cravens

13 Okla. 342 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 10, 1903

(Floyd v. Patterson, 13 Am. St. Rep. 787 ; Gilliam v. Brown, 43 Miss. 641 ; Simpson v. Blass, 2 Taunt 246; Roby v. West, 4 N. H. 290.) This rule as stated by the supreme court of the United States in Planters' Bank v. … (Wooten v. Miller, 7 Smed. & M. [Miss.] 380; Maybin v. Coulon, 4 Dall. [Pa.] 298; Floyd v. Patterson, 72 Tex. 202 .)

Settle v. City of Muskogee

462 P.2d 642 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 31, 1969

In Henry v. … In Haas v.

First National Bank of Okmulgee v. Wisdom

97 Okla. 298 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 19, 1924

In Mundell v. Wells et al. … Campbell v. County Board of Commissioners of Reno County (Kan.) 354 Pac. 257 ; Wright & Taylor v. Dougherty et al. (Iowa) 115 NW. 908. Plaintiff relies on Whitaker v. State, 31 Okla. 65 , 119 Pac. 1003 .

Shipp v. Southeastern Oklahoma Industries Authority

498 P.2d 1395 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 27, 1972

He says that, when properly interpreted, Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County et al. v. Warram et al. (1955), Okl., 285 P.2d 1034 , and Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County et al. v. … Woodward v. City of Anadarko et al. (1960), Okl., 351 P.2d 292 , and Morrison v.

Abbott v. McCoy

208 Okla. 224 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 3, 1953

In the case of Baptist General Convention, etc., et al. v. … Worth Lead & Zinc Co. v.

Grim v. Cordell

197 Okla. 144 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 21, 1946

State Election Board (1926) 121 Okla. 119 , 248 P. 642 ; Monroe v. McNeill (1927) 122 Okla. 297 , 255 P. 150 , and Johnson v. State Election Board, 197 Okla. 211 , 167 P. 2d 891 . … He cites the following authorities: People v. Board of Election Com’rs of Chicago, 221 Ill. 9 , 77 N. E. 321 ; People v. McCormack, 261 Ill. 413 , 103 N.E. 1053 ; McAlpine v.

C. M. Keys Commission Co. v. Beatty

42 Okla. 721 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 25, 1914

S.) 1020; McIver v. Williamson-Halsell-Frasier Co., 19 Okla. 454 , 92 Pac. 170 , 13 L. R. A. (N. S.) 696; People's State Bank v. Brown, 80 Kan. 520 , 103 Pac. 102 , 23 L. R. A. (N. S.) 824. … See, however, Kemper Grain Co. v. Alvin Harbour, 89 Kan. 824 , 133 Pac. 665 , 47 L. R. A. (N.

Ratcliff v. Cobb

439 P.2d 194 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1968

In Jones v. … In Pointer v. Symonds, Okl., 372 P.2d 868, 870 , we approved the holding in Jones v. Major, supra, that the requirements of § 855 were jurisdictional. And in Brown Investment Company v.

Padgett v. Trent

61 Okla. 49 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 12, 1916

It was said in Leak et al v. … This subject has been thoroughly discussed in Mitchell v. Bell, 31 Okla. 117 , 120 Pac. 560 ; Past v. Walcott et al., 38 Okla. 715 , 134 Pac. 848 ; Ross v. Stewart, 25 Okla. 611 , 106 Pac. 870 ; Citizens’ Trading Co. v.

Parker v. Walker

48 Okla. 705 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 6, 1915

Mulvane v. … The case of Newman v. Brown, 27 Kan. 121 , cited by plaintiff in error, is not in point, for there the name of the owner was omitted. In the case at bar the name* of the owner is given.

National Bank of Anadarko v. Oldham

26 Okla. 139 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 10, 1910

See Glidden v. Pooler, 50 Ill. App. 36 ; Brown v. Doyle, 69 Minn. 543 , 72 N. W. 814 ; First National Bank v. Robinson, Adm’r., 105 Iowa, 463 , 75 N. W. 334 . 2. … Leakins v. Clissel, 1 Lev. 102; Lysney v. Selby, 2 Ld. Raym. 1118; Bowring v. Stevens, 2 C. & P. 337; Cross v. Peters, 1 Greenl. 389 [ 10 Am. Dec. 78 ].” See, also, Mitchell v. Zimmerman, 4 Tex. 75 , 51 Am.

Goldman v. Goldman

65 O.B.A.J. 3918 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 11, 1994

See Board of Law Library Trustees v. State, Okl., 825 P.2d 1285, 1291 (1991); Spain v. Kernell, Okl, 672 P.2d 1162, 1164-1165 (1983); Bryan v. … For the general rule stated in the text see Interstate Power Co. v. Hughes, 175 Okl. 511 , Old, 53 P.2d 1096, 1097 (1936); Wagoner Oil & Gas Co. v. Goad, 136 Okl. 29 , Okl., 275 P. 1036, 1037 (1929); Sandlin v.

Merfeld v. Anderson

97 Okla. 208 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 12, 1924

In Kuhn v. … In Logan v.

Readdy v. Mallory

57 Okla. 499 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 2, 1916

“A writ of prohibition will not lie to an executive or ministerial board to prohibit it from the performance of ministerial or executive functions.” (Jamieson v. … Gen. v. Huston, 27 Okla. 607 , 113 Pac. 190 , 34 L. R. A. [N. S.] 380.)

Buellesfeld v. Jones

187 Okla. 596 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 25, 1940

Brown v. Wrightsman, 175 Okla. 189 , 51 P. 2d 761 ; Murnan v. Isbell, 133 Okla. 160 , 271 P. 649 . … WELCH, V. C. J., and CORN and GIBSON, JJ., absent.

Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Bradshaw

37 Okla. 317 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 6, 1913

[Embree & Collins v. Hanna] 5 Johns. [N. Y.] 101; [Browne v. Joy] 9 Johns. [N. Y.] 221, and the cases there cited. … See, also, Campbell et al. v. Emerson et al., 2 McLean, 30 , Fed. Cas. No. 2,357; Greenwood et al. v. Rector, Hempst. 708 , Fed. Cas. No. 5,792. In Wood v.

City of Tulsa v. State Industrial Commission

316 P.2d 612 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 1, 1957

Board of County Commissioners v. Horne, Okl., 288 P.2d 406 . In City of Pryor v. … In City of Yale v. Jones, 166 Okl. 111 , 26 P.2d 427 , an award was sustained where the employee was injured while driving a tractor for the city. In City of Tulsa Water Department v.

STEVENS v. FOX

2016 OK 106 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 11, 2016

In Board of Trustees of Judicial Form Retirement System v. … Board of Trustees of Judicial Form Retirement System v. Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, 132 S.W. 3d 770, 778 (Ky. 2003). (Emphasis added).

First Nat. Bank of Cushing v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co.

77 Okla. 93 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 13, 1920

National Lumber Co. v. Elred, 77 Oklahoma; Iowa National Bank v. Citizens National Bank of Woodsocket, R. I., 70 Oklahoma, 172 Pac. 924 ; First National Bank of Laramie, Wyo., v. … Co. v. Brown, 55 Okla. 173 , 154 Pac. 1161 ; Critser v. Steeley, 62 Oklahoma, 162 Pac. 795 . The appeal in this cause, in so far as the same affects the Atchison, T. & S. F. R.

Swafford v. Sherwin Williams

64 O.B.A.J. 3366 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 2, 1993

See, Coleman v. J. C. Penney Company, 848 P.2d 1158, 1160 (Okla.1993). No one factor is controlling, and the relationship must be based on the set of facts peculiar to the case. Page v. … Coleman v. J.C. Penney, at 1160; Brown v. Burkett, 755 P.2d 650, 651 (Okla.1988); Leonhardt Enterprises v. Houseman, 562 P.2d 515, 518 (Okla.1977).